Can Sentinel at Death's Door and Cutting Words combine to make a critical hit miss?
$begingroup$
We already know from Sage Advice and other answers to other questions that by RAI, (and I guess RAW too), Cutting Words (and Bane) don't work on critical hits, though in the case of Cutting Words they can still reduce the damage by an amount.
The Grave Domain's 6th level feature, Sentinel at Death's Door states that:
As a reaction when you or a creature you can see within 30 feet of you suffers a critical hit, you can turn that hit into a normal hit. Any effects triggered by a critical hit are canceled.
Does that mean that, since it is no longer a critical hit, that Cutting Words can now apply to it properly?
A follow up question: If the above is true then if a Bard cast Cutting Words before the Cleric used Sentinel at Death's Door on a critical hit, does Cutting Words still apply?
dnd-5e class-feature cleric bard critical-hit
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
We already know from Sage Advice and other answers to other questions that by RAI, (and I guess RAW too), Cutting Words (and Bane) don't work on critical hits, though in the case of Cutting Words they can still reduce the damage by an amount.
The Grave Domain's 6th level feature, Sentinel at Death's Door states that:
As a reaction when you or a creature you can see within 30 feet of you suffers a critical hit, you can turn that hit into a normal hit. Any effects triggered by a critical hit are canceled.
Does that mean that, since it is no longer a critical hit, that Cutting Words can now apply to it properly?
A follow up question: If the above is true then if a Bard cast Cutting Words before the Cleric used Sentinel at Death's Door on a critical hit, does Cutting Words still apply?
dnd-5e class-feature cleric bard critical-hit
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
We already know from Sage Advice and other answers to other questions that by RAI, (and I guess RAW too), Cutting Words (and Bane) don't work on critical hits, though in the case of Cutting Words they can still reduce the damage by an amount.
The Grave Domain's 6th level feature, Sentinel at Death's Door states that:
As a reaction when you or a creature you can see within 30 feet of you suffers a critical hit, you can turn that hit into a normal hit. Any effects triggered by a critical hit are canceled.
Does that mean that, since it is no longer a critical hit, that Cutting Words can now apply to it properly?
A follow up question: If the above is true then if a Bard cast Cutting Words before the Cleric used Sentinel at Death's Door on a critical hit, does Cutting Words still apply?
dnd-5e class-feature cleric bard critical-hit
$endgroup$
We already know from Sage Advice and other answers to other questions that by RAI, (and I guess RAW too), Cutting Words (and Bane) don't work on critical hits, though in the case of Cutting Words they can still reduce the damage by an amount.
The Grave Domain's 6th level feature, Sentinel at Death's Door states that:
As a reaction when you or a creature you can see within 30 feet of you suffers a critical hit, you can turn that hit into a normal hit. Any effects triggered by a critical hit are canceled.
Does that mean that, since it is no longer a critical hit, that Cutting Words can now apply to it properly?
A follow up question: If the above is true then if a Bard cast Cutting Words before the Cleric used Sentinel at Death's Door on a critical hit, does Cutting Words still apply?
dnd-5e class-feature cleric bard critical-hit
dnd-5e class-feature cleric bard critical-hit
edited 9 hours ago
Tiggerous
10.1k44483
10.1k44483
asked 11 hours ago
guessguess
33018
33018
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Yes, these two features combined could potenially cause a critical hit to miss.
As quoted in your question, Sentinel at Death's Door, on it's own, turns a critical hit into a normal hit.
Cutting Words, crucially, can be used:
[...] after the creature makes its roll, but before the DM determines whether the attack roll or ability check succeeds or fails, or before the creature deals its damage. (emphasis mine)
Under normal circumstances an attack roll of 20 will always succeed:
If the d20 roll for an attack is a 20, the attack hits regardless of any modifiers or the target's AC. This is called a critical hit [...]
So, if a critical hit 'hits regardless of any modifiers or the target's AC' the fact that this is no longer a critical hit means it no longer 'hits regardless of any modifiers or the target's AC' and is now a viable target for cutting words.
Cutting words could not have been applied 'after the creature makes its roll, but before the DM determines whether the attack roll or ability check succeeds or fails' because as soon as a 20 was rolled it was classed as a critical hit and the DM did not need to determine whether it would succeed or fail - it was an automatic success.
However, once the Grave domain cleric has used their reaction to negate the critical hit there is a second opportunity to use Cutting Words 'before the creature deals its damage'. So, now the Lore Bard can use Cutting Words to try and cause the attack to miss.
I believe this is balanced as it has a (relatively) high opportunity cost.
The party will require both a Grave domain Cleric (level 6) and a Lore Bard (level 3) to have access to both of these features. Both abilities consume each player's reaction so a multiclass Cleric/Bard could not do this on their own. Sentinel at Death's Door can be used a limited number of times per long rest and Cutting Words spends one use of Bardic Inspiration die.
Cutting Words used this way also has a higher than average degree of failure. By which I mean that, statistically, the Bard will likely have to roll pretty high on their Bardic Inspiration die, in order to cancel a hit from a 20 on the dice, plus any modifiers the attacker adds, in order to bring the total below the AC of the attack's target.
A Bard who is playing the percentages might prefer to save their Bardic Inspiration to use when it is statistically most likely to cancel damage.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["\$", "\$"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "122"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f143034%2fcan-sentinel-at-deaths-door-and-cutting-words-combine-to-make-a-critical-hit-mi%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Yes, these two features combined could potenially cause a critical hit to miss.
As quoted in your question, Sentinel at Death's Door, on it's own, turns a critical hit into a normal hit.
Cutting Words, crucially, can be used:
[...] after the creature makes its roll, but before the DM determines whether the attack roll or ability check succeeds or fails, or before the creature deals its damage. (emphasis mine)
Under normal circumstances an attack roll of 20 will always succeed:
If the d20 roll for an attack is a 20, the attack hits regardless of any modifiers or the target's AC. This is called a critical hit [...]
So, if a critical hit 'hits regardless of any modifiers or the target's AC' the fact that this is no longer a critical hit means it no longer 'hits regardless of any modifiers or the target's AC' and is now a viable target for cutting words.
Cutting words could not have been applied 'after the creature makes its roll, but before the DM determines whether the attack roll or ability check succeeds or fails' because as soon as a 20 was rolled it was classed as a critical hit and the DM did not need to determine whether it would succeed or fail - it was an automatic success.
However, once the Grave domain cleric has used their reaction to negate the critical hit there is a second opportunity to use Cutting Words 'before the creature deals its damage'. So, now the Lore Bard can use Cutting Words to try and cause the attack to miss.
I believe this is balanced as it has a (relatively) high opportunity cost.
The party will require both a Grave domain Cleric (level 6) and a Lore Bard (level 3) to have access to both of these features. Both abilities consume each player's reaction so a multiclass Cleric/Bard could not do this on their own. Sentinel at Death's Door can be used a limited number of times per long rest and Cutting Words spends one use of Bardic Inspiration die.
Cutting Words used this way also has a higher than average degree of failure. By which I mean that, statistically, the Bard will likely have to roll pretty high on their Bardic Inspiration die, in order to cancel a hit from a 20 on the dice, plus any modifiers the attacker adds, in order to bring the total below the AC of the attack's target.
A Bard who is playing the percentages might prefer to save their Bardic Inspiration to use when it is statistically most likely to cancel damage.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Yes, these two features combined could potenially cause a critical hit to miss.
As quoted in your question, Sentinel at Death's Door, on it's own, turns a critical hit into a normal hit.
Cutting Words, crucially, can be used:
[...] after the creature makes its roll, but before the DM determines whether the attack roll or ability check succeeds or fails, or before the creature deals its damage. (emphasis mine)
Under normal circumstances an attack roll of 20 will always succeed:
If the d20 roll for an attack is a 20, the attack hits regardless of any modifiers or the target's AC. This is called a critical hit [...]
So, if a critical hit 'hits regardless of any modifiers or the target's AC' the fact that this is no longer a critical hit means it no longer 'hits regardless of any modifiers or the target's AC' and is now a viable target for cutting words.
Cutting words could not have been applied 'after the creature makes its roll, but before the DM determines whether the attack roll or ability check succeeds or fails' because as soon as a 20 was rolled it was classed as a critical hit and the DM did not need to determine whether it would succeed or fail - it was an automatic success.
However, once the Grave domain cleric has used their reaction to negate the critical hit there is a second opportunity to use Cutting Words 'before the creature deals its damage'. So, now the Lore Bard can use Cutting Words to try and cause the attack to miss.
I believe this is balanced as it has a (relatively) high opportunity cost.
The party will require both a Grave domain Cleric (level 6) and a Lore Bard (level 3) to have access to both of these features. Both abilities consume each player's reaction so a multiclass Cleric/Bard could not do this on their own. Sentinel at Death's Door can be used a limited number of times per long rest and Cutting Words spends one use of Bardic Inspiration die.
Cutting Words used this way also has a higher than average degree of failure. By which I mean that, statistically, the Bard will likely have to roll pretty high on their Bardic Inspiration die, in order to cancel a hit from a 20 on the dice, plus any modifiers the attacker adds, in order to bring the total below the AC of the attack's target.
A Bard who is playing the percentages might prefer to save their Bardic Inspiration to use when it is statistically most likely to cancel damage.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Yes, these two features combined could potenially cause a critical hit to miss.
As quoted in your question, Sentinel at Death's Door, on it's own, turns a critical hit into a normal hit.
Cutting Words, crucially, can be used:
[...] after the creature makes its roll, but before the DM determines whether the attack roll or ability check succeeds or fails, or before the creature deals its damage. (emphasis mine)
Under normal circumstances an attack roll of 20 will always succeed:
If the d20 roll for an attack is a 20, the attack hits regardless of any modifiers or the target's AC. This is called a critical hit [...]
So, if a critical hit 'hits regardless of any modifiers or the target's AC' the fact that this is no longer a critical hit means it no longer 'hits regardless of any modifiers or the target's AC' and is now a viable target for cutting words.
Cutting words could not have been applied 'after the creature makes its roll, but before the DM determines whether the attack roll or ability check succeeds or fails' because as soon as a 20 was rolled it was classed as a critical hit and the DM did not need to determine whether it would succeed or fail - it was an automatic success.
However, once the Grave domain cleric has used their reaction to negate the critical hit there is a second opportunity to use Cutting Words 'before the creature deals its damage'. So, now the Lore Bard can use Cutting Words to try and cause the attack to miss.
I believe this is balanced as it has a (relatively) high opportunity cost.
The party will require both a Grave domain Cleric (level 6) and a Lore Bard (level 3) to have access to both of these features. Both abilities consume each player's reaction so a multiclass Cleric/Bard could not do this on their own. Sentinel at Death's Door can be used a limited number of times per long rest and Cutting Words spends one use of Bardic Inspiration die.
Cutting Words used this way also has a higher than average degree of failure. By which I mean that, statistically, the Bard will likely have to roll pretty high on their Bardic Inspiration die, in order to cancel a hit from a 20 on the dice, plus any modifiers the attacker adds, in order to bring the total below the AC of the attack's target.
A Bard who is playing the percentages might prefer to save their Bardic Inspiration to use when it is statistically most likely to cancel damage.
$endgroup$
Yes, these two features combined could potenially cause a critical hit to miss.
As quoted in your question, Sentinel at Death's Door, on it's own, turns a critical hit into a normal hit.
Cutting Words, crucially, can be used:
[...] after the creature makes its roll, but before the DM determines whether the attack roll or ability check succeeds or fails, or before the creature deals its damage. (emphasis mine)
Under normal circumstances an attack roll of 20 will always succeed:
If the d20 roll for an attack is a 20, the attack hits regardless of any modifiers or the target's AC. This is called a critical hit [...]
So, if a critical hit 'hits regardless of any modifiers or the target's AC' the fact that this is no longer a critical hit means it no longer 'hits regardless of any modifiers or the target's AC' and is now a viable target for cutting words.
Cutting words could not have been applied 'after the creature makes its roll, but before the DM determines whether the attack roll or ability check succeeds or fails' because as soon as a 20 was rolled it was classed as a critical hit and the DM did not need to determine whether it would succeed or fail - it was an automatic success.
However, once the Grave domain cleric has used their reaction to negate the critical hit there is a second opportunity to use Cutting Words 'before the creature deals its damage'. So, now the Lore Bard can use Cutting Words to try and cause the attack to miss.
I believe this is balanced as it has a (relatively) high opportunity cost.
The party will require both a Grave domain Cleric (level 6) and a Lore Bard (level 3) to have access to both of these features. Both abilities consume each player's reaction so a multiclass Cleric/Bard could not do this on their own. Sentinel at Death's Door can be used a limited number of times per long rest and Cutting Words spends one use of Bardic Inspiration die.
Cutting Words used this way also has a higher than average degree of failure. By which I mean that, statistically, the Bard will likely have to roll pretty high on their Bardic Inspiration die, in order to cancel a hit from a 20 on the dice, plus any modifiers the attacker adds, in order to bring the total below the AC of the attack's target.
A Bard who is playing the percentages might prefer to save their Bardic Inspiration to use when it is statistically most likely to cancel damage.
edited 9 hours ago
answered 10 hours ago
TiggerousTiggerous
10.1k44483
10.1k44483
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Role-playing Games Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f143034%2fcan-sentinel-at-deaths-door-and-cutting-words-combine-to-make-a-critical-hit-mi%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown