Are there negative impacts of having DHT nodes connections 24/7?












0















I have a qBittorrent server at home that I use sometimes to download ISOs to test new Linux distros (amongst other things). The server is running 24/7 even when there are no active torrents in it. I noticed, however, that even if the server isn't doing anything, it's maintaining between 350 and 400 DHT nodes connected. I toyed a little bit with netstat and couldn't find these connections.



My question is as follows: are there any negative impact of keeping my torrenting server running 24/7 even when there are no torrents downloading/seeding? Do DHT nodes connections have any bandwidth impact whatsoever (even the tiniest) on my home network/router?










share|improve this question



























    0















    I have a qBittorrent server at home that I use sometimes to download ISOs to test new Linux distros (amongst other things). The server is running 24/7 even when there are no active torrents in it. I noticed, however, that even if the server isn't doing anything, it's maintaining between 350 and 400 DHT nodes connected. I toyed a little bit with netstat and couldn't find these connections.



    My question is as follows: are there any negative impact of keeping my torrenting server running 24/7 even when there are no torrents downloading/seeding? Do DHT nodes connections have any bandwidth impact whatsoever (even the tiniest) on my home network/router?










    share|improve this question

























      0












      0








      0








      I have a qBittorrent server at home that I use sometimes to download ISOs to test new Linux distros (amongst other things). The server is running 24/7 even when there are no active torrents in it. I noticed, however, that even if the server isn't doing anything, it's maintaining between 350 and 400 DHT nodes connected. I toyed a little bit with netstat and couldn't find these connections.



      My question is as follows: are there any negative impact of keeping my torrenting server running 24/7 even when there are no torrents downloading/seeding? Do DHT nodes connections have any bandwidth impact whatsoever (even the tiniest) on my home network/router?










      share|improve this question














      I have a qBittorrent server at home that I use sometimes to download ISOs to test new Linux distros (amongst other things). The server is running 24/7 even when there are no active torrents in it. I noticed, however, that even if the server isn't doing anything, it's maintaining between 350 and 400 DHT nodes connected. I toyed a little bit with netstat and couldn't find these connections.



      My question is as follows: are there any negative impact of keeping my torrenting server running 24/7 even when there are no torrents downloading/seeding? Do DHT nodes connections have any bandwidth impact whatsoever (even the tiniest) on my home network/router?







      networking bittorrent






      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question











      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question










      asked Jan 21 at 8:45









      dnLLdnLL

      284415




      284415






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          1














          The bittorrent DHT is a UDP-based protocol, so it does not have connections per se. On your machine itself it will only keep a single UDP socket open to operate.



          The traffic ranges in the kilobytes per second at most, so it should not have any bandwidth or latency impact on modern broadband connections.



          There is one considerable resource consumption: Stateful firewalls and NAT devices - such as home routers or CGNATs operated by your ISP - will keep an entry in a temporary table for each response-reply sent to random hosts on the DHT.



          On very cheap devices or with skimpy ISPs this can saturate the table and lead to packet drops when attempting to establish new connections, if you're experiencing this problem it would most likely manifest in DNS lookups failing or many different websites taking several attempts to load.






          share|improve this answer























            Your Answer








            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "3"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsuperuser.com%2fquestions%2f1396525%2fare-there-negative-impacts-of-having-dht-nodes-connections-24-7%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            1














            The bittorrent DHT is a UDP-based protocol, so it does not have connections per se. On your machine itself it will only keep a single UDP socket open to operate.



            The traffic ranges in the kilobytes per second at most, so it should not have any bandwidth or latency impact on modern broadband connections.



            There is one considerable resource consumption: Stateful firewalls and NAT devices - such as home routers or CGNATs operated by your ISP - will keep an entry in a temporary table for each response-reply sent to random hosts on the DHT.



            On very cheap devices or with skimpy ISPs this can saturate the table and lead to packet drops when attempting to establish new connections, if you're experiencing this problem it would most likely manifest in DNS lookups failing or many different websites taking several attempts to load.






            share|improve this answer




























              1














              The bittorrent DHT is a UDP-based protocol, so it does not have connections per se. On your machine itself it will only keep a single UDP socket open to operate.



              The traffic ranges in the kilobytes per second at most, so it should not have any bandwidth or latency impact on modern broadband connections.



              There is one considerable resource consumption: Stateful firewalls and NAT devices - such as home routers or CGNATs operated by your ISP - will keep an entry in a temporary table for each response-reply sent to random hosts on the DHT.



              On very cheap devices or with skimpy ISPs this can saturate the table and lead to packet drops when attempting to establish new connections, if you're experiencing this problem it would most likely manifest in DNS lookups failing or many different websites taking several attempts to load.






              share|improve this answer


























                1












                1








                1







                The bittorrent DHT is a UDP-based protocol, so it does not have connections per se. On your machine itself it will only keep a single UDP socket open to operate.



                The traffic ranges in the kilobytes per second at most, so it should not have any bandwidth or latency impact on modern broadband connections.



                There is one considerable resource consumption: Stateful firewalls and NAT devices - such as home routers or CGNATs operated by your ISP - will keep an entry in a temporary table for each response-reply sent to random hosts on the DHT.



                On very cheap devices or with skimpy ISPs this can saturate the table and lead to packet drops when attempting to establish new connections, if you're experiencing this problem it would most likely manifest in DNS lookups failing or many different websites taking several attempts to load.






                share|improve this answer













                The bittorrent DHT is a UDP-based protocol, so it does not have connections per se. On your machine itself it will only keep a single UDP socket open to operate.



                The traffic ranges in the kilobytes per second at most, so it should not have any bandwidth or latency impact on modern broadband connections.



                There is one considerable resource consumption: Stateful firewalls and NAT devices - such as home routers or CGNATs operated by your ISP - will keep an entry in a temporary table for each response-reply sent to random hosts on the DHT.



                On very cheap devices or with skimpy ISPs this can saturate the table and lead to packet drops when attempting to establish new connections, if you're experiencing this problem it would most likely manifest in DNS lookups failing or many different websites taking several attempts to load.







                share|improve this answer












                share|improve this answer



                share|improve this answer










                answered yesterday









                the8472the8472

                337113




                337113






























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded




















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Super User!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsuperuser.com%2fquestions%2f1396525%2fare-there-negative-impacts-of-having-dht-nodes-connections-24-7%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    "Incorrect syntax near the keyword 'ON'. (on update cascade, on delete cascade,)

                    Alcedinidae

                    Origin of the phrase “under your belt”?