Confusion on use of だった with sentence that uses nominalized verb
I'm reading a book and have come across this sentence
アニーが指さしているのは、一本のなわばしごだった。
I know this sentence translates to something like
Annie was pointing to a long rope ladder.
But what I truly don't understand is what does the だった at the end modify?
Is it modifying アニーが指さしている (Annie pointing) like I believe?
Or is it really modifying 一本のなわばしご (rope ladder)? And the translated sentence is more like
Annie pointed to what was a long rope ladder
grammar copula past cleft-sentences
edited yesterday
Chocolate♦
47.3k458120
asked yesterday
TylersansanTylersansan
3408
add a comment |
I'm reading a book and have come across this sentence
アニーが指さしているのは、一本のなわばしごだった。
I know this sentence translates to something like
Annie was pointing to a long rope ladder.
But what I truly don't understand is what does the だった at the end modify?
Is it modifying アニーが指さしている (Annie pointing) like I believe?
Or is it really modifying 一本のなわばしご (rope ladder)? And the translated sentence is more like
Annie pointed to what was a long rope ladder
grammar copula past cleft-sentences
edited yesterday
Chocolate♦
47.3k458120
asked yesterday
TylersansanTylersansan
3408
1
I'm not sure if you're really interested in the technical terms, but the question as phrased doesn't quite make sense. It doesn't modify anything, it's predicating. Predicates and modifiers are two different things.
– snailboat♦
yesterday
1
'The thing Annie was pointing at' or 'What Annie was pointing at' seems more in line with the original text. Where are you seeing the word 'long'?
– user27280
yesterday
@user27280 I thought this was implied by 一本 (one long cylindrical thing). Maybe this is wrong of me. You are right, there is no word that directly means long in this sentence
– Tylersansan
yesterday
@snailboat I'm all for technical if it can help me understand. Not sure if this is right, but assuming a predicate is defined as "the part that tells us what the subject does or is". Does this mean だった is predicating Annie and my first assumption was correct?
– Tylersansan
yesterday
Expanding on @naruto's answer below: The tense of the final verb (or copula in this case) sets the tone (tense) for the entire sentence, thereby changing 'Annie is pointing' to 'Annie was pointing'. So, while there is an influence, it is not in the category of modification.
– user27280
yesterday
add a comment |
I'm reading a book and have come across this sentence
アニーが指さしているのは、一本のなわばしごだった。
I know this sentence translates to something like
Annie was pointing to a long rope ladder.
But what I truly don't understand is what does the だった at the end modify?
Is it modifying アニーが指さしている (Annie pointing) like I believe?
Or is it really modifying 一本のなわばしご (rope ladder)? And the translated sentence is more like
Annie pointed to what was a long rope ladder
grammar copula past cleft-sentences
edited yesterday
Chocolate♦
47.3k458120
asked yesterday
TylersansanTylersansan
3408
I'm reading a book and have come across this sentence
アニーが指さしているのは、一本のなわばしごだった。
I know this sentence translates to something like
Annie was pointing to a long rope ladder.
But what I truly don't understand is what does the だった at the end modify?
Is it modifying アニーが指さしている (Annie pointing) like I believe?
Or is it really modifying 一本のなわばしご (rope ladder)? And the translated sentence is more like
Annie pointed to what was a long rope ladder
grammar copula past cleft-sentences
grammar copula past cleft-sentences
edited yesterday
Chocolate♦
47.3k458120
asked yesterday
TylersansanTylersansan
3408
edited yesterday
Chocolate♦
47.3k458120
asked yesterday
TylersansanTylersansan
3408
edited yesterday
Chocolate♦
47.3k458120
edited yesterday
Chocolate♦
47.3k458120
edited yesterday
Chocolate♦
47.3k458120
47.3k458120
asked yesterday
TylersansanTylersansan
3408
asked yesterday
TylersansanTylersansan
3408
asked yesterday
TylersansanTylersansan
3408
3408
1
I'm not sure if you're really interested in the technical terms, but the question as phrased doesn't quite make sense. It doesn't modify anything, it's predicating. Predicates and modifiers are two different things.
– snailboat♦
yesterday
1
'The thing Annie was pointing at' or 'What Annie was pointing at' seems more in line with the original text. Where are you seeing the word 'long'?
– user27280
yesterday
@user27280 I thought this was implied by 一本 (one long cylindrical thing). Maybe this is wrong of me. You are right, there is no word that directly means long in this sentence
– Tylersansan
yesterday
@snailboat I'm all for technical if it can help me understand. Not sure if this is right, but assuming a predicate is defined as "the part that tells us what the subject does or is". Does this mean だった is predicating Annie and my first assumption was correct?
– Tylersansan
yesterday
Expanding on @naruto's answer below: The tense of the final verb (or copula in this case) sets the tone (tense) for the entire sentence, thereby changing 'Annie is pointing' to 'Annie was pointing'. So, while there is an influence, it is not in the category of modification.
– user27280
yesterday
add a comment |
1
I'm not sure if you're really interested in the technical terms, but the question as phrased doesn't quite make sense. It doesn't modify anything, it's predicating. Predicates and modifiers are two different things.
– snailboat♦
yesterday
1
'The thing Annie was pointing at' or 'What Annie was pointing at' seems more in line with the original text. Where are you seeing the word 'long'?
– user27280
yesterday
@user27280 I thought this was implied by 一本 (one long cylindrical thing). Maybe this is wrong of me. You are right, there is no word that directly means long in this sentence
– Tylersansan
yesterday
@snailboat I'm all for technical if it can help me understand. Not sure if this is right, but assuming a predicate is defined as "the part that tells us what the subject does or is". Does this mean だった is predicating Annie and my first assumption was correct?
– Tylersansan
yesterday
Expanding on @naruto's answer below: The tense of the final verb (or copula in this case) sets the tone (tense) for the entire sentence, thereby changing 'Annie is pointing' to 'Annie was pointing'. So, while there is an influence, it is not in the category of modification.
– user27280
yesterday
1
1
I'm not sure if you're really interested in the technical terms, but the question as phrased doesn't quite make sense. It doesn't modify anything, it's predicating. Predicates and modifiers are two different things.
– snailboat♦
yesterday
I'm not sure if you're really interested in the technical terms, but the question as phrased doesn't quite make sense. It doesn't modify anything, it's predicating. Predicates and modifiers are two different things.
– snailboat♦
yesterday
1
1
'The thing Annie was pointing at' or 'What Annie was pointing at' seems more in line with the original text. Where are you seeing the word 'long'?
– user27280
yesterday
'The thing Annie was pointing at' or 'What Annie was pointing at' seems more in line with the original text. Where are you seeing the word 'long'?
– user27280
yesterday
@user27280 I thought this was implied by 一本 (one long cylindrical thing). Maybe this is wrong of me. You are right, there is no word that directly means long in this sentence
– Tylersansan
yesterday
@user27280 I thought this was implied by 一本 (one long cylindrical thing). Maybe this is wrong of me. You are right, there is no word that directly means long in this sentence
– Tylersansan
yesterday
@snailboat I'm all for technical if it can help me understand. Not sure if this is right, but assuming a predicate is defined as "the part that tells us what the subject does or is". Does this mean だった is predicating Annie and my first assumption was correct?
– Tylersansan
yesterday
@snailboat I'm all for technical if it can help me understand. Not sure if this is right, but assuming a predicate is defined as "the part that tells us what the subject does or is". Does this mean だった is predicating Annie and my first assumption was correct?
– Tylersansan
yesterday
Expanding on @naruto's answer below: The tense of the final verb (or copula in this case) sets the tone (tense) for the entire sentence, thereby changing 'Annie is pointing' to 'Annie was pointing'. So, while there is an influence, it is not in the category of modification.
– user27280
yesterday
Expanding on @naruto's answer below: The tense of the final verb (or copula in this case) sets the tone (tense) for the entire sentence, thereby changing 'Annie is pointing' to 'Annie was pointing'. So, while there is an influence, it is not in the category of modification.
– user27280
yesterday
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
This is a rather simple example of a cleft sentence.
アニーは一本のなわばしごを指さしていた。
Annie was pointing to a long rope ladder.
アニーが指さしているのは、一本のなわばしごだった。
It was a long rope ladder that Annie was pointing to.
Grammatically speaking, だった is modifying nothing.
Note: This の/it is referring to a tangible object, so in this case, it is possible to translate the sentence using the simple grammar of relative clause: "The thing (=の) Annie was pointing to was a long rope ladder." But cleft sentence is a grammaticalized concept that has a wider range of usages.
answered yesterday
narutonaruto
157k8149291
Or simply "What Annie was pointing to ..."
– Mathieu Bouville
yesterday
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "257"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fjapanese.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f65329%2fconfusion-on-use-of-%25e3%2581%25a0%25e3%2581%25a3%25e3%2581%259f-with-sentence-that-uses-nominalized-verb%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
This is a rather simple example of a cleft sentence.
アニーは一本のなわばしごを指さしていた。
Annie was pointing to a long rope ladder.
アニーが指さしているのは、一本のなわばしごだった。
It was a long rope ladder that Annie was pointing to.
Grammatically speaking, だった is modifying nothing.
Note: This の/it is referring to a tangible object, so in this case, it is possible to translate the sentence using the simple grammar of relative clause: "The thing (=の) Annie was pointing to was a long rope ladder." But cleft sentence is a grammaticalized concept that has a wider range of usages.
answered yesterday
narutonaruto
157k8149291
Or simply "What Annie was pointing to ..."
– Mathieu Bouville
yesterday
add a comment |
This is a rather simple example of a cleft sentence.
アニーは一本のなわばしごを指さしていた。
Annie was pointing to a long rope ladder.
アニーが指さしているのは、一本のなわばしごだった。
It was a long rope ladder that Annie was pointing to.
Grammatically speaking, だった is modifying nothing.
Note: This の/it is referring to a tangible object, so in this case, it is possible to translate the sentence using the simple grammar of relative clause: "The thing (=の) Annie was pointing to was a long rope ladder." But cleft sentence is a grammaticalized concept that has a wider range of usages.
answered yesterday
narutonaruto
157k8149291
Or simply "What Annie was pointing to ..."
– Mathieu Bouville
yesterday
add a comment |
This is a rather simple example of a cleft sentence.
アニーは一本のなわばしごを指さしていた。
Annie was pointing to a long rope ladder.
アニーが指さしているのは、一本のなわばしごだった。
It was a long rope ladder that Annie was pointing to.
Grammatically speaking, だった is modifying nothing.
Note: This の/it is referring to a tangible object, so in this case, it is possible to translate the sentence using the simple grammar of relative clause: "The thing (=の) Annie was pointing to was a long rope ladder." But cleft sentence is a grammaticalized concept that has a wider range of usages.
answered yesterday
narutonaruto
157k8149291
This is a rather simple example of a cleft sentence.
アニーは一本のなわばしごを指さしていた。
Annie was pointing to a long rope ladder.
アニーが指さしているのは、一本のなわばしごだった。
It was a long rope ladder that Annie was pointing to.
Grammatically speaking, だった is modifying nothing.
Note: This の/it is referring to a tangible object, so in this case, it is possible to translate the sentence using the simple grammar of relative clause: "The thing (=の) Annie was pointing to was a long rope ladder." But cleft sentence is a grammaticalized concept that has a wider range of usages.
answered yesterday
narutonaruto
157k8149291
edited yesterday
answered yesterday
narutonaruto
157k8149291
answered yesterday
narutonaruto
157k8149291
answered yesterday
narutonaruto
157k8149291
157k8149291
Or simply "What Annie was pointing to ..."
– Mathieu Bouville
yesterday
add a comment |
Or simply "What Annie was pointing to ..."
– Mathieu Bouville
yesterday
Or simply "What Annie was pointing to ..."
– Mathieu Bouville
yesterday
Or simply "What Annie was pointing to ..."
– Mathieu Bouville
yesterday
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Japanese Language Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fjapanese.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f65329%2fconfusion-on-use-of-%25e3%2581%25a0%25e3%2581%25a3%25e3%2581%259f-with-sentence-that-uses-nominalized-verb%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
I'm not sure if you're really interested in the technical terms, but the question as phrased doesn't quite make sense. It doesn't modify anything, it's predicating. Predicates and modifiers are two different things.
– snailboat♦
yesterday
1
'The thing Annie was pointing at' or 'What Annie was pointing at' seems more in line with the original text. Where are you seeing the word 'long'?
– user27280
yesterday
@user27280 I thought this was implied by 一本 (one long cylindrical thing). Maybe this is wrong of me. You are right, there is no word that directly means long in this sentence
– Tylersansan
yesterday
@snailboat I'm all for technical if it can help me understand. Not sure if this is right, but assuming a predicate is defined as "the part that tells us what the subject does or is". Does this mean だった is predicating Annie and my first assumption was correct?
– Tylersansan
yesterday
Expanding on @naruto's answer below: The tense of the final verb (or copula in this case) sets the tone (tense) for the entire sentence, thereby changing 'Annie is pointing' to 'Annie was pointing'. So, while there is an influence, it is not in the category of modification.
– user27280
yesterday