Has any country ever had 2 former presidents in jail simultaneously?












36















I suspect that today, this achievement has been granted for the first time to Brazil, with the arresting of Michel Temer, and considering that Lula da Silva is still under arrest.



It is normally big news if a former president is incarcerated, so I'd be surprised to know this occurred twice somewhere else.










share|improve this question




















  • 10





    and Rio de Janeiro State has 5 former governors in jail, house arrest, or who just recently got out of prison. (Garotinho hubby & wife, Moreira Franco, Sergio Cabral, Luiz Pezão).

    – Luiz
    Mar 21 at 19:40






  • 3





    I'm voting to close this question as off-topic because this question does not seem to be relevant to history (or to any other science).

    – Alex
    Mar 21 at 19:46






  • 5





    Illinois managed to do that with two former Governors.

    – LarsTech
    Mar 21 at 21:33






  • 2





    @LarsTech At least 2. At one point, I seem to recall that they had 4 out of 5 consecutive Governors go to prison after leaving (or being expelled from) office.

    – reirab
    Mar 21 at 22:14











  • @Alex It's literally a question about whether a thing has happened historically.

    – Lightness Races in Orbit
    Mar 24 at 18:54
















36















I suspect that today, this achievement has been granted for the first time to Brazil, with the arresting of Michel Temer, and considering that Lula da Silva is still under arrest.



It is normally big news if a former president is incarcerated, so I'd be surprised to know this occurred twice somewhere else.










share|improve this question




















  • 10





    and Rio de Janeiro State has 5 former governors in jail, house arrest, or who just recently got out of prison. (Garotinho hubby & wife, Moreira Franco, Sergio Cabral, Luiz Pezão).

    – Luiz
    Mar 21 at 19:40






  • 3





    I'm voting to close this question as off-topic because this question does not seem to be relevant to history (or to any other science).

    – Alex
    Mar 21 at 19:46






  • 5





    Illinois managed to do that with two former Governors.

    – LarsTech
    Mar 21 at 21:33






  • 2





    @LarsTech At least 2. At one point, I seem to recall that they had 4 out of 5 consecutive Governors go to prison after leaving (or being expelled from) office.

    – reirab
    Mar 21 at 22:14











  • @Alex It's literally a question about whether a thing has happened historically.

    – Lightness Races in Orbit
    Mar 24 at 18:54














36












36








36


2






I suspect that today, this achievement has been granted for the first time to Brazil, with the arresting of Michel Temer, and considering that Lula da Silva is still under arrest.



It is normally big news if a former president is incarcerated, so I'd be surprised to know this occurred twice somewhere else.










share|improve this question
















I suspect that today, this achievement has been granted for the first time to Brazil, with the arresting of Michel Temer, and considering that Lula da Silva is still under arrest.



It is normally big news if a former president is incarcerated, so I'd be surprised to know this occurred twice somewhere else.







contemporary-history president






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Mar 21 at 20:19







Mefitico

















asked Mar 21 at 19:01









MefiticoMefitico

28929




28929








  • 10





    and Rio de Janeiro State has 5 former governors in jail, house arrest, or who just recently got out of prison. (Garotinho hubby & wife, Moreira Franco, Sergio Cabral, Luiz Pezão).

    – Luiz
    Mar 21 at 19:40






  • 3





    I'm voting to close this question as off-topic because this question does not seem to be relevant to history (or to any other science).

    – Alex
    Mar 21 at 19:46






  • 5





    Illinois managed to do that with two former Governors.

    – LarsTech
    Mar 21 at 21:33






  • 2





    @LarsTech At least 2. At one point, I seem to recall that they had 4 out of 5 consecutive Governors go to prison after leaving (or being expelled from) office.

    – reirab
    Mar 21 at 22:14











  • @Alex It's literally a question about whether a thing has happened historically.

    – Lightness Races in Orbit
    Mar 24 at 18:54














  • 10





    and Rio de Janeiro State has 5 former governors in jail, house arrest, or who just recently got out of prison. (Garotinho hubby & wife, Moreira Franco, Sergio Cabral, Luiz Pezão).

    – Luiz
    Mar 21 at 19:40






  • 3





    I'm voting to close this question as off-topic because this question does not seem to be relevant to history (or to any other science).

    – Alex
    Mar 21 at 19:46






  • 5





    Illinois managed to do that with two former Governors.

    – LarsTech
    Mar 21 at 21:33






  • 2





    @LarsTech At least 2. At one point, I seem to recall that they had 4 out of 5 consecutive Governors go to prison after leaving (or being expelled from) office.

    – reirab
    Mar 21 at 22:14











  • @Alex It's literally a question about whether a thing has happened historically.

    – Lightness Races in Orbit
    Mar 24 at 18:54








10




10





and Rio de Janeiro State has 5 former governors in jail, house arrest, or who just recently got out of prison. (Garotinho hubby & wife, Moreira Franco, Sergio Cabral, Luiz Pezão).

– Luiz
Mar 21 at 19:40





and Rio de Janeiro State has 5 former governors in jail, house arrest, or who just recently got out of prison. (Garotinho hubby & wife, Moreira Franco, Sergio Cabral, Luiz Pezão).

– Luiz
Mar 21 at 19:40




3




3





I'm voting to close this question as off-topic because this question does not seem to be relevant to history (or to any other science).

– Alex
Mar 21 at 19:46





I'm voting to close this question as off-topic because this question does not seem to be relevant to history (or to any other science).

– Alex
Mar 21 at 19:46




5




5





Illinois managed to do that with two former Governors.

– LarsTech
Mar 21 at 21:33





Illinois managed to do that with two former Governors.

– LarsTech
Mar 21 at 21:33




2




2





@LarsTech At least 2. At one point, I seem to recall that they had 4 out of 5 consecutive Governors go to prison after leaving (or being expelled from) office.

– reirab
Mar 21 at 22:14





@LarsTech At least 2. At one point, I seem to recall that they had 4 out of 5 consecutive Governors go to prison after leaving (or being expelled from) office.

– reirab
Mar 21 at 22:14













@Alex It's literally a question about whether a thing has happened historically.

– Lightness Races in Orbit
Mar 24 at 18:54





@Alex It's literally a question about whether a thing has happened historically.

– Lightness Races in Orbit
Mar 24 at 18:54










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















51














Quite a few candidates if:



https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_heads_of_regimes_who_were_later_imprisoned



... [sort by country] is anything to go by...




  • Andalusia (technically an autonomous community in Spain) appears to have two former presidents sitting in jail since 2016.


  • Argentina has a whopping 8 presidents that sat in jail, including 2 from 2007 onward.


  • Bangladesh had 5 presidents who went to jail, of which two were behind bars in 1975.


  • Bosnia and Herzegovina had 2 presidents sitting in jail from 2006 to 2012.


  • Bulgaria had as many as 3 former prime ministers behind bars at the same time in 1944.


  • Comoros has 3 presidents and prime ministers behind bars at the time of writing this.


  • Costa Rica had 2 presidents behind bars from 2004 to 2012.



I'll stop at C, since the list is long, with a few honorable mentions:




  • Egypt appears to have had 5 former presidents in jail in 2013.


  • Guatemala 3 early in 2018


  • Hungary 4 in 1945


  • Iraq 4 in 2004


  • Japan 5 in 1945


  • Libya 4 in 2011


  • Pakistan 4 + 2 arrest warrants as I write this



The point is Brazil is not an exception.



One caveat: read the list with a fistful of salt, because it lists former French President Sarkozy as sitting behind bars since 2018, whereas he was only put in police custody for a day that year as he was charged with bribery and illegal campaign contributions. (He might sit in jail some day in the future, but the point here is that you may want to double check the data.) Also, Gaston Flosse of French Polynesia is listed twice.






share|improve this answer





















  • 33





    Take the list with lots of salt. Neither Arthur Más nor Carles Puigdemont have ever been imprisoned, and considering regional governments as "regimes" is to much of an stretch.

    – SJuan76
    Mar 21 at 21:40








  • 2





    The word "regime" has a lot of connotational baggage on it, but denotationally the word essentially just means "government." To the extent that use of the word "regime" is appropriate at all, it is quite reasonable to refer to regional governments as "regimes." Probably that Wikipedia article would be better off just changing the word "regime" to "government."

    – GrandOpener
    Mar 22 at 20:28






  • 1





    This list is clearly misleading. The case of Brazil is remarkable, because these are former presidents who are in prison, by the ordinary justice, and during a democratic period. Many in the list (all 8 from Argentina, for instance) are either former dictators or political prisoners.

    – Martin Argerami
    Mar 23 at 2:22











  • @SJuan76 Unless you were trying to make a joke, it is Artur Mas (or Charles Picodelmonte, if that was your intention). ;)

    – Rekesoft
    Mar 25 at 11:44



















33














Peru has an interesting case of former presidents being incarcerated or in the eye of justice.





  • Alberto Fujimori in right now in prison, for human right violations, 25 years of conviction.


  • Ollanta Humala is in preventive reclusion, investigated for corruption.


  • Alejandro Toledo, currently fugitive of justice for corruption as well. Case Oderbrecht (link in Spanish), that started in Brasil.


  • Alan García, twice president, twice investigated for corruption. Lately due to case Oderbrecht as well.


Summary, if you have been a Peruvian president, you are probably under investigation by the justice.






share|improve this answer





















  • 5





    The question asks about "jail", so "preventive reclusion" is quite close but not there. Then again, Peru might be a serious contender for the first triple.

    – Mefitico
    Mar 21 at 19:28






  • 2





    Alejandro Toledo spent a night in a California jail in March 2019, so that would count I guess. apnews.com/d60d5e33803c4c959f03e0e47e711ee6

    – ajd
    Mar 21 at 21:00






  • 8





    @Mefitico if you do not want to consider "preventive reclusion" then your reference to Brazil is a bit misleading since, from what I gather from the news, Temer is currently in preventive reclusion (so far he has not been condemned).

    – SJuan76
    Mar 21 at 21:21








  • 1





    @Mefitico afaik "preventive reclusion" is the equivalent of what in the US is called jail. A term that in many countries is synonymous with prison. You're hanging on linguistic differences here. He's in jail awaiting trial, rather than after being tried.

    – jwenting
    Mar 22 at 9:43






  • 2





    @jwenting: In Brazil "reclusion" normally refers to home arrest. We say something in the lines of "preventive imprisonment" when someone actually goes to jail before trial.

    – Mefitico
    Mar 22 at 11:55



















16














South Korea right now has their last two presidents, Lee Myung-bak and Park Geun-hye in jail.



Then again, almost all ex-presidents of South Korea end up either on trial or committing suicide...






share|improve this answer
























  • almost all ex-presidents of South Korea end up either on trial or committing suicide. is this true? I mean will this continue in future as well? If yes why?

    – newguy
    Mar 23 at 3:09











  • @newguy, past events do not imply that they must repeat themselves in the future, and nobody has a time machine.

    – Cœur
    Mar 24 at 16:03














Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "324"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fhistory.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f51723%2fhas-any-country-ever-had-2-former-presidents-in-jail-simultaneously%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes








3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









51














Quite a few candidates if:



https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_heads_of_regimes_who_were_later_imprisoned



... [sort by country] is anything to go by...




  • Andalusia (technically an autonomous community in Spain) appears to have two former presidents sitting in jail since 2016.


  • Argentina has a whopping 8 presidents that sat in jail, including 2 from 2007 onward.


  • Bangladesh had 5 presidents who went to jail, of which two were behind bars in 1975.


  • Bosnia and Herzegovina had 2 presidents sitting in jail from 2006 to 2012.


  • Bulgaria had as many as 3 former prime ministers behind bars at the same time in 1944.


  • Comoros has 3 presidents and prime ministers behind bars at the time of writing this.


  • Costa Rica had 2 presidents behind bars from 2004 to 2012.



I'll stop at C, since the list is long, with a few honorable mentions:




  • Egypt appears to have had 5 former presidents in jail in 2013.


  • Guatemala 3 early in 2018


  • Hungary 4 in 1945


  • Iraq 4 in 2004


  • Japan 5 in 1945


  • Libya 4 in 2011


  • Pakistan 4 + 2 arrest warrants as I write this



The point is Brazil is not an exception.



One caveat: read the list with a fistful of salt, because it lists former French President Sarkozy as sitting behind bars since 2018, whereas he was only put in police custody for a day that year as he was charged with bribery and illegal campaign contributions. (He might sit in jail some day in the future, but the point here is that you may want to double check the data.) Also, Gaston Flosse of French Polynesia is listed twice.






share|improve this answer





















  • 33





    Take the list with lots of salt. Neither Arthur Más nor Carles Puigdemont have ever been imprisoned, and considering regional governments as "regimes" is to much of an stretch.

    – SJuan76
    Mar 21 at 21:40








  • 2





    The word "regime" has a lot of connotational baggage on it, but denotationally the word essentially just means "government." To the extent that use of the word "regime" is appropriate at all, it is quite reasonable to refer to regional governments as "regimes." Probably that Wikipedia article would be better off just changing the word "regime" to "government."

    – GrandOpener
    Mar 22 at 20:28






  • 1





    This list is clearly misleading. The case of Brazil is remarkable, because these are former presidents who are in prison, by the ordinary justice, and during a democratic period. Many in the list (all 8 from Argentina, for instance) are either former dictators or political prisoners.

    – Martin Argerami
    Mar 23 at 2:22











  • @SJuan76 Unless you were trying to make a joke, it is Artur Mas (or Charles Picodelmonte, if that was your intention). ;)

    – Rekesoft
    Mar 25 at 11:44
















51














Quite a few candidates if:



https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_heads_of_regimes_who_were_later_imprisoned



... [sort by country] is anything to go by...




  • Andalusia (technically an autonomous community in Spain) appears to have two former presidents sitting in jail since 2016.


  • Argentina has a whopping 8 presidents that sat in jail, including 2 from 2007 onward.


  • Bangladesh had 5 presidents who went to jail, of which two were behind bars in 1975.


  • Bosnia and Herzegovina had 2 presidents sitting in jail from 2006 to 2012.


  • Bulgaria had as many as 3 former prime ministers behind bars at the same time in 1944.


  • Comoros has 3 presidents and prime ministers behind bars at the time of writing this.


  • Costa Rica had 2 presidents behind bars from 2004 to 2012.



I'll stop at C, since the list is long, with a few honorable mentions:




  • Egypt appears to have had 5 former presidents in jail in 2013.


  • Guatemala 3 early in 2018


  • Hungary 4 in 1945


  • Iraq 4 in 2004


  • Japan 5 in 1945


  • Libya 4 in 2011


  • Pakistan 4 + 2 arrest warrants as I write this



The point is Brazil is not an exception.



One caveat: read the list with a fistful of salt, because it lists former French President Sarkozy as sitting behind bars since 2018, whereas he was only put in police custody for a day that year as he was charged with bribery and illegal campaign contributions. (He might sit in jail some day in the future, but the point here is that you may want to double check the data.) Also, Gaston Flosse of French Polynesia is listed twice.






share|improve this answer





















  • 33





    Take the list with lots of salt. Neither Arthur Más nor Carles Puigdemont have ever been imprisoned, and considering regional governments as "regimes" is to much of an stretch.

    – SJuan76
    Mar 21 at 21:40








  • 2





    The word "regime" has a lot of connotational baggage on it, but denotationally the word essentially just means "government." To the extent that use of the word "regime" is appropriate at all, it is quite reasonable to refer to regional governments as "regimes." Probably that Wikipedia article would be better off just changing the word "regime" to "government."

    – GrandOpener
    Mar 22 at 20:28






  • 1





    This list is clearly misleading. The case of Brazil is remarkable, because these are former presidents who are in prison, by the ordinary justice, and during a democratic period. Many in the list (all 8 from Argentina, for instance) are either former dictators or political prisoners.

    – Martin Argerami
    Mar 23 at 2:22











  • @SJuan76 Unless you were trying to make a joke, it is Artur Mas (or Charles Picodelmonte, if that was your intention). ;)

    – Rekesoft
    Mar 25 at 11:44














51












51








51







Quite a few candidates if:



https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_heads_of_regimes_who_were_later_imprisoned



... [sort by country] is anything to go by...




  • Andalusia (technically an autonomous community in Spain) appears to have two former presidents sitting in jail since 2016.


  • Argentina has a whopping 8 presidents that sat in jail, including 2 from 2007 onward.


  • Bangladesh had 5 presidents who went to jail, of which two were behind bars in 1975.


  • Bosnia and Herzegovina had 2 presidents sitting in jail from 2006 to 2012.


  • Bulgaria had as many as 3 former prime ministers behind bars at the same time in 1944.


  • Comoros has 3 presidents and prime ministers behind bars at the time of writing this.


  • Costa Rica had 2 presidents behind bars from 2004 to 2012.



I'll stop at C, since the list is long, with a few honorable mentions:




  • Egypt appears to have had 5 former presidents in jail in 2013.


  • Guatemala 3 early in 2018


  • Hungary 4 in 1945


  • Iraq 4 in 2004


  • Japan 5 in 1945


  • Libya 4 in 2011


  • Pakistan 4 + 2 arrest warrants as I write this



The point is Brazil is not an exception.



One caveat: read the list with a fistful of salt, because it lists former French President Sarkozy as sitting behind bars since 2018, whereas he was only put in police custody for a day that year as he was charged with bribery and illegal campaign contributions. (He might sit in jail some day in the future, but the point here is that you may want to double check the data.) Also, Gaston Flosse of French Polynesia is listed twice.






share|improve this answer















Quite a few candidates if:



https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_heads_of_regimes_who_were_later_imprisoned



... [sort by country] is anything to go by...




  • Andalusia (technically an autonomous community in Spain) appears to have two former presidents sitting in jail since 2016.


  • Argentina has a whopping 8 presidents that sat in jail, including 2 from 2007 onward.


  • Bangladesh had 5 presidents who went to jail, of which two were behind bars in 1975.


  • Bosnia and Herzegovina had 2 presidents sitting in jail from 2006 to 2012.


  • Bulgaria had as many as 3 former prime ministers behind bars at the same time in 1944.


  • Comoros has 3 presidents and prime ministers behind bars at the time of writing this.


  • Costa Rica had 2 presidents behind bars from 2004 to 2012.



I'll stop at C, since the list is long, with a few honorable mentions:




  • Egypt appears to have had 5 former presidents in jail in 2013.


  • Guatemala 3 early in 2018


  • Hungary 4 in 1945


  • Iraq 4 in 2004


  • Japan 5 in 1945


  • Libya 4 in 2011


  • Pakistan 4 + 2 arrest warrants as I write this



The point is Brazil is not an exception.



One caveat: read the list with a fistful of salt, because it lists former French President Sarkozy as sitting behind bars since 2018, whereas he was only put in police custody for a day that year as he was charged with bribery and illegal campaign contributions. (He might sit in jail some day in the future, but the point here is that you may want to double check the data.) Also, Gaston Flosse of French Polynesia is listed twice.







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited Mar 21 at 21:27

























answered Mar 21 at 21:14









Denis de BernardyDenis de Bernardy

13k24052




13k24052








  • 33





    Take the list with lots of salt. Neither Arthur Más nor Carles Puigdemont have ever been imprisoned, and considering regional governments as "regimes" is to much of an stretch.

    – SJuan76
    Mar 21 at 21:40








  • 2





    The word "regime" has a lot of connotational baggage on it, but denotationally the word essentially just means "government." To the extent that use of the word "regime" is appropriate at all, it is quite reasonable to refer to regional governments as "regimes." Probably that Wikipedia article would be better off just changing the word "regime" to "government."

    – GrandOpener
    Mar 22 at 20:28






  • 1





    This list is clearly misleading. The case of Brazil is remarkable, because these are former presidents who are in prison, by the ordinary justice, and during a democratic period. Many in the list (all 8 from Argentina, for instance) are either former dictators or political prisoners.

    – Martin Argerami
    Mar 23 at 2:22











  • @SJuan76 Unless you were trying to make a joke, it is Artur Mas (or Charles Picodelmonte, if that was your intention). ;)

    – Rekesoft
    Mar 25 at 11:44














  • 33





    Take the list with lots of salt. Neither Arthur Más nor Carles Puigdemont have ever been imprisoned, and considering regional governments as "regimes" is to much of an stretch.

    – SJuan76
    Mar 21 at 21:40








  • 2





    The word "regime" has a lot of connotational baggage on it, but denotationally the word essentially just means "government." To the extent that use of the word "regime" is appropriate at all, it is quite reasonable to refer to regional governments as "regimes." Probably that Wikipedia article would be better off just changing the word "regime" to "government."

    – GrandOpener
    Mar 22 at 20:28






  • 1





    This list is clearly misleading. The case of Brazil is remarkable, because these are former presidents who are in prison, by the ordinary justice, and during a democratic period. Many in the list (all 8 from Argentina, for instance) are either former dictators or political prisoners.

    – Martin Argerami
    Mar 23 at 2:22











  • @SJuan76 Unless you were trying to make a joke, it is Artur Mas (or Charles Picodelmonte, if that was your intention). ;)

    – Rekesoft
    Mar 25 at 11:44








33




33





Take the list with lots of salt. Neither Arthur Más nor Carles Puigdemont have ever been imprisoned, and considering regional governments as "regimes" is to much of an stretch.

– SJuan76
Mar 21 at 21:40







Take the list with lots of salt. Neither Arthur Más nor Carles Puigdemont have ever been imprisoned, and considering regional governments as "regimes" is to much of an stretch.

– SJuan76
Mar 21 at 21:40






2




2





The word "regime" has a lot of connotational baggage on it, but denotationally the word essentially just means "government." To the extent that use of the word "regime" is appropriate at all, it is quite reasonable to refer to regional governments as "regimes." Probably that Wikipedia article would be better off just changing the word "regime" to "government."

– GrandOpener
Mar 22 at 20:28





The word "regime" has a lot of connotational baggage on it, but denotationally the word essentially just means "government." To the extent that use of the word "regime" is appropriate at all, it is quite reasonable to refer to regional governments as "regimes." Probably that Wikipedia article would be better off just changing the word "regime" to "government."

– GrandOpener
Mar 22 at 20:28




1




1





This list is clearly misleading. The case of Brazil is remarkable, because these are former presidents who are in prison, by the ordinary justice, and during a democratic period. Many in the list (all 8 from Argentina, for instance) are either former dictators or political prisoners.

– Martin Argerami
Mar 23 at 2:22





This list is clearly misleading. The case of Brazil is remarkable, because these are former presidents who are in prison, by the ordinary justice, and during a democratic period. Many in the list (all 8 from Argentina, for instance) are either former dictators or political prisoners.

– Martin Argerami
Mar 23 at 2:22













@SJuan76 Unless you were trying to make a joke, it is Artur Mas (or Charles Picodelmonte, if that was your intention). ;)

– Rekesoft
Mar 25 at 11:44





@SJuan76 Unless you were trying to make a joke, it is Artur Mas (or Charles Picodelmonte, if that was your intention). ;)

– Rekesoft
Mar 25 at 11:44











33














Peru has an interesting case of former presidents being incarcerated or in the eye of justice.





  • Alberto Fujimori in right now in prison, for human right violations, 25 years of conviction.


  • Ollanta Humala is in preventive reclusion, investigated for corruption.


  • Alejandro Toledo, currently fugitive of justice for corruption as well. Case Oderbrecht (link in Spanish), that started in Brasil.


  • Alan García, twice president, twice investigated for corruption. Lately due to case Oderbrecht as well.


Summary, if you have been a Peruvian president, you are probably under investigation by the justice.






share|improve this answer





















  • 5





    The question asks about "jail", so "preventive reclusion" is quite close but not there. Then again, Peru might be a serious contender for the first triple.

    – Mefitico
    Mar 21 at 19:28






  • 2





    Alejandro Toledo spent a night in a California jail in March 2019, so that would count I guess. apnews.com/d60d5e33803c4c959f03e0e47e711ee6

    – ajd
    Mar 21 at 21:00






  • 8





    @Mefitico if you do not want to consider "preventive reclusion" then your reference to Brazil is a bit misleading since, from what I gather from the news, Temer is currently in preventive reclusion (so far he has not been condemned).

    – SJuan76
    Mar 21 at 21:21








  • 1





    @Mefitico afaik "preventive reclusion" is the equivalent of what in the US is called jail. A term that in many countries is synonymous with prison. You're hanging on linguistic differences here. He's in jail awaiting trial, rather than after being tried.

    – jwenting
    Mar 22 at 9:43






  • 2





    @jwenting: In Brazil "reclusion" normally refers to home arrest. We say something in the lines of "preventive imprisonment" when someone actually goes to jail before trial.

    – Mefitico
    Mar 22 at 11:55
















33














Peru has an interesting case of former presidents being incarcerated or in the eye of justice.





  • Alberto Fujimori in right now in prison, for human right violations, 25 years of conviction.


  • Ollanta Humala is in preventive reclusion, investigated for corruption.


  • Alejandro Toledo, currently fugitive of justice for corruption as well. Case Oderbrecht (link in Spanish), that started in Brasil.


  • Alan García, twice president, twice investigated for corruption. Lately due to case Oderbrecht as well.


Summary, if you have been a Peruvian president, you are probably under investigation by the justice.






share|improve this answer





















  • 5





    The question asks about "jail", so "preventive reclusion" is quite close but not there. Then again, Peru might be a serious contender for the first triple.

    – Mefitico
    Mar 21 at 19:28






  • 2





    Alejandro Toledo spent a night in a California jail in March 2019, so that would count I guess. apnews.com/d60d5e33803c4c959f03e0e47e711ee6

    – ajd
    Mar 21 at 21:00






  • 8





    @Mefitico if you do not want to consider "preventive reclusion" then your reference to Brazil is a bit misleading since, from what I gather from the news, Temer is currently in preventive reclusion (so far he has not been condemned).

    – SJuan76
    Mar 21 at 21:21








  • 1





    @Mefitico afaik "preventive reclusion" is the equivalent of what in the US is called jail. A term that in many countries is synonymous with prison. You're hanging on linguistic differences here. He's in jail awaiting trial, rather than after being tried.

    – jwenting
    Mar 22 at 9:43






  • 2





    @jwenting: In Brazil "reclusion" normally refers to home arrest. We say something in the lines of "preventive imprisonment" when someone actually goes to jail before trial.

    – Mefitico
    Mar 22 at 11:55














33












33








33







Peru has an interesting case of former presidents being incarcerated or in the eye of justice.





  • Alberto Fujimori in right now in prison, for human right violations, 25 years of conviction.


  • Ollanta Humala is in preventive reclusion, investigated for corruption.


  • Alejandro Toledo, currently fugitive of justice for corruption as well. Case Oderbrecht (link in Spanish), that started in Brasil.


  • Alan García, twice president, twice investigated for corruption. Lately due to case Oderbrecht as well.


Summary, if you have been a Peruvian president, you are probably under investigation by the justice.






share|improve this answer















Peru has an interesting case of former presidents being incarcerated or in the eye of justice.





  • Alberto Fujimori in right now in prison, for human right violations, 25 years of conviction.


  • Ollanta Humala is in preventive reclusion, investigated for corruption.


  • Alejandro Toledo, currently fugitive of justice for corruption as well. Case Oderbrecht (link in Spanish), that started in Brasil.


  • Alan García, twice president, twice investigated for corruption. Lately due to case Oderbrecht as well.


Summary, if you have been a Peruvian president, you are probably under investigation by the justice.







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited Mar 21 at 19:51









Mark C. Wallace

23.8k973112




23.8k973112










answered Mar 21 at 19:20









SantiagoSantiago

3,104920




3,104920








  • 5





    The question asks about "jail", so "preventive reclusion" is quite close but not there. Then again, Peru might be a serious contender for the first triple.

    – Mefitico
    Mar 21 at 19:28






  • 2





    Alejandro Toledo spent a night in a California jail in March 2019, so that would count I guess. apnews.com/d60d5e33803c4c959f03e0e47e711ee6

    – ajd
    Mar 21 at 21:00






  • 8





    @Mefitico if you do not want to consider "preventive reclusion" then your reference to Brazil is a bit misleading since, from what I gather from the news, Temer is currently in preventive reclusion (so far he has not been condemned).

    – SJuan76
    Mar 21 at 21:21








  • 1





    @Mefitico afaik "preventive reclusion" is the equivalent of what in the US is called jail. A term that in many countries is synonymous with prison. You're hanging on linguistic differences here. He's in jail awaiting trial, rather than after being tried.

    – jwenting
    Mar 22 at 9:43






  • 2





    @jwenting: In Brazil "reclusion" normally refers to home arrest. We say something in the lines of "preventive imprisonment" when someone actually goes to jail before trial.

    – Mefitico
    Mar 22 at 11:55














  • 5





    The question asks about "jail", so "preventive reclusion" is quite close but not there. Then again, Peru might be a serious contender for the first triple.

    – Mefitico
    Mar 21 at 19:28






  • 2





    Alejandro Toledo spent a night in a California jail in March 2019, so that would count I guess. apnews.com/d60d5e33803c4c959f03e0e47e711ee6

    – ajd
    Mar 21 at 21:00






  • 8





    @Mefitico if you do not want to consider "preventive reclusion" then your reference to Brazil is a bit misleading since, from what I gather from the news, Temer is currently in preventive reclusion (so far he has not been condemned).

    – SJuan76
    Mar 21 at 21:21








  • 1





    @Mefitico afaik "preventive reclusion" is the equivalent of what in the US is called jail. A term that in many countries is synonymous with prison. You're hanging on linguistic differences here. He's in jail awaiting trial, rather than after being tried.

    – jwenting
    Mar 22 at 9:43






  • 2





    @jwenting: In Brazil "reclusion" normally refers to home arrest. We say something in the lines of "preventive imprisonment" when someone actually goes to jail before trial.

    – Mefitico
    Mar 22 at 11:55








5




5





The question asks about "jail", so "preventive reclusion" is quite close but not there. Then again, Peru might be a serious contender for the first triple.

– Mefitico
Mar 21 at 19:28





The question asks about "jail", so "preventive reclusion" is quite close but not there. Then again, Peru might be a serious contender for the first triple.

– Mefitico
Mar 21 at 19:28




2




2





Alejandro Toledo spent a night in a California jail in March 2019, so that would count I guess. apnews.com/d60d5e33803c4c959f03e0e47e711ee6

– ajd
Mar 21 at 21:00





Alejandro Toledo spent a night in a California jail in March 2019, so that would count I guess. apnews.com/d60d5e33803c4c959f03e0e47e711ee6

– ajd
Mar 21 at 21:00




8




8





@Mefitico if you do not want to consider "preventive reclusion" then your reference to Brazil is a bit misleading since, from what I gather from the news, Temer is currently in preventive reclusion (so far he has not been condemned).

– SJuan76
Mar 21 at 21:21







@Mefitico if you do not want to consider "preventive reclusion" then your reference to Brazil is a bit misleading since, from what I gather from the news, Temer is currently in preventive reclusion (so far he has not been condemned).

– SJuan76
Mar 21 at 21:21






1




1





@Mefitico afaik "preventive reclusion" is the equivalent of what in the US is called jail. A term that in many countries is synonymous with prison. You're hanging on linguistic differences here. He's in jail awaiting trial, rather than after being tried.

– jwenting
Mar 22 at 9:43





@Mefitico afaik "preventive reclusion" is the equivalent of what in the US is called jail. A term that in many countries is synonymous with prison. You're hanging on linguistic differences here. He's in jail awaiting trial, rather than after being tried.

– jwenting
Mar 22 at 9:43




2




2





@jwenting: In Brazil "reclusion" normally refers to home arrest. We say something in the lines of "preventive imprisonment" when someone actually goes to jail before trial.

– Mefitico
Mar 22 at 11:55





@jwenting: In Brazil "reclusion" normally refers to home arrest. We say something in the lines of "preventive imprisonment" when someone actually goes to jail before trial.

– Mefitico
Mar 22 at 11:55











16














South Korea right now has their last two presidents, Lee Myung-bak and Park Geun-hye in jail.



Then again, almost all ex-presidents of South Korea end up either on trial or committing suicide...






share|improve this answer
























  • almost all ex-presidents of South Korea end up either on trial or committing suicide. is this true? I mean will this continue in future as well? If yes why?

    – newguy
    Mar 23 at 3:09











  • @newguy, past events do not imply that they must repeat themselves in the future, and nobody has a time machine.

    – Cœur
    Mar 24 at 16:03


















16














South Korea right now has their last two presidents, Lee Myung-bak and Park Geun-hye in jail.



Then again, almost all ex-presidents of South Korea end up either on trial or committing suicide...






share|improve this answer
























  • almost all ex-presidents of South Korea end up either on trial or committing suicide. is this true? I mean will this continue in future as well? If yes why?

    – newguy
    Mar 23 at 3:09











  • @newguy, past events do not imply that they must repeat themselves in the future, and nobody has a time machine.

    – Cœur
    Mar 24 at 16:03
















16












16








16







South Korea right now has their last two presidents, Lee Myung-bak and Park Geun-hye in jail.



Then again, almost all ex-presidents of South Korea end up either on trial or committing suicide...






share|improve this answer













South Korea right now has their last two presidents, Lee Myung-bak and Park Geun-hye in jail.



Then again, almost all ex-presidents of South Korea end up either on trial or committing suicide...







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered Mar 21 at 23:52









Ken Y-NKen Y-N

26113




26113













  • almost all ex-presidents of South Korea end up either on trial or committing suicide. is this true? I mean will this continue in future as well? If yes why?

    – newguy
    Mar 23 at 3:09











  • @newguy, past events do not imply that they must repeat themselves in the future, and nobody has a time machine.

    – Cœur
    Mar 24 at 16:03





















  • almost all ex-presidents of South Korea end up either on trial or committing suicide. is this true? I mean will this continue in future as well? If yes why?

    – newguy
    Mar 23 at 3:09











  • @newguy, past events do not imply that they must repeat themselves in the future, and nobody has a time machine.

    – Cœur
    Mar 24 at 16:03



















almost all ex-presidents of South Korea end up either on trial or committing suicide. is this true? I mean will this continue in future as well? If yes why?

– newguy
Mar 23 at 3:09





almost all ex-presidents of South Korea end up either on trial or committing suicide. is this true? I mean will this continue in future as well? If yes why?

– newguy
Mar 23 at 3:09













@newguy, past events do not imply that they must repeat themselves in the future, and nobody has a time machine.

– Cœur
Mar 24 at 16:03







@newguy, past events do not imply that they must repeat themselves in the future, and nobody has a time machine.

– Cœur
Mar 24 at 16:03




















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to History Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fhistory.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f51723%2fhas-any-country-ever-had-2-former-presidents-in-jail-simultaneously%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

"Incorrect syntax near the keyword 'ON'. (on update cascade, on delete cascade,)

Alcedinidae

Origin of the phrase “under your belt”?