JIS and ISO square taper
I've read Sheldon Brown's page on JIS and ISO and have read exchanges in forums about the pros and cons of using ISO cranks on JIS bottom brackets.
If my understanding is correct, these standards define the shape and dimensions of the BB spindle and thus have implications for the cut made in the crank that must fit on the spindle.
The reason for my question is that a vendor of ISO cranksets is telling me that their cranksets will work on an ISO or JIS bottom bracket if the bike is a folding bike. Does whether the bike folds have anything at all to do with this compatibility between BB and crank?
crankset bottom-bracket folding-bicycle
add a comment |
I've read Sheldon Brown's page on JIS and ISO and have read exchanges in forums about the pros and cons of using ISO cranks on JIS bottom brackets.
If my understanding is correct, these standards define the shape and dimensions of the BB spindle and thus have implications for the cut made in the crank that must fit on the spindle.
The reason for my question is that a vendor of ISO cranksets is telling me that their cranksets will work on an ISO or JIS bottom bracket if the bike is a folding bike. Does whether the bike folds have anything at all to do with this compatibility between BB and crank?
crankset bottom-bracket folding-bicycle
1
It does not make any sense at all. What is this vendor?
– ojs
Mar 21 at 15:53
@ojs: It's not the manufacturer but an online seller, so I'd rather not give any particulars, but it's not one that is well-known.
– Tᴚoɯɐuo
Mar 21 at 17:58
3
I don't see any particular reason why they should be protected from their own incompetence.
– ojs
Mar 21 at 18:35
I'd prefer to inoculate the ignorant (like myself) against their incompetence.
– Tᴚoɯɐuo
Mar 21 at 20:31
add a comment |
I've read Sheldon Brown's page on JIS and ISO and have read exchanges in forums about the pros and cons of using ISO cranks on JIS bottom brackets.
If my understanding is correct, these standards define the shape and dimensions of the BB spindle and thus have implications for the cut made in the crank that must fit on the spindle.
The reason for my question is that a vendor of ISO cranksets is telling me that their cranksets will work on an ISO or JIS bottom bracket if the bike is a folding bike. Does whether the bike folds have anything at all to do with this compatibility between BB and crank?
crankset bottom-bracket folding-bicycle
I've read Sheldon Brown's page on JIS and ISO and have read exchanges in forums about the pros and cons of using ISO cranks on JIS bottom brackets.
If my understanding is correct, these standards define the shape and dimensions of the BB spindle and thus have implications for the cut made in the crank that must fit on the spindle.
The reason for my question is that a vendor of ISO cranksets is telling me that their cranksets will work on an ISO or JIS bottom bracket if the bike is a folding bike. Does whether the bike folds have anything at all to do with this compatibility between BB and crank?
crankset bottom-bracket folding-bicycle
crankset bottom-bracket folding-bicycle
asked Mar 21 at 15:05
TᴚoɯɐuoTᴚoɯɐuo
1845
1845
1
It does not make any sense at all. What is this vendor?
– ojs
Mar 21 at 15:53
@ojs: It's not the manufacturer but an online seller, so I'd rather not give any particulars, but it's not one that is well-known.
– Tᴚoɯɐuo
Mar 21 at 17:58
3
I don't see any particular reason why they should be protected from their own incompetence.
– ojs
Mar 21 at 18:35
I'd prefer to inoculate the ignorant (like myself) against their incompetence.
– Tᴚoɯɐuo
Mar 21 at 20:31
add a comment |
1
It does not make any sense at all. What is this vendor?
– ojs
Mar 21 at 15:53
@ojs: It's not the manufacturer but an online seller, so I'd rather not give any particulars, but it's not one that is well-known.
– Tᴚoɯɐuo
Mar 21 at 17:58
3
I don't see any particular reason why they should be protected from their own incompetence.
– ojs
Mar 21 at 18:35
I'd prefer to inoculate the ignorant (like myself) against their incompetence.
– Tᴚoɯɐuo
Mar 21 at 20:31
1
1
It does not make any sense at all. What is this vendor?
– ojs
Mar 21 at 15:53
It does not make any sense at all. What is this vendor?
– ojs
Mar 21 at 15:53
@ojs: It's not the manufacturer but an online seller, so I'd rather not give any particulars, but it's not one that is well-known.
– Tᴚoɯɐuo
Mar 21 at 17:58
@ojs: It's not the manufacturer but an online seller, so I'd rather not give any particulars, but it's not one that is well-known.
– Tᴚoɯɐuo
Mar 21 at 17:58
3
3
I don't see any particular reason why they should be protected from their own incompetence.
– ojs
Mar 21 at 18:35
I don't see any particular reason why they should be protected from their own incompetence.
– ojs
Mar 21 at 18:35
I'd prefer to inoculate the ignorant (like myself) against their incompetence.
– Tᴚoɯɐuo
Mar 21 at 20:31
I'd prefer to inoculate the ignorant (like myself) against their incompetence.
– Tᴚoɯɐuo
Mar 21 at 20:31
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
Does whether the bike folds have anything at all to do with this compatibility between BB and crank?
Executive summary:
NO!
Longer answer:
Here's the Sheldon Brown link: https://www.sheldonbrown.com/bbtaper.html
Even though both ISO and JIS have the same taper angle, ISO spindles are narrower than JIS spindles, so an ISO crank won't go all the way onto a JIS spindle.
Depending on the specifics of the crankset and spindle, how far the cranks go onto the spindle may or may not be sufficient to both be safe and able to withstand usage for a good amount of time.
But I wouldn't do it for any bike I might ride - I view the situation you've described as a somewhat unethical attempt to make a sale. It might work, but saying it will just because the bike folds is, well, sleazy.
Because whether or not the bike folds doesn't matter. The specifics of the bottom bracket spindle and the crank itself matter. And a crank where the design prevents full engagement of the load-bearing surface with a close-but-not-quite-right bottom bracket spindle isn't a configuration I'd be able to recommend with a clean conscience.
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "126"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fbicycles.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f59880%2fjis-and-iso-square-taper%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Does whether the bike folds have anything at all to do with this compatibility between BB and crank?
Executive summary:
NO!
Longer answer:
Here's the Sheldon Brown link: https://www.sheldonbrown.com/bbtaper.html
Even though both ISO and JIS have the same taper angle, ISO spindles are narrower than JIS spindles, so an ISO crank won't go all the way onto a JIS spindle.
Depending on the specifics of the crankset and spindle, how far the cranks go onto the spindle may or may not be sufficient to both be safe and able to withstand usage for a good amount of time.
But I wouldn't do it for any bike I might ride - I view the situation you've described as a somewhat unethical attempt to make a sale. It might work, but saying it will just because the bike folds is, well, sleazy.
Because whether or not the bike folds doesn't matter. The specifics of the bottom bracket spindle and the crank itself matter. And a crank where the design prevents full engagement of the load-bearing surface with a close-but-not-quite-right bottom bracket spindle isn't a configuration I'd be able to recommend with a clean conscience.
add a comment |
Does whether the bike folds have anything at all to do with this compatibility between BB and crank?
Executive summary:
NO!
Longer answer:
Here's the Sheldon Brown link: https://www.sheldonbrown.com/bbtaper.html
Even though both ISO and JIS have the same taper angle, ISO spindles are narrower than JIS spindles, so an ISO crank won't go all the way onto a JIS spindle.
Depending on the specifics of the crankset and spindle, how far the cranks go onto the spindle may or may not be sufficient to both be safe and able to withstand usage for a good amount of time.
But I wouldn't do it for any bike I might ride - I view the situation you've described as a somewhat unethical attempt to make a sale. It might work, but saying it will just because the bike folds is, well, sleazy.
Because whether or not the bike folds doesn't matter. The specifics of the bottom bracket spindle and the crank itself matter. And a crank where the design prevents full engagement of the load-bearing surface with a close-but-not-quite-right bottom bracket spindle isn't a configuration I'd be able to recommend with a clean conscience.
add a comment |
Does whether the bike folds have anything at all to do with this compatibility between BB and crank?
Executive summary:
NO!
Longer answer:
Here's the Sheldon Brown link: https://www.sheldonbrown.com/bbtaper.html
Even though both ISO and JIS have the same taper angle, ISO spindles are narrower than JIS spindles, so an ISO crank won't go all the way onto a JIS spindle.
Depending on the specifics of the crankset and spindle, how far the cranks go onto the spindle may or may not be sufficient to both be safe and able to withstand usage for a good amount of time.
But I wouldn't do it for any bike I might ride - I view the situation you've described as a somewhat unethical attempt to make a sale. It might work, but saying it will just because the bike folds is, well, sleazy.
Because whether or not the bike folds doesn't matter. The specifics of the bottom bracket spindle and the crank itself matter. And a crank where the design prevents full engagement of the load-bearing surface with a close-but-not-quite-right bottom bracket spindle isn't a configuration I'd be able to recommend with a clean conscience.
Does whether the bike folds have anything at all to do with this compatibility between BB and crank?
Executive summary:
NO!
Longer answer:
Here's the Sheldon Brown link: https://www.sheldonbrown.com/bbtaper.html
Even though both ISO and JIS have the same taper angle, ISO spindles are narrower than JIS spindles, so an ISO crank won't go all the way onto a JIS spindle.
Depending on the specifics of the crankset and spindle, how far the cranks go onto the spindle may or may not be sufficient to both be safe and able to withstand usage for a good amount of time.
But I wouldn't do it for any bike I might ride - I view the situation you've described as a somewhat unethical attempt to make a sale. It might work, but saying it will just because the bike folds is, well, sleazy.
Because whether or not the bike folds doesn't matter. The specifics of the bottom bracket spindle and the crank itself matter. And a crank where the design prevents full engagement of the load-bearing surface with a close-but-not-quite-right bottom bracket spindle isn't a configuration I'd be able to recommend with a clean conscience.
answered Mar 21 at 16:12
Andrew HenleAndrew Henle
2,618814
2,618814
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Bicycles Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fbicycles.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f59880%2fjis-and-iso-square-taper%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
It does not make any sense at all. What is this vendor?
– ojs
Mar 21 at 15:53
@ojs: It's not the manufacturer but an online seller, so I'd rather not give any particulars, but it's not one that is well-known.
– Tᴚoɯɐuo
Mar 21 at 17:58
3
I don't see any particular reason why they should be protected from their own incompetence.
– ojs
Mar 21 at 18:35
I'd prefer to inoculate the ignorant (like myself) against their incompetence.
– Tᴚoɯɐuo
Mar 21 at 20:31