Why is the US referred to as “the Union” in “State of the Union”?












1















I wonder about the use of the word "Union" in the name "State of the Union", which is the US President's annual address to Congress. The phrase appears in the Constitution:




He [the President] shall from time to time give to the Congress
Information on the State of the Union,




However, the phrase apparently fell out of favor for many years; according to the Senate's FAQ




The message was generally known as “the President’s Annual Message to Congress”
until well into the 20th century. Although some historians suggest that the phrase “State
of the Union” emerged only after World War II, President Franklin Roosevelt’s 1934
message is identified in his papers as his “Annual Message to Congress on the State of
the Union.” According to the Office of the Clerk of the House of Representatives, it was
known informally as the State of the Union Address from 1942 to 1946, and has been
known “generally” by the same name since 1947.




The choice of the word "union" seems to emphasize that it's about how the states are getting together; this would seem to be more appropriate during the period when the country was forming, to refer to the process of uniting. Why isn't it "State of the Nation" or "State of the Country"? The states also have similar traditions where the governor gives an annual address, and they generally call it "State of the State" (or "State of the Commonwealth" in a few states that identify themselves as such).



Oxford Living Dictionary does include this definition of "Union":




4.1 The United States, especially from its founding by the original thirteen states in 1787–90 to the secession of the Confederate states in 1860–1.




But in my experience, this usage is extremely rare; I can't actually think of any usage other than this specific phrase. Was it a more common way to refer to the US a century ago, and it has now become entrenched in the name of the speech, while falling into disuse in other contexts?



I assume it fell out of favor to refer to the entire nation because during the Civil War it was used to refer to the northern states, so it seems like it would have had a bad connotation to southerners. Could it be that by the 1930's there were few people still alive who lived through that war, so it was acceptable to resurrect it in a more positive light? Yet it's been about as long now since World War II, and few would think of trying to use Nazi, Fascist, or Axis positively.










share|improve this question























  • Not sure it's about the English language. There is a Politics as well, btw.

    – Kris
    23 hours ago











  • And even History for that matter.

    – Kris
    23 hours ago






  • 1





    This is the second time I've asked a question about a word related to politics, and it's been referred to Politics. I don't agree that terminology use by the general public is a question about the politics itself. And by your logic, any etymology question could be considered history (it's the history of the word's evolution).

    – Barmar
    23 hours ago











  • "and it's been referred to Politics" -- naturally. My logic was that the "reason" can only be found in politics and not in linguistics/ language change.

    – Kris
    23 hours ago


















1















I wonder about the use of the word "Union" in the name "State of the Union", which is the US President's annual address to Congress. The phrase appears in the Constitution:




He [the President] shall from time to time give to the Congress
Information on the State of the Union,




However, the phrase apparently fell out of favor for many years; according to the Senate's FAQ




The message was generally known as “the President’s Annual Message to Congress”
until well into the 20th century. Although some historians suggest that the phrase “State
of the Union” emerged only after World War II, President Franklin Roosevelt’s 1934
message is identified in his papers as his “Annual Message to Congress on the State of
the Union.” According to the Office of the Clerk of the House of Representatives, it was
known informally as the State of the Union Address from 1942 to 1946, and has been
known “generally” by the same name since 1947.




The choice of the word "union" seems to emphasize that it's about how the states are getting together; this would seem to be more appropriate during the period when the country was forming, to refer to the process of uniting. Why isn't it "State of the Nation" or "State of the Country"? The states also have similar traditions where the governor gives an annual address, and they generally call it "State of the State" (or "State of the Commonwealth" in a few states that identify themselves as such).



Oxford Living Dictionary does include this definition of "Union":




4.1 The United States, especially from its founding by the original thirteen states in 1787–90 to the secession of the Confederate states in 1860–1.




But in my experience, this usage is extremely rare; I can't actually think of any usage other than this specific phrase. Was it a more common way to refer to the US a century ago, and it has now become entrenched in the name of the speech, while falling into disuse in other contexts?



I assume it fell out of favor to refer to the entire nation because during the Civil War it was used to refer to the northern states, so it seems like it would have had a bad connotation to southerners. Could it be that by the 1930's there were few people still alive who lived through that war, so it was acceptable to resurrect it in a more positive light? Yet it's been about as long now since World War II, and few would think of trying to use Nazi, Fascist, or Axis positively.










share|improve this question























  • Not sure it's about the English language. There is a Politics as well, btw.

    – Kris
    23 hours ago











  • And even History for that matter.

    – Kris
    23 hours ago






  • 1





    This is the second time I've asked a question about a word related to politics, and it's been referred to Politics. I don't agree that terminology use by the general public is a question about the politics itself. And by your logic, any etymology question could be considered history (it's the history of the word's evolution).

    – Barmar
    23 hours ago











  • "and it's been referred to Politics" -- naturally. My logic was that the "reason" can only be found in politics and not in linguistics/ language change.

    – Kris
    23 hours ago
















1












1








1








I wonder about the use of the word "Union" in the name "State of the Union", which is the US President's annual address to Congress. The phrase appears in the Constitution:




He [the President] shall from time to time give to the Congress
Information on the State of the Union,




However, the phrase apparently fell out of favor for many years; according to the Senate's FAQ




The message was generally known as “the President’s Annual Message to Congress”
until well into the 20th century. Although some historians suggest that the phrase “State
of the Union” emerged only after World War II, President Franklin Roosevelt’s 1934
message is identified in his papers as his “Annual Message to Congress on the State of
the Union.” According to the Office of the Clerk of the House of Representatives, it was
known informally as the State of the Union Address from 1942 to 1946, and has been
known “generally” by the same name since 1947.




The choice of the word "union" seems to emphasize that it's about how the states are getting together; this would seem to be more appropriate during the period when the country was forming, to refer to the process of uniting. Why isn't it "State of the Nation" or "State of the Country"? The states also have similar traditions where the governor gives an annual address, and they generally call it "State of the State" (or "State of the Commonwealth" in a few states that identify themselves as such).



Oxford Living Dictionary does include this definition of "Union":




4.1 The United States, especially from its founding by the original thirteen states in 1787–90 to the secession of the Confederate states in 1860–1.




But in my experience, this usage is extremely rare; I can't actually think of any usage other than this specific phrase. Was it a more common way to refer to the US a century ago, and it has now become entrenched in the name of the speech, while falling into disuse in other contexts?



I assume it fell out of favor to refer to the entire nation because during the Civil War it was used to refer to the northern states, so it seems like it would have had a bad connotation to southerners. Could it be that by the 1930's there were few people still alive who lived through that war, so it was acceptable to resurrect it in a more positive light? Yet it's been about as long now since World War II, and few would think of trying to use Nazi, Fascist, or Axis positively.










share|improve this question














I wonder about the use of the word "Union" in the name "State of the Union", which is the US President's annual address to Congress. The phrase appears in the Constitution:




He [the President] shall from time to time give to the Congress
Information on the State of the Union,




However, the phrase apparently fell out of favor for many years; according to the Senate's FAQ




The message was generally known as “the President’s Annual Message to Congress”
until well into the 20th century. Although some historians suggest that the phrase “State
of the Union” emerged only after World War II, President Franklin Roosevelt’s 1934
message is identified in his papers as his “Annual Message to Congress on the State of
the Union.” According to the Office of the Clerk of the House of Representatives, it was
known informally as the State of the Union Address from 1942 to 1946, and has been
known “generally” by the same name since 1947.




The choice of the word "union" seems to emphasize that it's about how the states are getting together; this would seem to be more appropriate during the period when the country was forming, to refer to the process of uniting. Why isn't it "State of the Nation" or "State of the Country"? The states also have similar traditions where the governor gives an annual address, and they generally call it "State of the State" (or "State of the Commonwealth" in a few states that identify themselves as such).



Oxford Living Dictionary does include this definition of "Union":




4.1 The United States, especially from its founding by the original thirteen states in 1787–90 to the secession of the Confederate states in 1860–1.




But in my experience, this usage is extremely rare; I can't actually think of any usage other than this specific phrase. Was it a more common way to refer to the US a century ago, and it has now become entrenched in the name of the speech, while falling into disuse in other contexts?



I assume it fell out of favor to refer to the entire nation because during the Civil War it was used to refer to the northern states, so it seems like it would have had a bad connotation to southerners. Could it be that by the 1930's there were few people still alive who lived through that war, so it was acceptable to resurrect it in a more positive light? Yet it's been about as long now since World War II, and few would think of trying to use Nazi, Fascist, or Axis positively.







expressions usage contemporary-english






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked 23 hours ago









BarmarBarmar

9,7651429




9,7651429













  • Not sure it's about the English language. There is a Politics as well, btw.

    – Kris
    23 hours ago











  • And even History for that matter.

    – Kris
    23 hours ago






  • 1





    This is the second time I've asked a question about a word related to politics, and it's been referred to Politics. I don't agree that terminology use by the general public is a question about the politics itself. And by your logic, any etymology question could be considered history (it's the history of the word's evolution).

    – Barmar
    23 hours ago











  • "and it's been referred to Politics" -- naturally. My logic was that the "reason" can only be found in politics and not in linguistics/ language change.

    – Kris
    23 hours ago





















  • Not sure it's about the English language. There is a Politics as well, btw.

    – Kris
    23 hours ago











  • And even History for that matter.

    – Kris
    23 hours ago






  • 1





    This is the second time I've asked a question about a word related to politics, and it's been referred to Politics. I don't agree that terminology use by the general public is a question about the politics itself. And by your logic, any etymology question could be considered history (it's the history of the word's evolution).

    – Barmar
    23 hours ago











  • "and it's been referred to Politics" -- naturally. My logic was that the "reason" can only be found in politics and not in linguistics/ language change.

    – Kris
    23 hours ago



















Not sure it's about the English language. There is a Politics as well, btw.

– Kris
23 hours ago





Not sure it's about the English language. There is a Politics as well, btw.

– Kris
23 hours ago













And even History for that matter.

– Kris
23 hours ago





And even History for that matter.

– Kris
23 hours ago




1




1





This is the second time I've asked a question about a word related to politics, and it's been referred to Politics. I don't agree that terminology use by the general public is a question about the politics itself. And by your logic, any etymology question could be considered history (it's the history of the word's evolution).

– Barmar
23 hours ago





This is the second time I've asked a question about a word related to politics, and it's been referred to Politics. I don't agree that terminology use by the general public is a question about the politics itself. And by your logic, any etymology question could be considered history (it's the history of the word's evolution).

– Barmar
23 hours ago













"and it's been referred to Politics" -- naturally. My logic was that the "reason" can only be found in politics and not in linguistics/ language change.

– Kris
23 hours ago







"and it's been referred to Politics" -- naturally. My logic was that the "reason" can only be found in politics and not in linguistics/ language change.

– Kris
23 hours ago












0






active

oldest

votes











Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "97"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f484329%2fwhy-is-the-us-referred-to-as-the-union-in-state-of-the-union%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























0






active

oldest

votes








0






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes
















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language & Usage Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f484329%2fwhy-is-the-us-referred-to-as-the-union-in-state-of-the-union%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

If I really need a card on my start hand, how many mulligans make sense? [duplicate]

Alcedinidae

Can an atomic nucleus contain both particles and antiparticles? [duplicate]