How is the UDP checksum verified at the receiver when you send FFFFh?
I'm talking about the special case when the one's complement of the sum results in 0 and we send its 1's complement FFFFh.What does the receiver add in order to make up for this change?
networking udp
add a comment |
I'm talking about the special case when the one's complement of the sum results in 0 and we send its 1's complement FFFFh.What does the receiver add in order to make up for this change?
networking udp
I'm not sure I understand the question, or maybe you don't understand that the receiver performs the exact same calculation as the sender, so the results would be the same. The receiver would come to the same conclusion that0x0000
would need to be changed to0xffff
.
– Ron Maupin
Nov 23 '18 at 4:51
Thanks! Wasn’t aware that the receiver works like that!
– Andrei Mari
Nov 23 '18 at 8:36
add a comment |
I'm talking about the special case when the one's complement of the sum results in 0 and we send its 1's complement FFFFh.What does the receiver add in order to make up for this change?
networking udp
I'm talking about the special case when the one's complement of the sum results in 0 and we send its 1's complement FFFFh.What does the receiver add in order to make up for this change?
networking udp
networking udp
asked Nov 22 '18 at 22:47
Andrei MariAndrei Mari
11
11
I'm not sure I understand the question, or maybe you don't understand that the receiver performs the exact same calculation as the sender, so the results would be the same. The receiver would come to the same conclusion that0x0000
would need to be changed to0xffff
.
– Ron Maupin
Nov 23 '18 at 4:51
Thanks! Wasn’t aware that the receiver works like that!
– Andrei Mari
Nov 23 '18 at 8:36
add a comment |
I'm not sure I understand the question, or maybe you don't understand that the receiver performs the exact same calculation as the sender, so the results would be the same. The receiver would come to the same conclusion that0x0000
would need to be changed to0xffff
.
– Ron Maupin
Nov 23 '18 at 4:51
Thanks! Wasn’t aware that the receiver works like that!
– Andrei Mari
Nov 23 '18 at 8:36
I'm not sure I understand the question, or maybe you don't understand that the receiver performs the exact same calculation as the sender, so the results would be the same. The receiver would come to the same conclusion that
0x0000
would need to be changed to 0xffff
.– Ron Maupin
Nov 23 '18 at 4:51
I'm not sure I understand the question, or maybe you don't understand that the receiver performs the exact same calculation as the sender, so the results would be the same. The receiver would come to the same conclusion that
0x0000
would need to be changed to 0xffff
.– Ron Maupin
Nov 23 '18 at 4:51
Thanks! Wasn’t aware that the receiver works like that!
– Andrei Mari
Nov 23 '18 at 8:36
Thanks! Wasn’t aware that the receiver works like that!
– Andrei Mari
Nov 23 '18 at 8:36
add a comment |
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53438779%2fhow-is-the-udp-checksum-verified-at-the-receiver-when-you-send-ffffh%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53438779%2fhow-is-the-udp-checksum-verified-at-the-receiver-when-you-send-ffffh%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
I'm not sure I understand the question, or maybe you don't understand that the receiver performs the exact same calculation as the sender, so the results would be the same. The receiver would come to the same conclusion that
0x0000
would need to be changed to0xffff
.– Ron Maupin
Nov 23 '18 at 4:51
Thanks! Wasn’t aware that the receiver works like that!
– Andrei Mari
Nov 23 '18 at 8:36