Is it possible to use “HOW + Clause” like those below





.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty{ margin-bottom:0;
}






up vote
0
down vote

favorite












Could you please help me to fix and explain to me, which sentence is correct?



1."They protect themselves from their sympathy is enlisted"



2."They protect themselves from their sympathy to be enlisted"



3."They protect themselves from their sympathy being enlisted"



(I guess the correct sentence should be:
"*They protect themselves from the fact that their sympathy is enlisted*"
or "They protect themselves from their sympathy that is enlisted? or "They should protect their sympathy from being enlisted.")



But i want to know if it is possible to use "HOW + Clause" or somehow like those?






grammar grammatical-structure







share|improve this question







New contributor




Vũ Bảo is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.




















  • This is proofreading, and so will be closed (it's not allowed here). But none of these work very well.
    – Peter Shor
    2 days ago












  • Your sentence is rather strange. Are you trying to say that one group of people wants to avoid being asked to sympathise with another group? If so, (3) is the only one that works (and could possibly have 'how' in front of it).
    – Kate Bunting
    2 days ago










  • There is a simple answer. “They protect themselves from HAVING their sympathy enlisted.
    – Tuffy
    2 days ago










  • Thanks you very much! “They protect themselves from HAVING their sympathy enlisted" sounds perfect!. But could you explain more, "having THEIR SYMPATHY ENLISTED", is that a Simplified relative clauses?
    – Vũ Bảo
    2 days ago












  • Which means " having their sympathy that is enlisted'.?
    – Vũ Bảo
    2 days ago

















up vote
0
down vote

favorite












Could you please help me to fix and explain to me, which sentence is correct?



1."They protect themselves from their sympathy is enlisted"



2."They protect themselves from their sympathy to be enlisted"



3."They protect themselves from their sympathy being enlisted"



(I guess the correct sentence should be:
"*They protect themselves from the fact that their sympathy is enlisted*"
or "They protect themselves from their sympathy that is enlisted? or "They should protect their sympathy from being enlisted.")



But i want to know if it is possible to use "HOW + Clause" or somehow like those?






grammar grammatical-structure







share|improve this question







New contributor




Vũ Bảo is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.




















  • This is proofreading, and so will be closed (it's not allowed here). But none of these work very well.
    – Peter Shor
    2 days ago












  • Your sentence is rather strange. Are you trying to say that one group of people wants to avoid being asked to sympathise with another group? If so, (3) is the only one that works (and could possibly have 'how' in front of it).
    – Kate Bunting
    2 days ago










  • There is a simple answer. “They protect themselves from HAVING their sympathy enlisted.
    – Tuffy
    2 days ago










  • Thanks you very much! “They protect themselves from HAVING their sympathy enlisted" sounds perfect!. But could you explain more, "having THEIR SYMPATHY ENLISTED", is that a Simplified relative clauses?
    – Vũ Bảo
    2 days ago












  • Which means " having their sympathy that is enlisted'.?
    – Vũ Bảo
    2 days ago













up vote
0
down vote

favorite









up vote
0
down vote

favorite











Could you please help me to fix and explain to me, which sentence is correct?



1."They protect themselves from their sympathy is enlisted"



2."They protect themselves from their sympathy to be enlisted"



3."They protect themselves from their sympathy being enlisted"



(I guess the correct sentence should be:
"*They protect themselves from the fact that their sympathy is enlisted*"
or "They protect themselves from their sympathy that is enlisted? or "They should protect their sympathy from being enlisted.")



But i want to know if it is possible to use "HOW + Clause" or somehow like those?






grammar grammatical-structure







share|improve this question







New contributor




Vũ Bảo is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











Could you please help me to fix and explain to me, which sentence is correct?



1."They protect themselves from their sympathy is enlisted"



2."They protect themselves from their sympathy to be enlisted"



3."They protect themselves from their sympathy being enlisted"



(I guess the correct sentence should be:
"*They protect themselves from the fact that their sympathy is enlisted*"
or "They protect themselves from their sympathy that is enlisted? or "They should protect their sympathy from being enlisted.")



But i want to know if it is possible to use "HOW + Clause" or somehow like those?






grammar grammatical-structure




grammar grammatical-structure






share|improve this question







New contributor




Vũ Bảo is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|improve this question







New contributor




Vũ Bảo is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this question




share|improve this question






New contributor




Vũ Bảo is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked 2 days ago









Vũ Bảo

1




1




New contributor




Vũ Bảo is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





Vũ Bảo is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






Vũ Bảo is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.












  • This is proofreading, and so will be closed (it's not allowed here). But none of these work very well.
    – Peter Shor
    2 days ago












  • Your sentence is rather strange. Are you trying to say that one group of people wants to avoid being asked to sympathise with another group? If so, (3) is the only one that works (and could possibly have 'how' in front of it).
    – Kate Bunting
    2 days ago










  • There is a simple answer. “They protect themselves from HAVING their sympathy enlisted.
    – Tuffy
    2 days ago










  • Thanks you very much! “They protect themselves from HAVING their sympathy enlisted" sounds perfect!. But could you explain more, "having THEIR SYMPATHY ENLISTED", is that a Simplified relative clauses?
    – Vũ Bảo
    2 days ago












  • Which means " having their sympathy that is enlisted'.?
    – Vũ Bảo
    2 days ago


















  • This is proofreading, and so will be closed (it's not allowed here). But none of these work very well.
    – Peter Shor
    2 days ago












  • Your sentence is rather strange. Are you trying to say that one group of people wants to avoid being asked to sympathise with another group? If so, (3) is the only one that works (and could possibly have 'how' in front of it).
    – Kate Bunting
    2 days ago










  • There is a simple answer. “They protect themselves from HAVING their sympathy enlisted.
    – Tuffy
    2 days ago










  • Thanks you very much! “They protect themselves from HAVING their sympathy enlisted" sounds perfect!. But could you explain more, "having THEIR SYMPATHY ENLISTED", is that a Simplified relative clauses?
    – Vũ Bảo
    2 days ago












  • Which means " having their sympathy that is enlisted'.?
    – Vũ Bảo
    2 days ago
















This is proofreading, and so will be closed (it's not allowed here). But none of these work very well.
– Peter Shor
2 days ago






This is proofreading, and so will be closed (it's not allowed here). But none of these work very well.
– Peter Shor
2 days ago














Your sentence is rather strange. Are you trying to say that one group of people wants to avoid being asked to sympathise with another group? If so, (3) is the only one that works (and could possibly have 'how' in front of it).
– Kate Bunting
2 days ago




Your sentence is rather strange. Are you trying to say that one group of people wants to avoid being asked to sympathise with another group? If so, (3) is the only one that works (and could possibly have 'how' in front of it).
– Kate Bunting
2 days ago












There is a simple answer. “They protect themselves from HAVING their sympathy enlisted.
– Tuffy
2 days ago




There is a simple answer. “They protect themselves from HAVING their sympathy enlisted.
– Tuffy
2 days ago












Thanks you very much! “They protect themselves from HAVING their sympathy enlisted" sounds perfect!. But could you explain more, "having THEIR SYMPATHY ENLISTED", is that a Simplified relative clauses?
– Vũ Bảo
2 days ago






Thanks you very much! “They protect themselves from HAVING their sympathy enlisted" sounds perfect!. But could you explain more, "having THEIR SYMPATHY ENLISTED", is that a Simplified relative clauses?
– Vũ Bảo
2 days ago














Which means " having their sympathy that is enlisted'.?
– Vũ Bảo
2 days ago




Which means " having their sympathy that is enlisted'.?
– Vũ Bảo
2 days ago















active

oldest

votes











Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "97"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});






Vũ Bảo is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










 

draft saved


draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f473439%2fis-it-possible-to-use-how-clause-like-those-below%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown






























active

oldest

votes













active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes








Vũ Bảo is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










 

draft saved


draft discarded


















Vũ Bảo is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.













Vũ Bảo is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












Vũ Bảo is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.















 


draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f473439%2fis-it-possible-to-use-how-clause-like-those-below%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







-

Popular posts from this blog

Paul Cézanne

Image
Pour l’article ayant un titre homophone, voir Sézanne. Paul Cézanne.mw-parser-output .entete.artiste{background-image:url("//upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/f/f3/Picto_infobox_artiste.png")} Autoportrait vers 1861 Naissance 19 janvier 1839 Aix-en-Provence (France) Décès 22 octobre 1906 (à 67 ans) Aix-en-Provence (France) Nationalité Française Activité Peintre Formation Académie de Charles Suisse Maître Joseph Gilbert, Antoine Guillemet, Camille Pissarro Mouvement Impressionnisme postimpressionnisme Influencé par Eugène Delacroix, Gustave Courbet, Véronèse A influencé Braque, Picasso, Matisse Conjoint Hortense Fiquet (depuis 1886) Enfant Paul Cézanne  ( d ) Œuvres principales La Montagne Sainte-Victoire, Portrait de madame Cézanne signature modifier - modifier le code - modifier Wikidata Paul Cézanne , né le 19 janvier 1839 à Aix-en-Provence et mort le 22 octobre 1906 dans la mê...
Read more

UIScrollView CustomStickyHeader Resize height generates problems when scroll is too fast

Image
0 I have been trying for a while to create a UIViewController that has a CustomStickyHeader and a UITableView. The idea I have been following is use the UITableView scrolling for changing the header view with the value of the contentOffset. The layout for the ViewController (AlbumsViewController) looks like: The UItableView Scrolling functions from the delegate are implemented like that: func scrollViewDidScroll(_ scrollView: UIScrollView) { let endReached = contentTableView.contentOffset.y >= (contentTableView.contentSize.height - contentTableView.frame.size.height) let isUP = lastContentOffset > scrollView.contentOffset.y if scrollView.contentOffset.y < 0 { headerHeightConstraint.constant += abs(scrollView.contentOffset.y) } else{ if !endReached{ ...
Read more

Angular material date-picker (MatDatepicker) auto completes the date on focus out

Image
3 3 I am using angular material/mat-datepicker in my project and whenever the user enters one digit inside of it, and goes out of focus - the date picker is auto completing with a random date. Example Just enter 1 and go out of focus, or enter 5/5/20 The date picker is adding date automatically Update : Also I am using reactive forms and I'm validating the input with that approach Can I disable this ? angular datepicker angular-material angular6 angular-material-datetimepicker share | improve this question edited Nov 20 '18 at 13:21 ...
Read more