Can I put the link to my personal website in my work email signature?
I have a website that basically functions as a resume/project record where I list my various master degree research projects, personal projects, and work history.
Since I use my work email to communicate with many clients and maybe potential future employers, I would like to put a link to this website in my email signature for work.
Would this be considered professional?
Note: It isn't some sort of glorified MySpace page, it is a tasteful professional website to keep a log of my project history as an engineer.
professionalism email
|
show 6 more comments
I have a website that basically functions as a resume/project record where I list my various master degree research projects, personal projects, and work history.
Since I use my work email to communicate with many clients and maybe potential future employers, I would like to put a link to this website in my email signature for work.
Would this be considered professional?
Note: It isn't some sort of glorified MySpace page, it is a tasteful professional website to keep a log of my project history as an engineer.
professionalism email
21
No need to apologise in your topic. Some things might be more obvious to some, not to others. You had a gut feeling that it might be weird, researched it and came to an conclusion. sic vita est. A lot better than ignoring that feeling
– Martijn
yesterday
1
@RichardU yes, I am now aware that this was a horrible idea and will not be doing so. my apologies
– user91949
yesterday
2
I can't comment on how good an idea this is in US culture (and I make it a point to strictly separate email address usage), but in the European environment I've very often seen colleagues put their LinkedIn profiles in their corporate email signatures. (As to the rest of the question, yeah, don't do that.)
– Christoph Burschka
yesterday
9
@throwaway we all have bad ideas, you were smart enough to realize yours, which makes you smarter than most of us.
– Richard U
yesterday
5
It is incorrect to vote to close this as opinion based.
– Fattie
yesterday
|
show 6 more comments
I have a website that basically functions as a resume/project record where I list my various master degree research projects, personal projects, and work history.
Since I use my work email to communicate with many clients and maybe potential future employers, I would like to put a link to this website in my email signature for work.
Would this be considered professional?
Note: It isn't some sort of glorified MySpace page, it is a tasteful professional website to keep a log of my project history as an engineer.
professionalism email
I have a website that basically functions as a resume/project record where I list my various master degree research projects, personal projects, and work history.
Since I use my work email to communicate with many clients and maybe potential future employers, I would like to put a link to this website in my email signature for work.
Would this be considered professional?
Note: It isn't some sort of glorified MySpace page, it is a tasteful professional website to keep a log of my project history as an engineer.
professionalism email
professionalism email
edited 4 hours ago
Dukeling
9,57832549
9,57832549
asked yesterday
user91949
21
No need to apologise in your topic. Some things might be more obvious to some, not to others. You had a gut feeling that it might be weird, researched it and came to an conclusion. sic vita est. A lot better than ignoring that feeling
– Martijn
yesterday
1
@RichardU yes, I am now aware that this was a horrible idea and will not be doing so. my apologies
– user91949
yesterday
2
I can't comment on how good an idea this is in US culture (and I make it a point to strictly separate email address usage), but in the European environment I've very often seen colleagues put their LinkedIn profiles in their corporate email signatures. (As to the rest of the question, yeah, don't do that.)
– Christoph Burschka
yesterday
9
@throwaway we all have bad ideas, you were smart enough to realize yours, which makes you smarter than most of us.
– Richard U
yesterday
5
It is incorrect to vote to close this as opinion based.
– Fattie
yesterday
|
show 6 more comments
21
No need to apologise in your topic. Some things might be more obvious to some, not to others. You had a gut feeling that it might be weird, researched it and came to an conclusion. sic vita est. A lot better than ignoring that feeling
– Martijn
yesterday
1
@RichardU yes, I am now aware that this was a horrible idea and will not be doing so. my apologies
– user91949
yesterday
2
I can't comment on how good an idea this is in US culture (and I make it a point to strictly separate email address usage), but in the European environment I've very often seen colleagues put their LinkedIn profiles in their corporate email signatures. (As to the rest of the question, yeah, don't do that.)
– Christoph Burschka
yesterday
9
@throwaway we all have bad ideas, you were smart enough to realize yours, which makes you smarter than most of us.
– Richard U
yesterday
5
It is incorrect to vote to close this as opinion based.
– Fattie
yesterday
21
21
No need to apologise in your topic. Some things might be more obvious to some, not to others. You had a gut feeling that it might be weird, researched it and came to an conclusion. sic vita est. A lot better than ignoring that feeling
– Martijn
yesterday
No need to apologise in your topic. Some things might be more obvious to some, not to others. You had a gut feeling that it might be weird, researched it and came to an conclusion. sic vita est. A lot better than ignoring that feeling
– Martijn
yesterday
1
1
@RichardU yes, I am now aware that this was a horrible idea and will not be doing so. my apologies
– user91949
yesterday
@RichardU yes, I am now aware that this was a horrible idea and will not be doing so. my apologies
– user91949
yesterday
2
2
I can't comment on how good an idea this is in US culture (and I make it a point to strictly separate email address usage), but in the European environment I've very often seen colleagues put their LinkedIn profiles in their corporate email signatures. (As to the rest of the question, yeah, don't do that.)
– Christoph Burschka
yesterday
I can't comment on how good an idea this is in US culture (and I make it a point to strictly separate email address usage), but in the European environment I've very often seen colleagues put their LinkedIn profiles in their corporate email signatures. (As to the rest of the question, yeah, don't do that.)
– Christoph Burschka
yesterday
9
9
@throwaway we all have bad ideas, you were smart enough to realize yours, which makes you smarter than most of us.
– Richard U
yesterday
@throwaway we all have bad ideas, you were smart enough to realize yours, which makes you smarter than most of us.
– Richard U
yesterday
5
5
It is incorrect to vote to close this as opinion based.
– Fattie
yesterday
It is incorrect to vote to close this as opinion based.
– Fattie
yesterday
|
show 6 more comments
7 Answers
7
active
oldest
votes
No, you don't get to do your self-promotion via a work-email, unless the link points to an official source provided / hosted by the organization you work for.
Since I use my work email to communicate with many clients and maybe potential future employers [...]
Stop doing that immediately if the purpose is to seek / influence/ communicate from the viewpoint of "potential future employers". As per law in most of the cases, you're supposed to use company provided resources (yes, your email is one of them) for official work purposes, and searching for another job is not "official" work (i.e., you don't get paid for that).
Existing client or not, for getting in touch with potential employers, use your personal email address.
Client communication is just fine as long as it is limited to working communication / collaboration.
11
Additional point is that the employer should have the ability to read anything you send/receive via that company's email server.
– Peter M
yesterday
5
Some small companies may have an "About our employees" page with profiles that may include likes to employees' personal web sites. I would regard a personal web site link within an email as appropriate in such cases, but would expect that the individual refrain from putting anything on the web site that might reflect negatively on the employer. That may mean having a "formal" personal web site separate from a less-formal one which is not linked from the employer.
– supercat
yesterday
1
Also consider the liability aspect from the company's point of view. They can't control the content of your personal website, so they won't want even the appearance that it's connected to the business in any way. If a client clicks on that link and goes to your site, which was hacked and is now serving up viruses, they'll be quite upset with your company.
– bta
yesterday
add a comment |
Definitely not, using work resources for personal promotion is not a good idea.
But there's nothing wrong with including a link to your personal site on your LinkedIn profile.
While it is common, but usually not encouraged to add any off-site links , including linkedin, to your business email signature. Most organizations have a policy on creating and using signatures, and I've never come across any which allows linkedin explicitly. Just saying.
– Sourav Ghosh
yesterday
Absolutely, I have done so via LinkedIn already. I know am sure it is a bad idea. thank you. (at my company almost all employees with LinkedIn include them in their signatures, including management)
– user91949
yesterday
1
@throwaway Dont do it just because everyone else does. Be sure about the policy. If there isn't one, ask the HR or your manager for guidance (preferably written).
– Sourav Ghosh
yesterday
2
Your right, I apologize for this sort of mentality. your are right in the concept of "just because everyone else is". But my company is small enough that they don't really have policies one way or the other. Both my manager and the HR staff do it as well, which I understand doesn't automatically give me the clearance to do so
– user91949
yesterday
add a comment |
Many companies have policies or guidelines regarding email signature blocks. So start there.
I would expect that even one without guidelines would not like employees to include a link to a site not related to their company or your project.
Since I use my work email to communicate with many clients and maybe
potential future employers, I would like to put a link to this website
in my email signature for work.
Don't try and talk to future employers with a email address of your current employer. They don't like that. You also don't want to lose your only way of communicating with future employers on your last day of work.
Right, all good points. I wasn't thinking to actually do job offer related communications via that email, it was more, provide alternate ways of contacting. This is why I checked before doing. Thank you
– user91949
yesterday
add a comment |
This is a decent idea if you own your own company and the email address.
If you're not a business owner and you work for someone else, this is not the best idea.
add a comment |
There is one exception to firm no provided by Sourav Ghosh.
If, and only if you work not as employee, but as an one-person company on B2B (business to business) agreement with your "employer" you may be allowed, or even required by law*, to disclose it. And link to your business website may be acceptable way to do it.
Always consult your contact in your "employer" company before doing it. They may have specific rules or guidelines about it.
* I am not a lawyer. If you don't know how it is for you, in your jurisdiction, you need a lawyer.
3
Nah, I am a regular employee. So I shall not be doing this, thank you for the response
– user91949
yesterday
add a comment |
No. As an employer, the last thing I want to see is someone's personal website. This indicates 'side projects,' which we all know are important and practical, but suggests (right or wrong) that the person is working on it during office hours.
I'm not a stickler, and hope everyone has a healthy work-life balance including keeping personal tabs during office hours, but don't put it on your office signature going out to my internal and external contacts. Stop immediately is my advice to you as a member of an organization that is growing and supported by you.
2
I haven't even begun to do so,this is why I asked before doing so. Thanks
– user91949
yesterday
@throwaway - Excellent. When you become social with your coworkers and other agency folks, even sharing Facebook for fun or whatever, then of course have a healthy relationship of sharing your personal projects with them; but not on your official e-mail nor on your business cards, etc. I wouldn't even include a LinkedIn on your e-mail. If people want to find you, they can or you can tell them personally.
– Mikey
yesterday
add a comment |
I think it depends. Most of the time you shouldn't do that. Of course, if you do that, you need some kind of approval from your immediate boss (and you clearly need to separate professional matters from others). Don't do that without such an approval. Never divulge something on the Web that your employer would be unhappy of.
I am doing that all the time (with some informal approval from my boss), so this is another exception (to the accepted answer). And so are most of my colleagues, and sometimes my direct boss and my N+2 boss.
The reason is simple, but highly specific. My employer organization (the DoE equivalent in France, CEA) is somehow a research, French state owned, organization (but also the institution making nuclear warheads for the French state). For burocratic "soviet-like" reasons I won't explain in details here (but which are public and available in some Court des Comptes report written in French), we practically are not allowed to have any professional web page within CEA, that is under the .cea.fr TLD. But we all (and that includes my colleagues, my boss, my boss' boss) have some more of less "professional" web pages "somewhere" else. And we practically use them, e.g. to find H2020 research partners, to put preprint of reports, etc.
In practice, getting a web site inside CEA visible from outside is so bureaucratic (requiring dozens of internal meetings) that most of CEA web pages are obsolete, scientifically speaking. Practically speaking, there is more grey knowledge (from CEA employees, with approval from their boss) outside of .cea.fr than inside it.
But we (research engineers at CEA, LIST) nearly all have a web page somewhere, and when I did found (and that happened more than once) some H2020 research partners with my personal web page, both my boss and his own boss congratulated me.
But CEA is a special case. I hope (and I know) that most other similar government-owned research institutions in other countries are more flexible.
This is a (shameful) peculiarity of France. As a country we both love and hate bureaucracy. Why is it so it outside of my expertise. French President E.Macron nominated (with the approval of Prime minister E.Philippe) at the head of CEA François Jacq with the explicit mission to reduce that bureaucracy (inside CEA).
PS. Right now (in start of 2019), I (and my work on bismon) am funded with both the DECODER and the CHARIOT H2020 projects. And in both cases, I did found H2020 partners using a few sentences on my personal web pages, and my boss knows that, and was happy of that.
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "423"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: false,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworkplace.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f127877%2fcan-i-put-the-link-to-my-personal-website-in-my-work-email-signature%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(function () {
$("#show-editor-button input, #show-editor-button button").click(function () {
var showEditor = function() {
$("#show-editor-button").hide();
$("#post-form").removeClass("dno");
StackExchange.editor.finallyInit();
};
var useFancy = $(this).data('confirm-use-fancy');
if(useFancy == 'True') {
var popupTitle = $(this).data('confirm-fancy-title');
var popupBody = $(this).data('confirm-fancy-body');
var popupAccept = $(this).data('confirm-fancy-accept-button');
$(this).loadPopup({
url: '/post/self-answer-popup',
loaded: function(popup) {
var pTitle = $(popup).find('h2');
var pBody = $(popup).find('.popup-body');
var pSubmit = $(popup).find('.popup-submit');
pTitle.text(popupTitle);
pBody.html(popupBody);
pSubmit.val(popupAccept).click(showEditor);
}
})
} else{
var confirmText = $(this).data('confirm-text');
if (confirmText ? confirm(confirmText) : true) {
showEditor();
}
}
});
});
7 Answers
7
active
oldest
votes
7 Answers
7
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
No, you don't get to do your self-promotion via a work-email, unless the link points to an official source provided / hosted by the organization you work for.
Since I use my work email to communicate with many clients and maybe potential future employers [...]
Stop doing that immediately if the purpose is to seek / influence/ communicate from the viewpoint of "potential future employers". As per law in most of the cases, you're supposed to use company provided resources (yes, your email is one of them) for official work purposes, and searching for another job is not "official" work (i.e., you don't get paid for that).
Existing client or not, for getting in touch with potential employers, use your personal email address.
Client communication is just fine as long as it is limited to working communication / collaboration.
11
Additional point is that the employer should have the ability to read anything you send/receive via that company's email server.
– Peter M
yesterday
5
Some small companies may have an "About our employees" page with profiles that may include likes to employees' personal web sites. I would regard a personal web site link within an email as appropriate in such cases, but would expect that the individual refrain from putting anything on the web site that might reflect negatively on the employer. That may mean having a "formal" personal web site separate from a less-formal one which is not linked from the employer.
– supercat
yesterday
1
Also consider the liability aspect from the company's point of view. They can't control the content of your personal website, so they won't want even the appearance that it's connected to the business in any way. If a client clicks on that link and goes to your site, which was hacked and is now serving up viruses, they'll be quite upset with your company.
– bta
yesterday
add a comment |
No, you don't get to do your self-promotion via a work-email, unless the link points to an official source provided / hosted by the organization you work for.
Since I use my work email to communicate with many clients and maybe potential future employers [...]
Stop doing that immediately if the purpose is to seek / influence/ communicate from the viewpoint of "potential future employers". As per law in most of the cases, you're supposed to use company provided resources (yes, your email is one of them) for official work purposes, and searching for another job is not "official" work (i.e., you don't get paid for that).
Existing client or not, for getting in touch with potential employers, use your personal email address.
Client communication is just fine as long as it is limited to working communication / collaboration.
11
Additional point is that the employer should have the ability to read anything you send/receive via that company's email server.
– Peter M
yesterday
5
Some small companies may have an "About our employees" page with profiles that may include likes to employees' personal web sites. I would regard a personal web site link within an email as appropriate in such cases, but would expect that the individual refrain from putting anything on the web site that might reflect negatively on the employer. That may mean having a "formal" personal web site separate from a less-formal one which is not linked from the employer.
– supercat
yesterday
1
Also consider the liability aspect from the company's point of view. They can't control the content of your personal website, so they won't want even the appearance that it's connected to the business in any way. If a client clicks on that link and goes to your site, which was hacked and is now serving up viruses, they'll be quite upset with your company.
– bta
yesterday
add a comment |
No, you don't get to do your self-promotion via a work-email, unless the link points to an official source provided / hosted by the organization you work for.
Since I use my work email to communicate with many clients and maybe potential future employers [...]
Stop doing that immediately if the purpose is to seek / influence/ communicate from the viewpoint of "potential future employers". As per law in most of the cases, you're supposed to use company provided resources (yes, your email is one of them) for official work purposes, and searching for another job is not "official" work (i.e., you don't get paid for that).
Existing client or not, for getting in touch with potential employers, use your personal email address.
Client communication is just fine as long as it is limited to working communication / collaboration.
No, you don't get to do your self-promotion via a work-email, unless the link points to an official source provided / hosted by the organization you work for.
Since I use my work email to communicate with many clients and maybe potential future employers [...]
Stop doing that immediately if the purpose is to seek / influence/ communicate from the viewpoint of "potential future employers". As per law in most of the cases, you're supposed to use company provided resources (yes, your email is one of them) for official work purposes, and searching for another job is not "official" work (i.e., you don't get paid for that).
Existing client or not, for getting in touch with potential employers, use your personal email address.
Client communication is just fine as long as it is limited to working communication / collaboration.
edited yesterday
Kat
2,75221218
2,75221218
answered yesterday
Sourav GhoshSourav Ghosh
1,493818
1,493818
11
Additional point is that the employer should have the ability to read anything you send/receive via that company's email server.
– Peter M
yesterday
5
Some small companies may have an "About our employees" page with profiles that may include likes to employees' personal web sites. I would regard a personal web site link within an email as appropriate in such cases, but would expect that the individual refrain from putting anything on the web site that might reflect negatively on the employer. That may mean having a "formal" personal web site separate from a less-formal one which is not linked from the employer.
– supercat
yesterday
1
Also consider the liability aspect from the company's point of view. They can't control the content of your personal website, so they won't want even the appearance that it's connected to the business in any way. If a client clicks on that link and goes to your site, which was hacked and is now serving up viruses, they'll be quite upset with your company.
– bta
yesterday
add a comment |
11
Additional point is that the employer should have the ability to read anything you send/receive via that company's email server.
– Peter M
yesterday
5
Some small companies may have an "About our employees" page with profiles that may include likes to employees' personal web sites. I would regard a personal web site link within an email as appropriate in such cases, but would expect that the individual refrain from putting anything on the web site that might reflect negatively on the employer. That may mean having a "formal" personal web site separate from a less-formal one which is not linked from the employer.
– supercat
yesterday
1
Also consider the liability aspect from the company's point of view. They can't control the content of your personal website, so they won't want even the appearance that it's connected to the business in any way. If a client clicks on that link and goes to your site, which was hacked and is now serving up viruses, they'll be quite upset with your company.
– bta
yesterday
11
11
Additional point is that the employer should have the ability to read anything you send/receive via that company's email server.
– Peter M
yesterday
Additional point is that the employer should have the ability to read anything you send/receive via that company's email server.
– Peter M
yesterday
5
5
Some small companies may have an "About our employees" page with profiles that may include likes to employees' personal web sites. I would regard a personal web site link within an email as appropriate in such cases, but would expect that the individual refrain from putting anything on the web site that might reflect negatively on the employer. That may mean having a "formal" personal web site separate from a less-formal one which is not linked from the employer.
– supercat
yesterday
Some small companies may have an "About our employees" page with profiles that may include likes to employees' personal web sites. I would regard a personal web site link within an email as appropriate in such cases, but would expect that the individual refrain from putting anything on the web site that might reflect negatively on the employer. That may mean having a "formal" personal web site separate from a less-formal one which is not linked from the employer.
– supercat
yesterday
1
1
Also consider the liability aspect from the company's point of view. They can't control the content of your personal website, so they won't want even the appearance that it's connected to the business in any way. If a client clicks on that link and goes to your site, which was hacked and is now serving up viruses, they'll be quite upset with your company.
– bta
yesterday
Also consider the liability aspect from the company's point of view. They can't control the content of your personal website, so they won't want even the appearance that it's connected to the business in any way. If a client clicks on that link and goes to your site, which was hacked and is now serving up viruses, they'll be quite upset with your company.
– bta
yesterday
add a comment |
Definitely not, using work resources for personal promotion is not a good idea.
But there's nothing wrong with including a link to your personal site on your LinkedIn profile.
While it is common, but usually not encouraged to add any off-site links , including linkedin, to your business email signature. Most organizations have a policy on creating and using signatures, and I've never come across any which allows linkedin explicitly. Just saying.
– Sourav Ghosh
yesterday
Absolutely, I have done so via LinkedIn already. I know am sure it is a bad idea. thank you. (at my company almost all employees with LinkedIn include them in their signatures, including management)
– user91949
yesterday
1
@throwaway Dont do it just because everyone else does. Be sure about the policy. If there isn't one, ask the HR or your manager for guidance (preferably written).
– Sourav Ghosh
yesterday
2
Your right, I apologize for this sort of mentality. your are right in the concept of "just because everyone else is". But my company is small enough that they don't really have policies one way or the other. Both my manager and the HR staff do it as well, which I understand doesn't automatically give me the clearance to do so
– user91949
yesterday
add a comment |
Definitely not, using work resources for personal promotion is not a good idea.
But there's nothing wrong with including a link to your personal site on your LinkedIn profile.
While it is common, but usually not encouraged to add any off-site links , including linkedin, to your business email signature. Most organizations have a policy on creating and using signatures, and I've never come across any which allows linkedin explicitly. Just saying.
– Sourav Ghosh
yesterday
Absolutely, I have done so via LinkedIn already. I know am sure it is a bad idea. thank you. (at my company almost all employees with LinkedIn include them in their signatures, including management)
– user91949
yesterday
1
@throwaway Dont do it just because everyone else does. Be sure about the policy. If there isn't one, ask the HR or your manager for guidance (preferably written).
– Sourav Ghosh
yesterday
2
Your right, I apologize for this sort of mentality. your are right in the concept of "just because everyone else is". But my company is small enough that they don't really have policies one way or the other. Both my manager and the HR staff do it as well, which I understand doesn't automatically give me the clearance to do so
– user91949
yesterday
add a comment |
Definitely not, using work resources for personal promotion is not a good idea.
But there's nothing wrong with including a link to your personal site on your LinkedIn profile.
Definitely not, using work resources for personal promotion is not a good idea.
But there's nothing wrong with including a link to your personal site on your LinkedIn profile.
answered yesterday
SteveSteve
5,75151733
5,75151733
While it is common, but usually not encouraged to add any off-site links , including linkedin, to your business email signature. Most organizations have a policy on creating and using signatures, and I've never come across any which allows linkedin explicitly. Just saying.
– Sourav Ghosh
yesterday
Absolutely, I have done so via LinkedIn already. I know am sure it is a bad idea. thank you. (at my company almost all employees with LinkedIn include them in their signatures, including management)
– user91949
yesterday
1
@throwaway Dont do it just because everyone else does. Be sure about the policy. If there isn't one, ask the HR or your manager for guidance (preferably written).
– Sourav Ghosh
yesterday
2
Your right, I apologize for this sort of mentality. your are right in the concept of "just because everyone else is". But my company is small enough that they don't really have policies one way or the other. Both my manager and the HR staff do it as well, which I understand doesn't automatically give me the clearance to do so
– user91949
yesterday
add a comment |
While it is common, but usually not encouraged to add any off-site links , including linkedin, to your business email signature. Most organizations have a policy on creating and using signatures, and I've never come across any which allows linkedin explicitly. Just saying.
– Sourav Ghosh
yesterday
Absolutely, I have done so via LinkedIn already. I know am sure it is a bad idea. thank you. (at my company almost all employees with LinkedIn include them in their signatures, including management)
– user91949
yesterday
1
@throwaway Dont do it just because everyone else does. Be sure about the policy. If there isn't one, ask the HR or your manager for guidance (preferably written).
– Sourav Ghosh
yesterday
2
Your right, I apologize for this sort of mentality. your are right in the concept of "just because everyone else is". But my company is small enough that they don't really have policies one way or the other. Both my manager and the HR staff do it as well, which I understand doesn't automatically give me the clearance to do so
– user91949
yesterday
While it is common, but usually not encouraged to add any off-site links , including linkedin, to your business email signature. Most organizations have a policy on creating and using signatures, and I've never come across any which allows linkedin explicitly. Just saying.
– Sourav Ghosh
yesterday
While it is common, but usually not encouraged to add any off-site links , including linkedin, to your business email signature. Most organizations have a policy on creating and using signatures, and I've never come across any which allows linkedin explicitly. Just saying.
– Sourav Ghosh
yesterday
Absolutely, I have done so via LinkedIn already. I know am sure it is a bad idea. thank you. (at my company almost all employees with LinkedIn include them in their signatures, including management)
– user91949
yesterday
Absolutely, I have done so via LinkedIn already. I know am sure it is a bad idea. thank you. (at my company almost all employees with LinkedIn include them in their signatures, including management)
– user91949
yesterday
1
1
@throwaway Dont do it just because everyone else does. Be sure about the policy. If there isn't one, ask the HR or your manager for guidance (preferably written).
– Sourav Ghosh
yesterday
@throwaway Dont do it just because everyone else does. Be sure about the policy. If there isn't one, ask the HR or your manager for guidance (preferably written).
– Sourav Ghosh
yesterday
2
2
Your right, I apologize for this sort of mentality. your are right in the concept of "just because everyone else is". But my company is small enough that they don't really have policies one way or the other. Both my manager and the HR staff do it as well, which I understand doesn't automatically give me the clearance to do so
– user91949
yesterday
Your right, I apologize for this sort of mentality. your are right in the concept of "just because everyone else is". But my company is small enough that they don't really have policies one way or the other. Both my manager and the HR staff do it as well, which I understand doesn't automatically give me the clearance to do so
– user91949
yesterday
add a comment |
Many companies have policies or guidelines regarding email signature blocks. So start there.
I would expect that even one without guidelines would not like employees to include a link to a site not related to their company or your project.
Since I use my work email to communicate with many clients and maybe
potential future employers, I would like to put a link to this website
in my email signature for work.
Don't try and talk to future employers with a email address of your current employer. They don't like that. You also don't want to lose your only way of communicating with future employers on your last day of work.
Right, all good points. I wasn't thinking to actually do job offer related communications via that email, it was more, provide alternate ways of contacting. This is why I checked before doing. Thank you
– user91949
yesterday
add a comment |
Many companies have policies or guidelines regarding email signature blocks. So start there.
I would expect that even one without guidelines would not like employees to include a link to a site not related to their company or your project.
Since I use my work email to communicate with many clients and maybe
potential future employers, I would like to put a link to this website
in my email signature for work.
Don't try and talk to future employers with a email address of your current employer. They don't like that. You also don't want to lose your only way of communicating with future employers on your last day of work.
Right, all good points. I wasn't thinking to actually do job offer related communications via that email, it was more, provide alternate ways of contacting. This is why I checked before doing. Thank you
– user91949
yesterday
add a comment |
Many companies have policies or guidelines regarding email signature blocks. So start there.
I would expect that even one without guidelines would not like employees to include a link to a site not related to their company or your project.
Since I use my work email to communicate with many clients and maybe
potential future employers, I would like to put a link to this website
in my email signature for work.
Don't try and talk to future employers with a email address of your current employer. They don't like that. You also don't want to lose your only way of communicating with future employers on your last day of work.
Many companies have policies or guidelines regarding email signature blocks. So start there.
I would expect that even one without guidelines would not like employees to include a link to a site not related to their company or your project.
Since I use my work email to communicate with many clients and maybe
potential future employers, I would like to put a link to this website
in my email signature for work.
Don't try and talk to future employers with a email address of your current employer. They don't like that. You also don't want to lose your only way of communicating with future employers on your last day of work.
answered yesterday
mhoran_psprepmhoran_psprep
44.6k669158
44.6k669158
Right, all good points. I wasn't thinking to actually do job offer related communications via that email, it was more, provide alternate ways of contacting. This is why I checked before doing. Thank you
– user91949
yesterday
add a comment |
Right, all good points. I wasn't thinking to actually do job offer related communications via that email, it was more, provide alternate ways of contacting. This is why I checked before doing. Thank you
– user91949
yesterday
Right, all good points. I wasn't thinking to actually do job offer related communications via that email, it was more, provide alternate ways of contacting. This is why I checked before doing. Thank you
– user91949
yesterday
Right, all good points. I wasn't thinking to actually do job offer related communications via that email, it was more, provide alternate ways of contacting. This is why I checked before doing. Thank you
– user91949
yesterday
add a comment |
This is a decent idea if you own your own company and the email address.
If you're not a business owner and you work for someone else, this is not the best idea.
add a comment |
This is a decent idea if you own your own company and the email address.
If you're not a business owner and you work for someone else, this is not the best idea.
add a comment |
This is a decent idea if you own your own company and the email address.
If you're not a business owner and you work for someone else, this is not the best idea.
This is a decent idea if you own your own company and the email address.
If you're not a business owner and you work for someone else, this is not the best idea.
answered yesterday
SteveSteve
2,417517
2,417517
add a comment |
add a comment |
There is one exception to firm no provided by Sourav Ghosh.
If, and only if you work not as employee, but as an one-person company on B2B (business to business) agreement with your "employer" you may be allowed, or even required by law*, to disclose it. And link to your business website may be acceptable way to do it.
Always consult your contact in your "employer" company before doing it. They may have specific rules or guidelines about it.
* I am not a lawyer. If you don't know how it is for you, in your jurisdiction, you need a lawyer.
3
Nah, I am a regular employee. So I shall not be doing this, thank you for the response
– user91949
yesterday
add a comment |
There is one exception to firm no provided by Sourav Ghosh.
If, and only if you work not as employee, but as an one-person company on B2B (business to business) agreement with your "employer" you may be allowed, or even required by law*, to disclose it. And link to your business website may be acceptable way to do it.
Always consult your contact in your "employer" company before doing it. They may have specific rules or guidelines about it.
* I am not a lawyer. If you don't know how it is for you, in your jurisdiction, you need a lawyer.
3
Nah, I am a regular employee. So I shall not be doing this, thank you for the response
– user91949
yesterday
add a comment |
There is one exception to firm no provided by Sourav Ghosh.
If, and only if you work not as employee, but as an one-person company on B2B (business to business) agreement with your "employer" you may be allowed, or even required by law*, to disclose it. And link to your business website may be acceptable way to do it.
Always consult your contact in your "employer" company before doing it. They may have specific rules or guidelines about it.
* I am not a lawyer. If you don't know how it is for you, in your jurisdiction, you need a lawyer.
There is one exception to firm no provided by Sourav Ghosh.
If, and only if you work not as employee, but as an one-person company on B2B (business to business) agreement with your "employer" you may be allowed, or even required by law*, to disclose it. And link to your business website may be acceptable way to do it.
Always consult your contact in your "employer" company before doing it. They may have specific rules or guidelines about it.
* I am not a lawyer. If you don't know how it is for you, in your jurisdiction, you need a lawyer.
answered yesterday
MołotMołot
1,2551817
1,2551817
3
Nah, I am a regular employee. So I shall not be doing this, thank you for the response
– user91949
yesterday
add a comment |
3
Nah, I am a regular employee. So I shall not be doing this, thank you for the response
– user91949
yesterday
3
3
Nah, I am a regular employee. So I shall not be doing this, thank you for the response
– user91949
yesterday
Nah, I am a regular employee. So I shall not be doing this, thank you for the response
– user91949
yesterday
add a comment |
No. As an employer, the last thing I want to see is someone's personal website. This indicates 'side projects,' which we all know are important and practical, but suggests (right or wrong) that the person is working on it during office hours.
I'm not a stickler, and hope everyone has a healthy work-life balance including keeping personal tabs during office hours, but don't put it on your office signature going out to my internal and external contacts. Stop immediately is my advice to you as a member of an organization that is growing and supported by you.
2
I haven't even begun to do so,this is why I asked before doing so. Thanks
– user91949
yesterday
@throwaway - Excellent. When you become social with your coworkers and other agency folks, even sharing Facebook for fun or whatever, then of course have a healthy relationship of sharing your personal projects with them; but not on your official e-mail nor on your business cards, etc. I wouldn't even include a LinkedIn on your e-mail. If people want to find you, they can or you can tell them personally.
– Mikey
yesterday
add a comment |
No. As an employer, the last thing I want to see is someone's personal website. This indicates 'side projects,' which we all know are important and practical, but suggests (right or wrong) that the person is working on it during office hours.
I'm not a stickler, and hope everyone has a healthy work-life balance including keeping personal tabs during office hours, but don't put it on your office signature going out to my internal and external contacts. Stop immediately is my advice to you as a member of an organization that is growing and supported by you.
2
I haven't even begun to do so,this is why I asked before doing so. Thanks
– user91949
yesterday
@throwaway - Excellent. When you become social with your coworkers and other agency folks, even sharing Facebook for fun or whatever, then of course have a healthy relationship of sharing your personal projects with them; but not on your official e-mail nor on your business cards, etc. I wouldn't even include a LinkedIn on your e-mail. If people want to find you, they can or you can tell them personally.
– Mikey
yesterday
add a comment |
No. As an employer, the last thing I want to see is someone's personal website. This indicates 'side projects,' which we all know are important and practical, but suggests (right or wrong) that the person is working on it during office hours.
I'm not a stickler, and hope everyone has a healthy work-life balance including keeping personal tabs during office hours, but don't put it on your office signature going out to my internal and external contacts. Stop immediately is my advice to you as a member of an organization that is growing and supported by you.
No. As an employer, the last thing I want to see is someone's personal website. This indicates 'side projects,' which we all know are important and practical, but suggests (right or wrong) that the person is working on it during office hours.
I'm not a stickler, and hope everyone has a healthy work-life balance including keeping personal tabs during office hours, but don't put it on your office signature going out to my internal and external contacts. Stop immediately is my advice to you as a member of an organization that is growing and supported by you.
answered yesterday
MikeyMikey
587310
587310
2
I haven't even begun to do so,this is why I asked before doing so. Thanks
– user91949
yesterday
@throwaway - Excellent. When you become social with your coworkers and other agency folks, even sharing Facebook for fun or whatever, then of course have a healthy relationship of sharing your personal projects with them; but not on your official e-mail nor on your business cards, etc. I wouldn't even include a LinkedIn on your e-mail. If people want to find you, they can or you can tell them personally.
– Mikey
yesterday
add a comment |
2
I haven't even begun to do so,this is why I asked before doing so. Thanks
– user91949
yesterday
@throwaway - Excellent. When you become social with your coworkers and other agency folks, even sharing Facebook for fun or whatever, then of course have a healthy relationship of sharing your personal projects with them; but not on your official e-mail nor on your business cards, etc. I wouldn't even include a LinkedIn on your e-mail. If people want to find you, they can or you can tell them personally.
– Mikey
yesterday
2
2
I haven't even begun to do so,this is why I asked before doing so. Thanks
– user91949
yesterday
I haven't even begun to do so,this is why I asked before doing so. Thanks
– user91949
yesterday
@throwaway - Excellent. When you become social with your coworkers and other agency folks, even sharing Facebook for fun or whatever, then of course have a healthy relationship of sharing your personal projects with them; but not on your official e-mail nor on your business cards, etc. I wouldn't even include a LinkedIn on your e-mail. If people want to find you, they can or you can tell them personally.
– Mikey
yesterday
@throwaway - Excellent. When you become social with your coworkers and other agency folks, even sharing Facebook for fun or whatever, then of course have a healthy relationship of sharing your personal projects with them; but not on your official e-mail nor on your business cards, etc. I wouldn't even include a LinkedIn on your e-mail. If people want to find you, they can or you can tell them personally.
– Mikey
yesterday
add a comment |
I think it depends. Most of the time you shouldn't do that. Of course, if you do that, you need some kind of approval from your immediate boss (and you clearly need to separate professional matters from others). Don't do that without such an approval. Never divulge something on the Web that your employer would be unhappy of.
I am doing that all the time (with some informal approval from my boss), so this is another exception (to the accepted answer). And so are most of my colleagues, and sometimes my direct boss and my N+2 boss.
The reason is simple, but highly specific. My employer organization (the DoE equivalent in France, CEA) is somehow a research, French state owned, organization (but also the institution making nuclear warheads for the French state). For burocratic "soviet-like" reasons I won't explain in details here (but which are public and available in some Court des Comptes report written in French), we practically are not allowed to have any professional web page within CEA, that is under the .cea.fr TLD. But we all (and that includes my colleagues, my boss, my boss' boss) have some more of less "professional" web pages "somewhere" else. And we practically use them, e.g. to find H2020 research partners, to put preprint of reports, etc.
In practice, getting a web site inside CEA visible from outside is so bureaucratic (requiring dozens of internal meetings) that most of CEA web pages are obsolete, scientifically speaking. Practically speaking, there is more grey knowledge (from CEA employees, with approval from their boss) outside of .cea.fr than inside it.
But we (research engineers at CEA, LIST) nearly all have a web page somewhere, and when I did found (and that happened more than once) some H2020 research partners with my personal web page, both my boss and his own boss congratulated me.
But CEA is a special case. I hope (and I know) that most other similar government-owned research institutions in other countries are more flexible.
This is a (shameful) peculiarity of France. As a country we both love and hate bureaucracy. Why is it so it outside of my expertise. French President E.Macron nominated (with the approval of Prime minister E.Philippe) at the head of CEA François Jacq with the explicit mission to reduce that bureaucracy (inside CEA).
PS. Right now (in start of 2019), I (and my work on bismon) am funded with both the DECODER and the CHARIOT H2020 projects. And in both cases, I did found H2020 partners using a few sentences on my personal web pages, and my boss knows that, and was happy of that.
add a comment |
I think it depends. Most of the time you shouldn't do that. Of course, if you do that, you need some kind of approval from your immediate boss (and you clearly need to separate professional matters from others). Don't do that without such an approval. Never divulge something on the Web that your employer would be unhappy of.
I am doing that all the time (with some informal approval from my boss), so this is another exception (to the accepted answer). And so are most of my colleagues, and sometimes my direct boss and my N+2 boss.
The reason is simple, but highly specific. My employer organization (the DoE equivalent in France, CEA) is somehow a research, French state owned, organization (but also the institution making nuclear warheads for the French state). For burocratic "soviet-like" reasons I won't explain in details here (but which are public and available in some Court des Comptes report written in French), we practically are not allowed to have any professional web page within CEA, that is under the .cea.fr TLD. But we all (and that includes my colleagues, my boss, my boss' boss) have some more of less "professional" web pages "somewhere" else. And we practically use them, e.g. to find H2020 research partners, to put preprint of reports, etc.
In practice, getting a web site inside CEA visible from outside is so bureaucratic (requiring dozens of internal meetings) that most of CEA web pages are obsolete, scientifically speaking. Practically speaking, there is more grey knowledge (from CEA employees, with approval from their boss) outside of .cea.fr than inside it.
But we (research engineers at CEA, LIST) nearly all have a web page somewhere, and when I did found (and that happened more than once) some H2020 research partners with my personal web page, both my boss and his own boss congratulated me.
But CEA is a special case. I hope (and I know) that most other similar government-owned research institutions in other countries are more flexible.
This is a (shameful) peculiarity of France. As a country we both love and hate bureaucracy. Why is it so it outside of my expertise. French President E.Macron nominated (with the approval of Prime minister E.Philippe) at the head of CEA François Jacq with the explicit mission to reduce that bureaucracy (inside CEA).
PS. Right now (in start of 2019), I (and my work on bismon) am funded with both the DECODER and the CHARIOT H2020 projects. And in both cases, I did found H2020 partners using a few sentences on my personal web pages, and my boss knows that, and was happy of that.
add a comment |
I think it depends. Most of the time you shouldn't do that. Of course, if you do that, you need some kind of approval from your immediate boss (and you clearly need to separate professional matters from others). Don't do that without such an approval. Never divulge something on the Web that your employer would be unhappy of.
I am doing that all the time (with some informal approval from my boss), so this is another exception (to the accepted answer). And so are most of my colleagues, and sometimes my direct boss and my N+2 boss.
The reason is simple, but highly specific. My employer organization (the DoE equivalent in France, CEA) is somehow a research, French state owned, organization (but also the institution making nuclear warheads for the French state). For burocratic "soviet-like" reasons I won't explain in details here (but which are public and available in some Court des Comptes report written in French), we practically are not allowed to have any professional web page within CEA, that is under the .cea.fr TLD. But we all (and that includes my colleagues, my boss, my boss' boss) have some more of less "professional" web pages "somewhere" else. And we practically use them, e.g. to find H2020 research partners, to put preprint of reports, etc.
In practice, getting a web site inside CEA visible from outside is so bureaucratic (requiring dozens of internal meetings) that most of CEA web pages are obsolete, scientifically speaking. Practically speaking, there is more grey knowledge (from CEA employees, with approval from their boss) outside of .cea.fr than inside it.
But we (research engineers at CEA, LIST) nearly all have a web page somewhere, and when I did found (and that happened more than once) some H2020 research partners with my personal web page, both my boss and his own boss congratulated me.
But CEA is a special case. I hope (and I know) that most other similar government-owned research institutions in other countries are more flexible.
This is a (shameful) peculiarity of France. As a country we both love and hate bureaucracy. Why is it so it outside of my expertise. French President E.Macron nominated (with the approval of Prime minister E.Philippe) at the head of CEA François Jacq with the explicit mission to reduce that bureaucracy (inside CEA).
PS. Right now (in start of 2019), I (and my work on bismon) am funded with both the DECODER and the CHARIOT H2020 projects. And in both cases, I did found H2020 partners using a few sentences on my personal web pages, and my boss knows that, and was happy of that.
I think it depends. Most of the time you shouldn't do that. Of course, if you do that, you need some kind of approval from your immediate boss (and you clearly need to separate professional matters from others). Don't do that without such an approval. Never divulge something on the Web that your employer would be unhappy of.
I am doing that all the time (with some informal approval from my boss), so this is another exception (to the accepted answer). And so are most of my colleagues, and sometimes my direct boss and my N+2 boss.
The reason is simple, but highly specific. My employer organization (the DoE equivalent in France, CEA) is somehow a research, French state owned, organization (but also the institution making nuclear warheads for the French state). For burocratic "soviet-like" reasons I won't explain in details here (but which are public and available in some Court des Comptes report written in French), we practically are not allowed to have any professional web page within CEA, that is under the .cea.fr TLD. But we all (and that includes my colleagues, my boss, my boss' boss) have some more of less "professional" web pages "somewhere" else. And we practically use them, e.g. to find H2020 research partners, to put preprint of reports, etc.
In practice, getting a web site inside CEA visible from outside is so bureaucratic (requiring dozens of internal meetings) that most of CEA web pages are obsolete, scientifically speaking. Practically speaking, there is more grey knowledge (from CEA employees, with approval from their boss) outside of .cea.fr than inside it.
But we (research engineers at CEA, LIST) nearly all have a web page somewhere, and when I did found (and that happened more than once) some H2020 research partners with my personal web page, both my boss and his own boss congratulated me.
But CEA is a special case. I hope (and I know) that most other similar government-owned research institutions in other countries are more flexible.
This is a (shameful) peculiarity of France. As a country we both love and hate bureaucracy. Why is it so it outside of my expertise. French President E.Macron nominated (with the approval of Prime minister E.Philippe) at the head of CEA François Jacq with the explicit mission to reduce that bureaucracy (inside CEA).
PS. Right now (in start of 2019), I (and my work on bismon) am funded with both the DECODER and the CHARIOT H2020 projects. And in both cases, I did found H2020 partners using a few sentences on my personal web pages, and my boss knows that, and was happy of that.
edited 16 hours ago
answered 16 hours ago
Basile StarynkevitchBasile Starynkevitch
50938
50938
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to The Workplace Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworkplace.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f127877%2fcan-i-put-the-link-to-my-personal-website-in-my-work-email-signature%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
21
No need to apologise in your topic. Some things might be more obvious to some, not to others. You had a gut feeling that it might be weird, researched it and came to an conclusion. sic vita est. A lot better than ignoring that feeling
– Martijn
yesterday
1
@RichardU yes, I am now aware that this was a horrible idea and will not be doing so. my apologies
– user91949
yesterday
2
I can't comment on how good an idea this is in US culture (and I make it a point to strictly separate email address usage), but in the European environment I've very often seen colleagues put their LinkedIn profiles in their corporate email signatures. (As to the rest of the question, yeah, don't do that.)
– Christoph Burschka
yesterday
9
@throwaway we all have bad ideas, you were smart enough to realize yours, which makes you smarter than most of us.
– Richard U
yesterday
5
It is incorrect to vote to close this as opinion based.
– Fattie
yesterday