Are these words concrete or abstract nouns?












1















Whenever I think of a concrete noun, I think of something that can be perceived by the five senses.



I was wondering, if I could see a particular practice taking place, as in a series of football drills, would the word 'practice' be a concrete noun? I can also see a 'lesson' taking place, so would that also be a concrete noun?



Also, are sounds concrete nouns too? I can hear a 'bang', so would it be classed as a concrete noun?



Thanks in advance for any answers to clarify this.










share|improve this question

























  • You can perceive love with your eyes too. Practice is abstracted from the verb to practice. You identify it from a combination of people's actions, their environment, the props that they use. In the same way lesson is also an abstract concept from the Latin verb legere (to read). It is composed of a combination of people's actions, an environment like a school or other, and props.

    – mama
    9 hours ago













  • I understand. What about sounds? Due to the fact that you can perceive them with your ears, are they concrete nouns, or abstract?

    – Tolga
    8 hours ago
















1















Whenever I think of a concrete noun, I think of something that can be perceived by the five senses.



I was wondering, if I could see a particular practice taking place, as in a series of football drills, would the word 'practice' be a concrete noun? I can also see a 'lesson' taking place, so would that also be a concrete noun?



Also, are sounds concrete nouns too? I can hear a 'bang', so would it be classed as a concrete noun?



Thanks in advance for any answers to clarify this.










share|improve this question

























  • You can perceive love with your eyes too. Practice is abstracted from the verb to practice. You identify it from a combination of people's actions, their environment, the props that they use. In the same way lesson is also an abstract concept from the Latin verb legere (to read). It is composed of a combination of people's actions, an environment like a school or other, and props.

    – mama
    9 hours ago













  • I understand. What about sounds? Due to the fact that you can perceive them with your ears, are they concrete nouns, or abstract?

    – Tolga
    8 hours ago














1












1








1








Whenever I think of a concrete noun, I think of something that can be perceived by the five senses.



I was wondering, if I could see a particular practice taking place, as in a series of football drills, would the word 'practice' be a concrete noun? I can also see a 'lesson' taking place, so would that also be a concrete noun?



Also, are sounds concrete nouns too? I can hear a 'bang', so would it be classed as a concrete noun?



Thanks in advance for any answers to clarify this.










share|improve this question
















Whenever I think of a concrete noun, I think of something that can be perceived by the five senses.



I was wondering, if I could see a particular practice taking place, as in a series of football drills, would the word 'practice' be a concrete noun? I can also see a 'lesson' taking place, so would that also be a concrete noun?



Also, are sounds concrete nouns too? I can hear a 'bang', so would it be classed as a concrete noun?



Thanks in advance for any answers to clarify this.







nouns abstract-nouns






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 10 hours ago







Tolga

















asked 10 hours ago









TolgaTolga

494




494













  • You can perceive love with your eyes too. Practice is abstracted from the verb to practice. You identify it from a combination of people's actions, their environment, the props that they use. In the same way lesson is also an abstract concept from the Latin verb legere (to read). It is composed of a combination of people's actions, an environment like a school or other, and props.

    – mama
    9 hours ago













  • I understand. What about sounds? Due to the fact that you can perceive them with your ears, are they concrete nouns, or abstract?

    – Tolga
    8 hours ago



















  • You can perceive love with your eyes too. Practice is abstracted from the verb to practice. You identify it from a combination of people's actions, their environment, the props that they use. In the same way lesson is also an abstract concept from the Latin verb legere (to read). It is composed of a combination of people's actions, an environment like a school or other, and props.

    – mama
    9 hours ago













  • I understand. What about sounds? Due to the fact that you can perceive them with your ears, are they concrete nouns, or abstract?

    – Tolga
    8 hours ago

















You can perceive love with your eyes too. Practice is abstracted from the verb to practice. You identify it from a combination of people's actions, their environment, the props that they use. In the same way lesson is also an abstract concept from the Latin verb legere (to read). It is composed of a combination of people's actions, an environment like a school or other, and props.

– mama
9 hours ago







You can perceive love with your eyes too. Practice is abstracted from the verb to practice. You identify it from a combination of people's actions, their environment, the props that they use. In the same way lesson is also an abstract concept from the Latin verb legere (to read). It is composed of a combination of people's actions, an environment like a school or other, and props.

– mama
9 hours ago















I understand. What about sounds? Due to the fact that you can perceive them with your ears, are they concrete nouns, or abstract?

– Tolga
8 hours ago





I understand. What about sounds? Due to the fact that you can perceive them with your ears, are they concrete nouns, or abstract?

– Tolga
8 hours ago










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















0














The concept of concrete and abstract nouns does not hold up to serious scrutiny.



In general, it seems that abstract noun describes an idea, a process, a state, or a group of things.



Practice is probably an abstract noun because it describes a collection of actions, or processes, and each of those actions or processes is abstract. Ball, leg, foot, and shoe are all concrete, but the action of kicking a ball, the kick is abstract.



Now, clearly you can see a kick - you can perceive that the leg has moved and the foot has collided with something. So maybe a kick is actually a concrete noun. Then let's try a more obviously abstract noun.



When you look up descriptions of abstract nouns, one thing that you'll almost always see mentioned is emotion. A smile, they say, is concrete, but happiness, the thing that causes the person to smile, is abstract.



With happiness, there seems to be nothing we can perceive - unless you define happiness as a mental state that is caused by an increase in certain chemicals in the brain. Brain chemistry can't be seen with the naked eye, but it can be perceived using special tools. And being visible to the naked eye must not really be the definition of concrete, since in that case, microorganisms would always be abstract.



Or, let's come at it from the other direction, with an example of a concrete noun.



A house seems like a nice, solid object. So what is a house? It seems to be a structure that someone lives in. But in that case, we're attributing a purpose (to be lived in), or a condition of existence (it is a house so long as someone lives in it) and purposes and conditions are definitely abstract.



When it comes down to it, there's no entirely satisfying way to define concrete and abstract.



Fortunately, it shouldn't matter.



To be frank, I don't know why anyone teaches this concept. Before answering this question, I read all the results that apapeared on the first page of a Google search and none even began to explain why it would matter whether a noun were concrete or abstract. Grammatically, there is no difference between a concrete and an abstract noun.






share|improve this answer























    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "97"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f485398%2fare-these-words-concrete-or-abstract-nouns%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    0














    The concept of concrete and abstract nouns does not hold up to serious scrutiny.



    In general, it seems that abstract noun describes an idea, a process, a state, or a group of things.



    Practice is probably an abstract noun because it describes a collection of actions, or processes, and each of those actions or processes is abstract. Ball, leg, foot, and shoe are all concrete, but the action of kicking a ball, the kick is abstract.



    Now, clearly you can see a kick - you can perceive that the leg has moved and the foot has collided with something. So maybe a kick is actually a concrete noun. Then let's try a more obviously abstract noun.



    When you look up descriptions of abstract nouns, one thing that you'll almost always see mentioned is emotion. A smile, they say, is concrete, but happiness, the thing that causes the person to smile, is abstract.



    With happiness, there seems to be nothing we can perceive - unless you define happiness as a mental state that is caused by an increase in certain chemicals in the brain. Brain chemistry can't be seen with the naked eye, but it can be perceived using special tools. And being visible to the naked eye must not really be the definition of concrete, since in that case, microorganisms would always be abstract.



    Or, let's come at it from the other direction, with an example of a concrete noun.



    A house seems like a nice, solid object. So what is a house? It seems to be a structure that someone lives in. But in that case, we're attributing a purpose (to be lived in), or a condition of existence (it is a house so long as someone lives in it) and purposes and conditions are definitely abstract.



    When it comes down to it, there's no entirely satisfying way to define concrete and abstract.



    Fortunately, it shouldn't matter.



    To be frank, I don't know why anyone teaches this concept. Before answering this question, I read all the results that apapeared on the first page of a Google search and none even began to explain why it would matter whether a noun were concrete or abstract. Grammatically, there is no difference between a concrete and an abstract noun.






    share|improve this answer




























      0














      The concept of concrete and abstract nouns does not hold up to serious scrutiny.



      In general, it seems that abstract noun describes an idea, a process, a state, or a group of things.



      Practice is probably an abstract noun because it describes a collection of actions, or processes, and each of those actions or processes is abstract. Ball, leg, foot, and shoe are all concrete, but the action of kicking a ball, the kick is abstract.



      Now, clearly you can see a kick - you can perceive that the leg has moved and the foot has collided with something. So maybe a kick is actually a concrete noun. Then let's try a more obviously abstract noun.



      When you look up descriptions of abstract nouns, one thing that you'll almost always see mentioned is emotion. A smile, they say, is concrete, but happiness, the thing that causes the person to smile, is abstract.



      With happiness, there seems to be nothing we can perceive - unless you define happiness as a mental state that is caused by an increase in certain chemicals in the brain. Brain chemistry can't be seen with the naked eye, but it can be perceived using special tools. And being visible to the naked eye must not really be the definition of concrete, since in that case, microorganisms would always be abstract.



      Or, let's come at it from the other direction, with an example of a concrete noun.



      A house seems like a nice, solid object. So what is a house? It seems to be a structure that someone lives in. But in that case, we're attributing a purpose (to be lived in), or a condition of existence (it is a house so long as someone lives in it) and purposes and conditions are definitely abstract.



      When it comes down to it, there's no entirely satisfying way to define concrete and abstract.



      Fortunately, it shouldn't matter.



      To be frank, I don't know why anyone teaches this concept. Before answering this question, I read all the results that apapeared on the first page of a Google search and none even began to explain why it would matter whether a noun were concrete or abstract. Grammatically, there is no difference between a concrete and an abstract noun.






      share|improve this answer


























        0












        0








        0







        The concept of concrete and abstract nouns does not hold up to serious scrutiny.



        In general, it seems that abstract noun describes an idea, a process, a state, or a group of things.



        Practice is probably an abstract noun because it describes a collection of actions, or processes, and each of those actions or processes is abstract. Ball, leg, foot, and shoe are all concrete, but the action of kicking a ball, the kick is abstract.



        Now, clearly you can see a kick - you can perceive that the leg has moved and the foot has collided with something. So maybe a kick is actually a concrete noun. Then let's try a more obviously abstract noun.



        When you look up descriptions of abstract nouns, one thing that you'll almost always see mentioned is emotion. A smile, they say, is concrete, but happiness, the thing that causes the person to smile, is abstract.



        With happiness, there seems to be nothing we can perceive - unless you define happiness as a mental state that is caused by an increase in certain chemicals in the brain. Brain chemistry can't be seen with the naked eye, but it can be perceived using special tools. And being visible to the naked eye must not really be the definition of concrete, since in that case, microorganisms would always be abstract.



        Or, let's come at it from the other direction, with an example of a concrete noun.



        A house seems like a nice, solid object. So what is a house? It seems to be a structure that someone lives in. But in that case, we're attributing a purpose (to be lived in), or a condition of existence (it is a house so long as someone lives in it) and purposes and conditions are definitely abstract.



        When it comes down to it, there's no entirely satisfying way to define concrete and abstract.



        Fortunately, it shouldn't matter.



        To be frank, I don't know why anyone teaches this concept. Before answering this question, I read all the results that apapeared on the first page of a Google search and none even began to explain why it would matter whether a noun were concrete or abstract. Grammatically, there is no difference between a concrete and an abstract noun.






        share|improve this answer













        The concept of concrete and abstract nouns does not hold up to serious scrutiny.



        In general, it seems that abstract noun describes an idea, a process, a state, or a group of things.



        Practice is probably an abstract noun because it describes a collection of actions, or processes, and each of those actions or processes is abstract. Ball, leg, foot, and shoe are all concrete, but the action of kicking a ball, the kick is abstract.



        Now, clearly you can see a kick - you can perceive that the leg has moved and the foot has collided with something. So maybe a kick is actually a concrete noun. Then let's try a more obviously abstract noun.



        When you look up descriptions of abstract nouns, one thing that you'll almost always see mentioned is emotion. A smile, they say, is concrete, but happiness, the thing that causes the person to smile, is abstract.



        With happiness, there seems to be nothing we can perceive - unless you define happiness as a mental state that is caused by an increase in certain chemicals in the brain. Brain chemistry can't be seen with the naked eye, but it can be perceived using special tools. And being visible to the naked eye must not really be the definition of concrete, since in that case, microorganisms would always be abstract.



        Or, let's come at it from the other direction, with an example of a concrete noun.



        A house seems like a nice, solid object. So what is a house? It seems to be a structure that someone lives in. But in that case, we're attributing a purpose (to be lived in), or a condition of existence (it is a house so long as someone lives in it) and purposes and conditions are definitely abstract.



        When it comes down to it, there's no entirely satisfying way to define concrete and abstract.



        Fortunately, it shouldn't matter.



        To be frank, I don't know why anyone teaches this concept. Before answering this question, I read all the results that apapeared on the first page of a Google search and none even began to explain why it would matter whether a noun were concrete or abstract. Grammatically, there is no difference between a concrete and an abstract noun.







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered 7 hours ago









        JuhaszJuhasz

        1,24316




        1,24316






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language & Usage Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f485398%2fare-these-words-concrete-or-abstract-nouns%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            If I really need a card on my start hand, how many mulligans make sense? [duplicate]

            Alcedinidae

            Can an atomic nucleus contain both particles and antiparticles? [duplicate]