Problems external pinging second interface on two NIC two subnet Windows 7
I have this configuration working fine with Linux, but Windows puts up a nasty fight.
The Windows 7 box is setup with two NICs, each for a separate subnet.
- NIC 1 is the primary interface and has the default gateway and internet access.
- NIC 2 is a secondary interface to a small private subnet with no default gateway.
Everything works fine from the Windows box. I can ping and get connections over the expected interface to the appropriate subnet; pings and connections for the NIC 2 subnet work over NIC 2 and pings and connections on NIC 1 work fine.
The problem is Windows doesn't respond to external pings on NIC 2. The interface stats on Windows show that the pings are arriving, but there is no response to them. External pings to NIC 1 are fine.
Firewall is disabled.
Any suggestions would be appreciated. This same setup works without any issues on Linux.
Windows IP Configuration
Ethernet adapter Local Area Connection 2:
Connection-specific DNS Suffix . :
Link-local IPv6 Address . . . . . : fe80::cd15:7e83:1dd8:4531%14
IPv4 Address. . . . . . . . . . . : 192.168.1.7
Subnet Mask . . . . . . . . . . . : 255.255.255.0
Default Gateway . . . . . . . . . :
Ethernet adapter Local Area Connection:
Connection-specific DNS Suffix . : nowhere.com
Link-local IPv6 Address . . . . . : fe80::2c63:4544:c29d:5dfd%11
IPv4 Address. . . . . . . . . . . : 10.13.132.63
Subnet Mask . . . . . . . . . . . : 255.255.255.0
Default Gateway . . . . . . . . . : 10.13.132.1
$ route print
===========================================================================
Interface List
14...52 54 00 24 8b 8e ......Red Hat VirtIO Ethernet Adapter #2
11...54 52 00 77 87 59 ......Red Hat VirtIO Ethernet Adapter
1...........................Software Loopback Interface 1
12...00 00 00 00 00 00 00 e0 Microsoft ISATAP Adapter
13...00 00 00 00 00 00 00 e0 Teredo Tunneling Pseudo-Interface
15...00 00 00 00 00 00 00 e0 Microsoft ISATAP Adapter #2
===========================================================================
IPv4 Route Table
===========================================================================
Active Routes:
Network Destination Netmask Gateway Interface Metric
0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 10.13.132.1 10.13.132.63 266
10.13.132.0 255.255.255.0 On-link 10.13.132.63 266
10.13.132.63 255.255.255.255 On-link 10.13.132.63 266
10.13.132.255 255.255.255.255 On-link 10.13.132.63 266
127.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 On-link 127.0.0.1 306
127.0.0.1 255.255.255.255 On-link 127.0.0.1 306
127.255.255.255 255.255.255.255 On-link 127.0.0.1 306
192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0 On-link 192.168.1.7 266
192.168.1.7 255.255.255.255 On-link 192.168.1.7 266
192.168.1.255 255.255.255.255 On-link 192.168.1.7 266
224.0.0.0 240.0.0.0 On-link 127.0.0.1 306
224.0.0.0 240.0.0.0 On-link 10.13.132.63 266
224.0.0.0 240.0.0.0 On-link 192.168.1.7 266
255.255.255.255 255.255.255.255 On-link 127.0.0.1 306
255.255.255.255 255.255.255.255 On-link 10.13.132.63 266
255.255.255.255 255.255.255.255 On-link 192.168.1.7 266
===========================================================================
Persistent Routes:
Network Address Netmask Gateway Address Metric
0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 10.13.132.1 Default
===========================================================================
windows-7 networking network-adapter
add a comment |
I have this configuration working fine with Linux, but Windows puts up a nasty fight.
The Windows 7 box is setup with two NICs, each for a separate subnet.
- NIC 1 is the primary interface and has the default gateway and internet access.
- NIC 2 is a secondary interface to a small private subnet with no default gateway.
Everything works fine from the Windows box. I can ping and get connections over the expected interface to the appropriate subnet; pings and connections for the NIC 2 subnet work over NIC 2 and pings and connections on NIC 1 work fine.
The problem is Windows doesn't respond to external pings on NIC 2. The interface stats on Windows show that the pings are arriving, but there is no response to them. External pings to NIC 1 are fine.
Firewall is disabled.
Any suggestions would be appreciated. This same setup works without any issues on Linux.
Windows IP Configuration
Ethernet adapter Local Area Connection 2:
Connection-specific DNS Suffix . :
Link-local IPv6 Address . . . . . : fe80::cd15:7e83:1dd8:4531%14
IPv4 Address. . . . . . . . . . . : 192.168.1.7
Subnet Mask . . . . . . . . . . . : 255.255.255.0
Default Gateway . . . . . . . . . :
Ethernet adapter Local Area Connection:
Connection-specific DNS Suffix . : nowhere.com
Link-local IPv6 Address . . . . . : fe80::2c63:4544:c29d:5dfd%11
IPv4 Address. . . . . . . . . . . : 10.13.132.63
Subnet Mask . . . . . . . . . . . : 255.255.255.0
Default Gateway . . . . . . . . . : 10.13.132.1
$ route print
===========================================================================
Interface List
14...52 54 00 24 8b 8e ......Red Hat VirtIO Ethernet Adapter #2
11...54 52 00 77 87 59 ......Red Hat VirtIO Ethernet Adapter
1...........................Software Loopback Interface 1
12...00 00 00 00 00 00 00 e0 Microsoft ISATAP Adapter
13...00 00 00 00 00 00 00 e0 Teredo Tunneling Pseudo-Interface
15...00 00 00 00 00 00 00 e0 Microsoft ISATAP Adapter #2
===========================================================================
IPv4 Route Table
===========================================================================
Active Routes:
Network Destination Netmask Gateway Interface Metric
0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 10.13.132.1 10.13.132.63 266
10.13.132.0 255.255.255.0 On-link 10.13.132.63 266
10.13.132.63 255.255.255.255 On-link 10.13.132.63 266
10.13.132.255 255.255.255.255 On-link 10.13.132.63 266
127.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 On-link 127.0.0.1 306
127.0.0.1 255.255.255.255 On-link 127.0.0.1 306
127.255.255.255 255.255.255.255 On-link 127.0.0.1 306
192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0 On-link 192.168.1.7 266
192.168.1.7 255.255.255.255 On-link 192.168.1.7 266
192.168.1.255 255.255.255.255 On-link 192.168.1.7 266
224.0.0.0 240.0.0.0 On-link 127.0.0.1 306
224.0.0.0 240.0.0.0 On-link 10.13.132.63 266
224.0.0.0 240.0.0.0 On-link 192.168.1.7 266
255.255.255.255 255.255.255.255 On-link 127.0.0.1 306
255.255.255.255 255.255.255.255 On-link 10.13.132.63 266
255.255.255.255 255.255.255.255 On-link 192.168.1.7 266
===========================================================================
Persistent Routes:
Network Address Netmask Gateway Address Metric
0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 10.13.132.1 Default
===========================================================================
windows-7 networking network-adapter
You have to manually setup the persistent route. Windows doesn't do this automatically. Failing to setup the persistent route prevents access to the 192.168.1.0 subnet. Try it. Windows SHOULD do this but doesn't. It is automatically handled in Linux for example. All firewalls are disabled. If the firewall was on, the traffic count on NIC 2 would not increase from the external pings.
– Chris Welch
Oct 3 '14 at 15:35
1
Tore down the interface and set it up again and the default routing does setup a 192.168.1.0 entry. So the persistent route is not necessary. Updated posting with revised routing table display.
– Chris Welch
Oct 3 '14 at 15:58
Any luck disabling any firewalls?
– Twisty Impersonator
Oct 3 '14 at 18:51
As stated, there are no firewalls. Problem still stands
– Chris Welch
Oct 6 '14 at 15:48
@ChrisWelch I have the same problem, did you find the answer?
– hamed
Jun 11 '16 at 8:31
add a comment |
I have this configuration working fine with Linux, but Windows puts up a nasty fight.
The Windows 7 box is setup with two NICs, each for a separate subnet.
- NIC 1 is the primary interface and has the default gateway and internet access.
- NIC 2 is a secondary interface to a small private subnet with no default gateway.
Everything works fine from the Windows box. I can ping and get connections over the expected interface to the appropriate subnet; pings and connections for the NIC 2 subnet work over NIC 2 and pings and connections on NIC 1 work fine.
The problem is Windows doesn't respond to external pings on NIC 2. The interface stats on Windows show that the pings are arriving, but there is no response to them. External pings to NIC 1 are fine.
Firewall is disabled.
Any suggestions would be appreciated. This same setup works without any issues on Linux.
Windows IP Configuration
Ethernet adapter Local Area Connection 2:
Connection-specific DNS Suffix . :
Link-local IPv6 Address . . . . . : fe80::cd15:7e83:1dd8:4531%14
IPv4 Address. . . . . . . . . . . : 192.168.1.7
Subnet Mask . . . . . . . . . . . : 255.255.255.0
Default Gateway . . . . . . . . . :
Ethernet adapter Local Area Connection:
Connection-specific DNS Suffix . : nowhere.com
Link-local IPv6 Address . . . . . : fe80::2c63:4544:c29d:5dfd%11
IPv4 Address. . . . . . . . . . . : 10.13.132.63
Subnet Mask . . . . . . . . . . . : 255.255.255.0
Default Gateway . . . . . . . . . : 10.13.132.1
$ route print
===========================================================================
Interface List
14...52 54 00 24 8b 8e ......Red Hat VirtIO Ethernet Adapter #2
11...54 52 00 77 87 59 ......Red Hat VirtIO Ethernet Adapter
1...........................Software Loopback Interface 1
12...00 00 00 00 00 00 00 e0 Microsoft ISATAP Adapter
13...00 00 00 00 00 00 00 e0 Teredo Tunneling Pseudo-Interface
15...00 00 00 00 00 00 00 e0 Microsoft ISATAP Adapter #2
===========================================================================
IPv4 Route Table
===========================================================================
Active Routes:
Network Destination Netmask Gateway Interface Metric
0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 10.13.132.1 10.13.132.63 266
10.13.132.0 255.255.255.0 On-link 10.13.132.63 266
10.13.132.63 255.255.255.255 On-link 10.13.132.63 266
10.13.132.255 255.255.255.255 On-link 10.13.132.63 266
127.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 On-link 127.0.0.1 306
127.0.0.1 255.255.255.255 On-link 127.0.0.1 306
127.255.255.255 255.255.255.255 On-link 127.0.0.1 306
192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0 On-link 192.168.1.7 266
192.168.1.7 255.255.255.255 On-link 192.168.1.7 266
192.168.1.255 255.255.255.255 On-link 192.168.1.7 266
224.0.0.0 240.0.0.0 On-link 127.0.0.1 306
224.0.0.0 240.0.0.0 On-link 10.13.132.63 266
224.0.0.0 240.0.0.0 On-link 192.168.1.7 266
255.255.255.255 255.255.255.255 On-link 127.0.0.1 306
255.255.255.255 255.255.255.255 On-link 10.13.132.63 266
255.255.255.255 255.255.255.255 On-link 192.168.1.7 266
===========================================================================
Persistent Routes:
Network Address Netmask Gateway Address Metric
0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 10.13.132.1 Default
===========================================================================
windows-7 networking network-adapter
I have this configuration working fine with Linux, but Windows puts up a nasty fight.
The Windows 7 box is setup with two NICs, each for a separate subnet.
- NIC 1 is the primary interface and has the default gateway and internet access.
- NIC 2 is a secondary interface to a small private subnet with no default gateway.
Everything works fine from the Windows box. I can ping and get connections over the expected interface to the appropriate subnet; pings and connections for the NIC 2 subnet work over NIC 2 and pings and connections on NIC 1 work fine.
The problem is Windows doesn't respond to external pings on NIC 2. The interface stats on Windows show that the pings are arriving, but there is no response to them. External pings to NIC 1 are fine.
Firewall is disabled.
Any suggestions would be appreciated. This same setup works without any issues on Linux.
Windows IP Configuration
Ethernet adapter Local Area Connection 2:
Connection-specific DNS Suffix . :
Link-local IPv6 Address . . . . . : fe80::cd15:7e83:1dd8:4531%14
IPv4 Address. . . . . . . . . . . : 192.168.1.7
Subnet Mask . . . . . . . . . . . : 255.255.255.0
Default Gateway . . . . . . . . . :
Ethernet adapter Local Area Connection:
Connection-specific DNS Suffix . : nowhere.com
Link-local IPv6 Address . . . . . : fe80::2c63:4544:c29d:5dfd%11
IPv4 Address. . . . . . . . . . . : 10.13.132.63
Subnet Mask . . . . . . . . . . . : 255.255.255.0
Default Gateway . . . . . . . . . : 10.13.132.1
$ route print
===========================================================================
Interface List
14...52 54 00 24 8b 8e ......Red Hat VirtIO Ethernet Adapter #2
11...54 52 00 77 87 59 ......Red Hat VirtIO Ethernet Adapter
1...........................Software Loopback Interface 1
12...00 00 00 00 00 00 00 e0 Microsoft ISATAP Adapter
13...00 00 00 00 00 00 00 e0 Teredo Tunneling Pseudo-Interface
15...00 00 00 00 00 00 00 e0 Microsoft ISATAP Adapter #2
===========================================================================
IPv4 Route Table
===========================================================================
Active Routes:
Network Destination Netmask Gateway Interface Metric
0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 10.13.132.1 10.13.132.63 266
10.13.132.0 255.255.255.0 On-link 10.13.132.63 266
10.13.132.63 255.255.255.255 On-link 10.13.132.63 266
10.13.132.255 255.255.255.255 On-link 10.13.132.63 266
127.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 On-link 127.0.0.1 306
127.0.0.1 255.255.255.255 On-link 127.0.0.1 306
127.255.255.255 255.255.255.255 On-link 127.0.0.1 306
192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0 On-link 192.168.1.7 266
192.168.1.7 255.255.255.255 On-link 192.168.1.7 266
192.168.1.255 255.255.255.255 On-link 192.168.1.7 266
224.0.0.0 240.0.0.0 On-link 127.0.0.1 306
224.0.0.0 240.0.0.0 On-link 10.13.132.63 266
224.0.0.0 240.0.0.0 On-link 192.168.1.7 266
255.255.255.255 255.255.255.255 On-link 127.0.0.1 306
255.255.255.255 255.255.255.255 On-link 10.13.132.63 266
255.255.255.255 255.255.255.255 On-link 192.168.1.7 266
===========================================================================
Persistent Routes:
Network Address Netmask Gateway Address Metric
0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 10.13.132.1 Default
===========================================================================
windows-7 networking network-adapter
windows-7 networking network-adapter
edited Oct 3 '14 at 16:02
asked Oct 3 '14 at 14:36
Chris Welch
1113
1113
You have to manually setup the persistent route. Windows doesn't do this automatically. Failing to setup the persistent route prevents access to the 192.168.1.0 subnet. Try it. Windows SHOULD do this but doesn't. It is automatically handled in Linux for example. All firewalls are disabled. If the firewall was on, the traffic count on NIC 2 would not increase from the external pings.
– Chris Welch
Oct 3 '14 at 15:35
1
Tore down the interface and set it up again and the default routing does setup a 192.168.1.0 entry. So the persistent route is not necessary. Updated posting with revised routing table display.
– Chris Welch
Oct 3 '14 at 15:58
Any luck disabling any firewalls?
– Twisty Impersonator
Oct 3 '14 at 18:51
As stated, there are no firewalls. Problem still stands
– Chris Welch
Oct 6 '14 at 15:48
@ChrisWelch I have the same problem, did you find the answer?
– hamed
Jun 11 '16 at 8:31
add a comment |
You have to manually setup the persistent route. Windows doesn't do this automatically. Failing to setup the persistent route prevents access to the 192.168.1.0 subnet. Try it. Windows SHOULD do this but doesn't. It is automatically handled in Linux for example. All firewalls are disabled. If the firewall was on, the traffic count on NIC 2 would not increase from the external pings.
– Chris Welch
Oct 3 '14 at 15:35
1
Tore down the interface and set it up again and the default routing does setup a 192.168.1.0 entry. So the persistent route is not necessary. Updated posting with revised routing table display.
– Chris Welch
Oct 3 '14 at 15:58
Any luck disabling any firewalls?
– Twisty Impersonator
Oct 3 '14 at 18:51
As stated, there are no firewalls. Problem still stands
– Chris Welch
Oct 6 '14 at 15:48
@ChrisWelch I have the same problem, did you find the answer?
– hamed
Jun 11 '16 at 8:31
You have to manually setup the persistent route. Windows doesn't do this automatically. Failing to setup the persistent route prevents access to the 192.168.1.0 subnet. Try it. Windows SHOULD do this but doesn't. It is automatically handled in Linux for example. All firewalls are disabled. If the firewall was on, the traffic count on NIC 2 would not increase from the external pings.
– Chris Welch
Oct 3 '14 at 15:35
You have to manually setup the persistent route. Windows doesn't do this automatically. Failing to setup the persistent route prevents access to the 192.168.1.0 subnet. Try it. Windows SHOULD do this but doesn't. It is automatically handled in Linux for example. All firewalls are disabled. If the firewall was on, the traffic count on NIC 2 would not increase from the external pings.
– Chris Welch
Oct 3 '14 at 15:35
1
1
Tore down the interface and set it up again and the default routing does setup a 192.168.1.0 entry. So the persistent route is not necessary. Updated posting with revised routing table display.
– Chris Welch
Oct 3 '14 at 15:58
Tore down the interface and set it up again and the default routing does setup a 192.168.1.0 entry. So the persistent route is not necessary. Updated posting with revised routing table display.
– Chris Welch
Oct 3 '14 at 15:58
Any luck disabling any firewalls?
– Twisty Impersonator
Oct 3 '14 at 18:51
Any luck disabling any firewalls?
– Twisty Impersonator
Oct 3 '14 at 18:51
As stated, there are no firewalls. Problem still stands
– Chris Welch
Oct 6 '14 at 15:48
As stated, there are no firewalls. Problem still stands
– Chris Welch
Oct 6 '14 at 15:48
@ChrisWelch I have the same problem, did you find the answer?
– hamed
Jun 11 '16 at 8:31
@ChrisWelch I have the same problem, did you find the answer?
– hamed
Jun 11 '16 at 8:31
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
Windows Firewall (or another software-based firewall, if you have one) may be blocking the ping response on your second NIC. For testing purposes, disable the firewall. If that solves the problem, you can add an appropriate rule to allow ping responses out of the second interface.
I would also discourage manually creating a static route to the second interface's subnet. Windows knows that subnet is reachable only via that NIC because of the IP address/subnet mask combination you have specified on NIC 2. The only reason you would need to manually specify a route for NIC2 is if there are additional subnetnetworks only reachable through that interface, in which case there would be a router somewhere on NIC 2's network as well.
IMHO, doing something manually that is already done automatically is adding another variable to complicate the problem you're troubleshooting today, or worse, unnecessarily setting up a future problem.
add a comment |
If the pings to NIC 2 are coming from a different subnet/network, such as 10.0.0.0/8, then your ping responses back will get sent out the default gateway, on NIC 1. This is because the ping response is targeting a 10.0.0.0/8 address, and traffic to such an address, by the routing table, will go out through NIC 1. The pinging computer doesn't recognize the IP on NIC 1 as the IP that it is pinging, so it drops the received ping response.
Unfortunately, I don't have a solution at this point, only an explanation.
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "3"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsuperuser.com%2fquestions%2f820337%2fproblems-external-pinging-second-interface-on-two-nic-two-subnet-windows-7%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Windows Firewall (or another software-based firewall, if you have one) may be blocking the ping response on your second NIC. For testing purposes, disable the firewall. If that solves the problem, you can add an appropriate rule to allow ping responses out of the second interface.
I would also discourage manually creating a static route to the second interface's subnet. Windows knows that subnet is reachable only via that NIC because of the IP address/subnet mask combination you have specified on NIC 2. The only reason you would need to manually specify a route for NIC2 is if there are additional subnetnetworks only reachable through that interface, in which case there would be a router somewhere on NIC 2's network as well.
IMHO, doing something manually that is already done automatically is adding another variable to complicate the problem you're troubleshooting today, or worse, unnecessarily setting up a future problem.
add a comment |
Windows Firewall (or another software-based firewall, if you have one) may be blocking the ping response on your second NIC. For testing purposes, disable the firewall. If that solves the problem, you can add an appropriate rule to allow ping responses out of the second interface.
I would also discourage manually creating a static route to the second interface's subnet. Windows knows that subnet is reachable only via that NIC because of the IP address/subnet mask combination you have specified on NIC 2. The only reason you would need to manually specify a route for NIC2 is if there are additional subnetnetworks only reachable through that interface, in which case there would be a router somewhere on NIC 2's network as well.
IMHO, doing something manually that is already done automatically is adding another variable to complicate the problem you're troubleshooting today, or worse, unnecessarily setting up a future problem.
add a comment |
Windows Firewall (or another software-based firewall, if you have one) may be blocking the ping response on your second NIC. For testing purposes, disable the firewall. If that solves the problem, you can add an appropriate rule to allow ping responses out of the second interface.
I would also discourage manually creating a static route to the second interface's subnet. Windows knows that subnet is reachable only via that NIC because of the IP address/subnet mask combination you have specified on NIC 2. The only reason you would need to manually specify a route for NIC2 is if there are additional subnetnetworks only reachable through that interface, in which case there would be a router somewhere on NIC 2's network as well.
IMHO, doing something manually that is already done automatically is adding another variable to complicate the problem you're troubleshooting today, or worse, unnecessarily setting up a future problem.
Windows Firewall (or another software-based firewall, if you have one) may be blocking the ping response on your second NIC. For testing purposes, disable the firewall. If that solves the problem, you can add an appropriate rule to allow ping responses out of the second interface.
I would also discourage manually creating a static route to the second interface's subnet. Windows knows that subnet is reachable only via that NIC because of the IP address/subnet mask combination you have specified on NIC 2. The only reason you would need to manually specify a route for NIC2 is if there are additional subnetnetworks only reachable through that interface, in which case there would be a router somewhere on NIC 2's network as well.
IMHO, doing something manually that is already done automatically is adding another variable to complicate the problem you're troubleshooting today, or worse, unnecessarily setting up a future problem.
answered Oct 3 '14 at 15:08
Twisty Impersonator
17.7k136395
17.7k136395
add a comment |
add a comment |
If the pings to NIC 2 are coming from a different subnet/network, such as 10.0.0.0/8, then your ping responses back will get sent out the default gateway, on NIC 1. This is because the ping response is targeting a 10.0.0.0/8 address, and traffic to such an address, by the routing table, will go out through NIC 1. The pinging computer doesn't recognize the IP on NIC 1 as the IP that it is pinging, so it drops the received ping response.
Unfortunately, I don't have a solution at this point, only an explanation.
add a comment |
If the pings to NIC 2 are coming from a different subnet/network, such as 10.0.0.0/8, then your ping responses back will get sent out the default gateway, on NIC 1. This is because the ping response is targeting a 10.0.0.0/8 address, and traffic to such an address, by the routing table, will go out through NIC 1. The pinging computer doesn't recognize the IP on NIC 1 as the IP that it is pinging, so it drops the received ping response.
Unfortunately, I don't have a solution at this point, only an explanation.
add a comment |
If the pings to NIC 2 are coming from a different subnet/network, such as 10.0.0.0/8, then your ping responses back will get sent out the default gateway, on NIC 1. This is because the ping response is targeting a 10.0.0.0/8 address, and traffic to such an address, by the routing table, will go out through NIC 1. The pinging computer doesn't recognize the IP on NIC 1 as the IP that it is pinging, so it drops the received ping response.
Unfortunately, I don't have a solution at this point, only an explanation.
If the pings to NIC 2 are coming from a different subnet/network, such as 10.0.0.0/8, then your ping responses back will get sent out the default gateway, on NIC 1. This is because the ping response is targeting a 10.0.0.0/8 address, and traffic to such an address, by the routing table, will go out through NIC 1. The pinging computer doesn't recognize the IP on NIC 1 as the IP that it is pinging, so it drops the received ping response.
Unfortunately, I don't have a solution at this point, only an explanation.
answered Dec 20 '17 at 17:23
Michael
1
1
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Super User!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsuperuser.com%2fquestions%2f820337%2fproblems-external-pinging-second-interface-on-two-nic-two-subnet-windows-7%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
You have to manually setup the persistent route. Windows doesn't do this automatically. Failing to setup the persistent route prevents access to the 192.168.1.0 subnet. Try it. Windows SHOULD do this but doesn't. It is automatically handled in Linux for example. All firewalls are disabled. If the firewall was on, the traffic count on NIC 2 would not increase from the external pings.
– Chris Welch
Oct 3 '14 at 15:35
1
Tore down the interface and set it up again and the default routing does setup a 192.168.1.0 entry. So the persistent route is not necessary. Updated posting with revised routing table display.
– Chris Welch
Oct 3 '14 at 15:58
Any luck disabling any firewalls?
– Twisty Impersonator
Oct 3 '14 at 18:51
As stated, there are no firewalls. Problem still stands
– Chris Welch
Oct 6 '14 at 15:48
@ChrisWelch I have the same problem, did you find the answer?
– hamed
Jun 11 '16 at 8:31