Is broadcast DATA_SMS_RECEIVED on the Whitelist for implicit broadcast receivers?












0














https://developer.android.com/guide/components/broadcast-exceptions



states that SMS_RECEIVED_ACTION is on the whitelist, but DATA_SMS_RECEIVED is not mentioned.



I currently am updating my app to the current versions and now receiving data sms stopped to work. I suspect, that DATA_SMS_RECEIVED is now blocked from the implicit broadcasts.



Anybody with deeper insights?










share|improve this question






















  • I just ran a quick test on my 8.0 device, and data SMS still works for me. What have you tested on? Emulators? Devices?
    – Mike M.
    Nov 20 '18 at 14:42










  • I tested on a real device (Nexus 5X) with Android 8.1 But as I am in the middle of migrating to AndroidX it might be possible that problems also from that side are introduced. Wanted to make sure that it makes sense to dig deeper there.
    – Sqrt-1764
    Nov 20 '18 at 14:45












  • You might test on some emulators. I'll do that, too, when I get a chance, later on.
    – Mike M.
    Nov 20 '18 at 14:46






  • 1




    You can run two emulators simultaneously, and send between them. The number to use is the port number – e.g., 5554 – which should be part of the name in the title bar, IIRC. It's been a while since I've done it myself.
    – Mike M.
    Nov 20 '18 at 14:52






  • 1




    Thank you for your input! From the last comment there it seems that this fix hasn't made it to the final release? Anyway: As this is a nice-to-have feature for my app, i wait for the answer from Google for permission to use those permissions before I put more work into this. If they deny, that work would be for the trash-bin.
    – Sqrt-1764
    Nov 24 '18 at 15:03
















0














https://developer.android.com/guide/components/broadcast-exceptions



states that SMS_RECEIVED_ACTION is on the whitelist, but DATA_SMS_RECEIVED is not mentioned.



I currently am updating my app to the current versions and now receiving data sms stopped to work. I suspect, that DATA_SMS_RECEIVED is now blocked from the implicit broadcasts.



Anybody with deeper insights?










share|improve this question






















  • I just ran a quick test on my 8.0 device, and data SMS still works for me. What have you tested on? Emulators? Devices?
    – Mike M.
    Nov 20 '18 at 14:42










  • I tested on a real device (Nexus 5X) with Android 8.1 But as I am in the middle of migrating to AndroidX it might be possible that problems also from that side are introduced. Wanted to make sure that it makes sense to dig deeper there.
    – Sqrt-1764
    Nov 20 '18 at 14:45












  • You might test on some emulators. I'll do that, too, when I get a chance, later on.
    – Mike M.
    Nov 20 '18 at 14:46






  • 1




    You can run two emulators simultaneously, and send between them. The number to use is the port number – e.g., 5554 – which should be part of the name in the title bar, IIRC. It's been a while since I've done it myself.
    – Mike M.
    Nov 20 '18 at 14:52






  • 1




    Thank you for your input! From the last comment there it seems that this fix hasn't made it to the final release? Anyway: As this is a nice-to-have feature for my app, i wait for the answer from Google for permission to use those permissions before I put more work into this. If they deny, that work would be for the trash-bin.
    – Sqrt-1764
    Nov 24 '18 at 15:03














0












0








0


1





https://developer.android.com/guide/components/broadcast-exceptions



states that SMS_RECEIVED_ACTION is on the whitelist, but DATA_SMS_RECEIVED is not mentioned.



I currently am updating my app to the current versions and now receiving data sms stopped to work. I suspect, that DATA_SMS_RECEIVED is now blocked from the implicit broadcasts.



Anybody with deeper insights?










share|improve this question













https://developer.android.com/guide/components/broadcast-exceptions



states that SMS_RECEIVED_ACTION is on the whitelist, but DATA_SMS_RECEIVED is not mentioned.



I currently am updating my app to the current versions and now receiving data sms stopped to work. I suspect, that DATA_SMS_RECEIVED is now blocked from the implicit broadcasts.



Anybody with deeper insights?







android android-intent






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked Nov 20 '18 at 13:01









Sqrt-1764

808




808












  • I just ran a quick test on my 8.0 device, and data SMS still works for me. What have you tested on? Emulators? Devices?
    – Mike M.
    Nov 20 '18 at 14:42










  • I tested on a real device (Nexus 5X) with Android 8.1 But as I am in the middle of migrating to AndroidX it might be possible that problems also from that side are introduced. Wanted to make sure that it makes sense to dig deeper there.
    – Sqrt-1764
    Nov 20 '18 at 14:45












  • You might test on some emulators. I'll do that, too, when I get a chance, later on.
    – Mike M.
    Nov 20 '18 at 14:46






  • 1




    You can run two emulators simultaneously, and send between them. The number to use is the port number – e.g., 5554 – which should be part of the name in the title bar, IIRC. It's been a while since I've done it myself.
    – Mike M.
    Nov 20 '18 at 14:52






  • 1




    Thank you for your input! From the last comment there it seems that this fix hasn't made it to the final release? Anyway: As this is a nice-to-have feature for my app, i wait for the answer from Google for permission to use those permissions before I put more work into this. If they deny, that work would be for the trash-bin.
    – Sqrt-1764
    Nov 24 '18 at 15:03


















  • I just ran a quick test on my 8.0 device, and data SMS still works for me. What have you tested on? Emulators? Devices?
    – Mike M.
    Nov 20 '18 at 14:42










  • I tested on a real device (Nexus 5X) with Android 8.1 But as I am in the middle of migrating to AndroidX it might be possible that problems also from that side are introduced. Wanted to make sure that it makes sense to dig deeper there.
    – Sqrt-1764
    Nov 20 '18 at 14:45












  • You might test on some emulators. I'll do that, too, when I get a chance, later on.
    – Mike M.
    Nov 20 '18 at 14:46






  • 1




    You can run two emulators simultaneously, and send between them. The number to use is the port number – e.g., 5554 – which should be part of the name in the title bar, IIRC. It's been a while since I've done it myself.
    – Mike M.
    Nov 20 '18 at 14:52






  • 1




    Thank you for your input! From the last comment there it seems that this fix hasn't made it to the final release? Anyway: As this is a nice-to-have feature for my app, i wait for the answer from Google for permission to use those permissions before I put more work into this. If they deny, that work would be for the trash-bin.
    – Sqrt-1764
    Nov 24 '18 at 15:03
















I just ran a quick test on my 8.0 device, and data SMS still works for me. What have you tested on? Emulators? Devices?
– Mike M.
Nov 20 '18 at 14:42




I just ran a quick test on my 8.0 device, and data SMS still works for me. What have you tested on? Emulators? Devices?
– Mike M.
Nov 20 '18 at 14:42












I tested on a real device (Nexus 5X) with Android 8.1 But as I am in the middle of migrating to AndroidX it might be possible that problems also from that side are introduced. Wanted to make sure that it makes sense to dig deeper there.
– Sqrt-1764
Nov 20 '18 at 14:45






I tested on a real device (Nexus 5X) with Android 8.1 But as I am in the middle of migrating to AndroidX it might be possible that problems also from that side are introduced. Wanted to make sure that it makes sense to dig deeper there.
– Sqrt-1764
Nov 20 '18 at 14:45














You might test on some emulators. I'll do that, too, when I get a chance, later on.
– Mike M.
Nov 20 '18 at 14:46




You might test on some emulators. I'll do that, too, when I get a chance, later on.
– Mike M.
Nov 20 '18 at 14:46




1




1




You can run two emulators simultaneously, and send between them. The number to use is the port number – e.g., 5554 – which should be part of the name in the title bar, IIRC. It's been a while since I've done it myself.
– Mike M.
Nov 20 '18 at 14:52




You can run two emulators simultaneously, and send between them. The number to use is the port number – e.g., 5554 – which should be part of the name in the title bar, IIRC. It's been a while since I've done it myself.
– Mike M.
Nov 20 '18 at 14:52




1




1




Thank you for your input! From the last comment there it seems that this fix hasn't made it to the final release? Anyway: As this is a nice-to-have feature for my app, i wait for the answer from Google for permission to use those permissions before I put more work into this. If they deny, that work would be for the trash-bin.
– Sqrt-1764
Nov 24 '18 at 15:03




Thank you for your input! From the last comment there it seems that this fix hasn't made it to the final release? Anyway: As this is a nice-to-have feature for my app, i wait for the answer from Google for permission to use those permissions before I put more work into this. If they deny, that work would be for the trash-bin.
– Sqrt-1764
Nov 24 '18 at 15:03












0






active

oldest

votes











Your Answer






StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53393576%2fis-broadcast-data-sms-received-on-the-whitelist-for-implicit-broadcast-receivers%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























0






active

oldest

votes








0






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes
















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53393576%2fis-broadcast-data-sms-received-on-the-whitelist-for-implicit-broadcast-receivers%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

"Incorrect syntax near the keyword 'ON'. (on update cascade, on delete cascade,)

Alcedinidae

Origin of the phrase “under your belt”?