How to set GDB read watchpoint in registers?












0















I'm trying to set a read watch point in registers.
By reading the user manual. I understood how to set watchpoint in registers



watch [-l|-location] expr [thread thread-id] [mask maskvalue]



Set a watchpoint for an expression. GDB will break when the expression expr is written into by the program and its value changes.



For example: watch $r1. It means GDB will break when the register r1 is written into by the program and its value changes. It works!



But when I use: rwatch $r1, the gdb's reply is "Expression cannot be implemented with read/access watchpoint."



So I want to know how can I set a read watch point in registers. or are There any ways to break when the register is read by the program?



Many Thanks!










share|improve this question





























    0















    I'm trying to set a read watch point in registers.
    By reading the user manual. I understood how to set watchpoint in registers



    watch [-l|-location] expr [thread thread-id] [mask maskvalue]



    Set a watchpoint for an expression. GDB will break when the expression expr is written into by the program and its value changes.



    For example: watch $r1. It means GDB will break when the register r1 is written into by the program and its value changes. It works!



    But when I use: rwatch $r1, the gdb's reply is "Expression cannot be implemented with read/access watchpoint."



    So I want to know how can I set a read watch point in registers. or are There any ways to break when the register is read by the program?



    Many Thanks!










    share|improve this question



























      0












      0








      0








      I'm trying to set a read watch point in registers.
      By reading the user manual. I understood how to set watchpoint in registers



      watch [-l|-location] expr [thread thread-id] [mask maskvalue]



      Set a watchpoint for an expression. GDB will break when the expression expr is written into by the program and its value changes.



      For example: watch $r1. It means GDB will break when the register r1 is written into by the program and its value changes. It works!



      But when I use: rwatch $r1, the gdb's reply is "Expression cannot be implemented with read/access watchpoint."



      So I want to know how can I set a read watch point in registers. or are There any ways to break when the register is read by the program?



      Many Thanks!










      share|improve this question
















      I'm trying to set a read watch point in registers.
      By reading the user manual. I understood how to set watchpoint in registers



      watch [-l|-location] expr [thread thread-id] [mask maskvalue]



      Set a watchpoint for an expression. GDB will break when the expression expr is written into by the program and its value changes.



      For example: watch $r1. It means GDB will break when the register r1 is written into by the program and its value changes. It works!



      But when I use: rwatch $r1, the gdb's reply is "Expression cannot be implemented with read/access watchpoint."



      So I want to know how can I set a read watch point in registers. or are There any ways to break when the register is read by the program?



      Many Thanks!







      debugging gdb breakpoints watchpoint






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited Nov 21 '18 at 16:59









      585connor

      3,571104479




      3,571104479










      asked Nov 21 '18 at 16:29









      ZzestZzest

      1




      1
























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          0















          So I want to know how can I set a read watch point in registers




          I don't believe GDB provides any facility to do so.



          When you set a watchpoint on memory location, GDB can implement it very efficiently on platforms that provide special debug registers (e.g. x86_64). The program then runs at full speed, until the location is accessed.



          On platforms that don't provide debug registers, GDB has to single-step the program, and compare the value at location with a value it previously recorded. This is very slow (but sometimes useful), and can only work for write watchpoints for obvious reason.



          Since registers don't have a "location", when you set a watchpoint on register, GDB performs the same "single step and compare with previous value" dance. And the read watchpoint can't work at all.



          What you ask for could be implemented in GDB: single step and examine every instruction -- does it access the named register or not?



          But the need for this is very rare, and the implementation complexity is quite high, so I don't think anybody would be willing to actually implement this.






          share|improve this answer























            Your Answer






            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
            StackExchange.snippets.init();
            });
            });
            }, "code-snippets");

            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "1"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53416540%2fhow-to-set-gdb-read-watchpoint-in-registers%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            0















            So I want to know how can I set a read watch point in registers




            I don't believe GDB provides any facility to do so.



            When you set a watchpoint on memory location, GDB can implement it very efficiently on platforms that provide special debug registers (e.g. x86_64). The program then runs at full speed, until the location is accessed.



            On platforms that don't provide debug registers, GDB has to single-step the program, and compare the value at location with a value it previously recorded. This is very slow (but sometimes useful), and can only work for write watchpoints for obvious reason.



            Since registers don't have a "location", when you set a watchpoint on register, GDB performs the same "single step and compare with previous value" dance. And the read watchpoint can't work at all.



            What you ask for could be implemented in GDB: single step and examine every instruction -- does it access the named register or not?



            But the need for this is very rare, and the implementation complexity is quite high, so I don't think anybody would be willing to actually implement this.






            share|improve this answer




























              0















              So I want to know how can I set a read watch point in registers




              I don't believe GDB provides any facility to do so.



              When you set a watchpoint on memory location, GDB can implement it very efficiently on platforms that provide special debug registers (e.g. x86_64). The program then runs at full speed, until the location is accessed.



              On platforms that don't provide debug registers, GDB has to single-step the program, and compare the value at location with a value it previously recorded. This is very slow (but sometimes useful), and can only work for write watchpoints for obvious reason.



              Since registers don't have a "location", when you set a watchpoint on register, GDB performs the same "single step and compare with previous value" dance. And the read watchpoint can't work at all.



              What you ask for could be implemented in GDB: single step and examine every instruction -- does it access the named register or not?



              But the need for this is very rare, and the implementation complexity is quite high, so I don't think anybody would be willing to actually implement this.






              share|improve this answer


























                0












                0








                0








                So I want to know how can I set a read watch point in registers




                I don't believe GDB provides any facility to do so.



                When you set a watchpoint on memory location, GDB can implement it very efficiently on platforms that provide special debug registers (e.g. x86_64). The program then runs at full speed, until the location is accessed.



                On platforms that don't provide debug registers, GDB has to single-step the program, and compare the value at location with a value it previously recorded. This is very slow (but sometimes useful), and can only work for write watchpoints for obvious reason.



                Since registers don't have a "location", when you set a watchpoint on register, GDB performs the same "single step and compare with previous value" dance. And the read watchpoint can't work at all.



                What you ask for could be implemented in GDB: single step and examine every instruction -- does it access the named register or not?



                But the need for this is very rare, and the implementation complexity is quite high, so I don't think anybody would be willing to actually implement this.






                share|improve this answer














                So I want to know how can I set a read watch point in registers




                I don't believe GDB provides any facility to do so.



                When you set a watchpoint on memory location, GDB can implement it very efficiently on platforms that provide special debug registers (e.g. x86_64). The program then runs at full speed, until the location is accessed.



                On platforms that don't provide debug registers, GDB has to single-step the program, and compare the value at location with a value it previously recorded. This is very slow (but sometimes useful), and can only work for write watchpoints for obvious reason.



                Since registers don't have a "location", when you set a watchpoint on register, GDB performs the same "single step and compare with previous value" dance. And the read watchpoint can't work at all.



                What you ask for could be implemented in GDB: single step and examine every instruction -- does it access the named register or not?



                But the need for this is very rare, and the implementation complexity is quite high, so I don't think anybody would be willing to actually implement this.







                share|improve this answer












                share|improve this answer



                share|improve this answer










                answered Nov 22 '18 at 4:34









                Employed RussianEmployed Russian

                124k20166236




                124k20166236






























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded




















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53416540%2fhow-to-set-gdb-read-watchpoint-in-registers%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    If I really need a card on my start hand, how many mulligans make sense? [duplicate]

                    Alcedinidae

                    Can an atomic nucleus contain both particles and antiparticles? [duplicate]