What does the value of a PDF mean? [duplicate]












4












$begingroup$



This question already has an answer here:




  • What does the value of a probability density function (PDF) at some x indicate?

    5 answers




I understand that the integral of a PDF provides tangible value --i.e., the integral of a PDF allows one to see the probability of a value or less than that value, under a particular distribution, occurring. But, what does the value of just the output of the PDF provide? In other words, what does the PDF of the standard normal distribution at x=0.5 mean?










share|cite|improve this question







New contributor




Lea is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$



marked as duplicate by Lord Shark the Unknown, Rahul, A. Pongrácz, Cesareo, Leila 2 days ago


This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.











  • 2




    $begingroup$
    The PDF is the rate of change of the CDF. No more, no less.
    $endgroup$
    – JimB
    2 days ago
















4












$begingroup$



This question already has an answer here:




  • What does the value of a probability density function (PDF) at some x indicate?

    5 answers




I understand that the integral of a PDF provides tangible value --i.e., the integral of a PDF allows one to see the probability of a value or less than that value, under a particular distribution, occurring. But, what does the value of just the output of the PDF provide? In other words, what does the PDF of the standard normal distribution at x=0.5 mean?










share|cite|improve this question







New contributor




Lea is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$



marked as duplicate by Lord Shark the Unknown, Rahul, A. Pongrácz, Cesareo, Leila 2 days ago


This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.











  • 2




    $begingroup$
    The PDF is the rate of change of the CDF. No more, no less.
    $endgroup$
    – JimB
    2 days ago














4












4








4





$begingroup$



This question already has an answer here:




  • What does the value of a probability density function (PDF) at some x indicate?

    5 answers




I understand that the integral of a PDF provides tangible value --i.e., the integral of a PDF allows one to see the probability of a value or less than that value, under a particular distribution, occurring. But, what does the value of just the output of the PDF provide? In other words, what does the PDF of the standard normal distribution at x=0.5 mean?










share|cite|improve this question







New contributor




Lea is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$





This question already has an answer here:




  • What does the value of a probability density function (PDF) at some x indicate?

    5 answers




I understand that the integral of a PDF provides tangible value --i.e., the integral of a PDF allows one to see the probability of a value or less than that value, under a particular distribution, occurring. But, what does the value of just the output of the PDF provide? In other words, what does the PDF of the standard normal distribution at x=0.5 mean?





This question already has an answer here:




  • What does the value of a probability density function (PDF) at some x indicate?

    5 answers








probability






share|cite|improve this question







New contributor




Lea is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|cite|improve this question







New contributor




Lea is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question






New contributor




Lea is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked 2 days ago









LeaLea

211




211




New contributor




Lea is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





Lea is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






Lea is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.




marked as duplicate by Lord Shark the Unknown, Rahul, A. Pongrácz, Cesareo, Leila 2 days ago


This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.






marked as duplicate by Lord Shark the Unknown, Rahul, A. Pongrácz, Cesareo, Leila 2 days ago


This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.










  • 2




    $begingroup$
    The PDF is the rate of change of the CDF. No more, no less.
    $endgroup$
    – JimB
    2 days ago














  • 2




    $begingroup$
    The PDF is the rate of change of the CDF. No more, no less.
    $endgroup$
    – JimB
    2 days ago








2




2




$begingroup$
The PDF is the rate of change of the CDF. No more, no less.
$endgroup$
– JimB
2 days ago




$begingroup$
The PDF is the rate of change of the CDF. No more, no less.
$endgroup$
– JimB
2 days ago










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















3












$begingroup$

I would first say that you should try to be OK with it not having a super down-to-earth meaning. It can sometimes help to let yourself be abstract and use the mathematical tools you have to get somewhere you might not have gotten by purely reasoning through with statements you might use to describe other things in your daily life. On the other hand, it is often helpful to have somewhat concrete ways of thinking about things that are abstract, so it's good that you're investigating this.



But as the PDF is the derivative of the CDF, the value of PDF $p(x)$ at $x$ is the (slope of the) best linear approximation of the CDF near $x$, i.e., that if $epsilon$ is super small, then if you want to approximate the probability that an event between $x$ and $x+epsilon$ happens linearly in $epsilon$, your best bet is to say $epsilon cdot p(x)$.






share|cite|improve this answer










New contributor




csprun is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






$endgroup$





















    1












    $begingroup$


    Definition (Gut, 2005): A distribution function F is




    • discrete iff for some countable set of numbers {$x_j$} and point masses {$p_j$}, $$F(x) = sum_{x_jleq x} p_j, quad text{for all x} in Bbb R.$$ The function p is called the probability function.

    • continuous iff it is continuous for all x.

    • absolutely continuous iff there exists a non-negative, Lebesgue integrable function f, such that $$F(b) - F(a) = int_a^b f(x)text{ dx} quad {for space all space x < b.}$$ The function f is called the density of F.

    • singular iff F $neq$ 0, F' exists and equals 0 a.e.




    By the definition, evaluating a probability distribution function F is simply an integration of the density of said distribution. As mentioned, in the case for a $<$ b, this gives us the probability for a given range of values.



    However, if evaluating the distribution function F at a single value, the integral clearly vanishes. To find the probability of a single value, F must be discrete thereby allowing us to compute $$F(a) = sum_{a in X} p_j(a).$$ By taking the limit on $int_a^bf(x)text{dx}$ to F(a + $epsilon$) - F(a - $epsilon$) = $int_{a-epsilon}^{a+epsilon}f(x)text{dx}$, we then thus find the relative probability of F(a) occuring.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$




















      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes








      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      3












      $begingroup$

      I would first say that you should try to be OK with it not having a super down-to-earth meaning. It can sometimes help to let yourself be abstract and use the mathematical tools you have to get somewhere you might not have gotten by purely reasoning through with statements you might use to describe other things in your daily life. On the other hand, it is often helpful to have somewhat concrete ways of thinking about things that are abstract, so it's good that you're investigating this.



      But as the PDF is the derivative of the CDF, the value of PDF $p(x)$ at $x$ is the (slope of the) best linear approximation of the CDF near $x$, i.e., that if $epsilon$ is super small, then if you want to approximate the probability that an event between $x$ and $x+epsilon$ happens linearly in $epsilon$, your best bet is to say $epsilon cdot p(x)$.






      share|cite|improve this answer










      New contributor




      csprun is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.






      $endgroup$


















        3












        $begingroup$

        I would first say that you should try to be OK with it not having a super down-to-earth meaning. It can sometimes help to let yourself be abstract and use the mathematical tools you have to get somewhere you might not have gotten by purely reasoning through with statements you might use to describe other things in your daily life. On the other hand, it is often helpful to have somewhat concrete ways of thinking about things that are abstract, so it's good that you're investigating this.



        But as the PDF is the derivative of the CDF, the value of PDF $p(x)$ at $x$ is the (slope of the) best linear approximation of the CDF near $x$, i.e., that if $epsilon$ is super small, then if you want to approximate the probability that an event between $x$ and $x+epsilon$ happens linearly in $epsilon$, your best bet is to say $epsilon cdot p(x)$.






        share|cite|improve this answer










        New contributor




        csprun is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.






        $endgroup$
















          3












          3








          3





          $begingroup$

          I would first say that you should try to be OK with it not having a super down-to-earth meaning. It can sometimes help to let yourself be abstract and use the mathematical tools you have to get somewhere you might not have gotten by purely reasoning through with statements you might use to describe other things in your daily life. On the other hand, it is often helpful to have somewhat concrete ways of thinking about things that are abstract, so it's good that you're investigating this.



          But as the PDF is the derivative of the CDF, the value of PDF $p(x)$ at $x$ is the (slope of the) best linear approximation of the CDF near $x$, i.e., that if $epsilon$ is super small, then if you want to approximate the probability that an event between $x$ and $x+epsilon$ happens linearly in $epsilon$, your best bet is to say $epsilon cdot p(x)$.






          share|cite|improve this answer










          New contributor




          csprun is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.






          $endgroup$



          I would first say that you should try to be OK with it not having a super down-to-earth meaning. It can sometimes help to let yourself be abstract and use the mathematical tools you have to get somewhere you might not have gotten by purely reasoning through with statements you might use to describe other things in your daily life. On the other hand, it is often helpful to have somewhat concrete ways of thinking about things that are abstract, so it's good that you're investigating this.



          But as the PDF is the derivative of the CDF, the value of PDF $p(x)$ at $x$ is the (slope of the) best linear approximation of the CDF near $x$, i.e., that if $epsilon$ is super small, then if you want to approximate the probability that an event between $x$ and $x+epsilon$ happens linearly in $epsilon$, your best bet is to say $epsilon cdot p(x)$.







          share|cite|improve this answer










          New contributor




          csprun is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.









          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer








          edited 2 days ago





















          New contributor




          csprun is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.









          answered 2 days ago









          cspruncsprun

          29415




          29415




          New contributor




          csprun is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.





          New contributor





          csprun is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.






          csprun is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.























              1












              $begingroup$


              Definition (Gut, 2005): A distribution function F is




              • discrete iff for some countable set of numbers {$x_j$} and point masses {$p_j$}, $$F(x) = sum_{x_jleq x} p_j, quad text{for all x} in Bbb R.$$ The function p is called the probability function.

              • continuous iff it is continuous for all x.

              • absolutely continuous iff there exists a non-negative, Lebesgue integrable function f, such that $$F(b) - F(a) = int_a^b f(x)text{ dx} quad {for space all space x < b.}$$ The function f is called the density of F.

              • singular iff F $neq$ 0, F' exists and equals 0 a.e.




              By the definition, evaluating a probability distribution function F is simply an integration of the density of said distribution. As mentioned, in the case for a $<$ b, this gives us the probability for a given range of values.



              However, if evaluating the distribution function F at a single value, the integral clearly vanishes. To find the probability of a single value, F must be discrete thereby allowing us to compute $$F(a) = sum_{a in X} p_j(a).$$ By taking the limit on $int_a^bf(x)text{dx}$ to F(a + $epsilon$) - F(a - $epsilon$) = $int_{a-epsilon}^{a+epsilon}f(x)text{dx}$, we then thus find the relative probability of F(a) occuring.






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$


















                1












                $begingroup$


                Definition (Gut, 2005): A distribution function F is




                • discrete iff for some countable set of numbers {$x_j$} and point masses {$p_j$}, $$F(x) = sum_{x_jleq x} p_j, quad text{for all x} in Bbb R.$$ The function p is called the probability function.

                • continuous iff it is continuous for all x.

                • absolutely continuous iff there exists a non-negative, Lebesgue integrable function f, such that $$F(b) - F(a) = int_a^b f(x)text{ dx} quad {for space all space x < b.}$$ The function f is called the density of F.

                • singular iff F $neq$ 0, F' exists and equals 0 a.e.




                By the definition, evaluating a probability distribution function F is simply an integration of the density of said distribution. As mentioned, in the case for a $<$ b, this gives us the probability for a given range of values.



                However, if evaluating the distribution function F at a single value, the integral clearly vanishes. To find the probability of a single value, F must be discrete thereby allowing us to compute $$F(a) = sum_{a in X} p_j(a).$$ By taking the limit on $int_a^bf(x)text{dx}$ to F(a + $epsilon$) - F(a - $epsilon$) = $int_{a-epsilon}^{a+epsilon}f(x)text{dx}$, we then thus find the relative probability of F(a) occuring.






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$
















                  1












                  1








                  1





                  $begingroup$


                  Definition (Gut, 2005): A distribution function F is




                  • discrete iff for some countable set of numbers {$x_j$} and point masses {$p_j$}, $$F(x) = sum_{x_jleq x} p_j, quad text{for all x} in Bbb R.$$ The function p is called the probability function.

                  • continuous iff it is continuous for all x.

                  • absolutely continuous iff there exists a non-negative, Lebesgue integrable function f, such that $$F(b) - F(a) = int_a^b f(x)text{ dx} quad {for space all space x < b.}$$ The function f is called the density of F.

                  • singular iff F $neq$ 0, F' exists and equals 0 a.e.




                  By the definition, evaluating a probability distribution function F is simply an integration of the density of said distribution. As mentioned, in the case for a $<$ b, this gives us the probability for a given range of values.



                  However, if evaluating the distribution function F at a single value, the integral clearly vanishes. To find the probability of a single value, F must be discrete thereby allowing us to compute $$F(a) = sum_{a in X} p_j(a).$$ By taking the limit on $int_a^bf(x)text{dx}$ to F(a + $epsilon$) - F(a - $epsilon$) = $int_{a-epsilon}^{a+epsilon}f(x)text{dx}$, we then thus find the relative probability of F(a) occuring.






                  share|cite|improve this answer









                  $endgroup$




                  Definition (Gut, 2005): A distribution function F is




                  • discrete iff for some countable set of numbers {$x_j$} and point masses {$p_j$}, $$F(x) = sum_{x_jleq x} p_j, quad text{for all x} in Bbb R.$$ The function p is called the probability function.

                  • continuous iff it is continuous for all x.

                  • absolutely continuous iff there exists a non-negative, Lebesgue integrable function f, such that $$F(b) - F(a) = int_a^b f(x)text{ dx} quad {for space all space x < b.}$$ The function f is called the density of F.

                  • singular iff F $neq$ 0, F' exists and equals 0 a.e.




                  By the definition, evaluating a probability distribution function F is simply an integration of the density of said distribution. As mentioned, in the case for a $<$ b, this gives us the probability for a given range of values.



                  However, if evaluating the distribution function F at a single value, the integral clearly vanishes. To find the probability of a single value, F must be discrete thereby allowing us to compute $$F(a) = sum_{a in X} p_j(a).$$ By taking the limit on $int_a^bf(x)text{dx}$ to F(a + $epsilon$) - F(a - $epsilon$) = $int_{a-epsilon}^{a+epsilon}f(x)text{dx}$, we then thus find the relative probability of F(a) occuring.







                  share|cite|improve this answer












                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer










                  answered 2 days ago









                  Victoria MVictoria M

                  10113




                  10113