I poured simple syrup over cooked apples. Why did it turn watery?
I boiled apples in water until tender. I took apples out, then added lemon and sugar to water in pot and boiled it. When I poured it over the apples it made a nice thickened gel. By morning it's all watery. Why?
syrup
New contributor
add a comment |
I boiled apples in water until tender. I took apples out, then added lemon and sugar to water in pot and boiled it. When I poured it over the apples it made a nice thickened gel. By morning it's all watery. Why?
syrup
New contributor
add a comment |
I boiled apples in water until tender. I took apples out, then added lemon and sugar to water in pot and boiled it. When I poured it over the apples it made a nice thickened gel. By morning it's all watery. Why?
syrup
New contributor
I boiled apples in water until tender. I took apples out, then added lemon and sugar to water in pot and boiled it. When I poured it over the apples it made a nice thickened gel. By morning it's all watery. Why?
syrup
syrup
New contributor
New contributor
New contributor
asked Dec 27 at 15:41
Patricia Hoff
7113
7113
New contributor
New contributor
add a comment |
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
Some of the water content of the apples has migrated from the apples to the surrounding syrup.
This is due to an effect called osmosis. The apple, like all living things is made out of cells that have (among other things) water inside them. The cell walls are semipermeable, meaning small molecules like water can pass through them, but larger molecules like sugars cannot.
All dissolved substances (sugars, salt, etc.) attract water to themselves, so if you expose the apples to a highly sugary solution (like syrup), the water will be pulled from the apples into the syrup.
New contributor
I think it unlikely that the apple cell walls are intact after boiling. You don't need to invoke osmosis to explain the water migration - simple diffusion is enough.
– user20637
23 hours ago
@user20637 minor nitpick, it's the cellmembranes, not cell walls that prevent diffusion. Nevertheless, those are probably also toast after boiling.
– JAD
23 hours ago
@JAD Hat-tip for the accurate nitpick. I think you agree it's not osmosis. I wouldn't be surprised if syneresis also made a contribution- so water would migrate from boiled apples even in the absence of sugar syrup - but I'm not sure.
– user20637
22 hours ago
add a comment |
The syrup has very high sugar content and the apples much lower. The syrup pulls water out of the apples by a process known as osmosis, which tries to equalize the sugar concentration on each side of the permeable membranes of the apples' cells.
1
The other answer clearly had the right idea, but is wrong in both the word choice and the way it is described. It is still more descriptive than this answer. If someone knows what osmosis is, they understand that is what he was going for. If they don't, your answer doesn't help them understand what is going on. (Note that I did upvote because you are right.)
– KMB
2 days ago
@KMB I added a bit more detail.
– David Richerby
2 days ago
2
I upvoted because this is clearly the best answer, but "The syrup pulls water out of the apples" is a bit misleading, because the syrup isn't doing anything. As you mention, it's basically just that the system is tending towards uniformity/homogeneity. It's basically statistical mechanics.
– Faheem Mitha
2 days ago
add a comment |
Sugar is hydrophilic, meaning it's attracted to water. Your water soaked/softened apples likely had a higher moisture content compared to your syrup. The water migrated out of the apples and equalized the sugar concentration. This process is referred to as osmosis.
Next time, try boiling the apples in that sugar syrup instead of just water.
9
@briantist Actually, the explanation is almost entirely wrong. First, "hygroscopic" refers to substances that absorb water vapour from the air, which isn't likely to be what's happening and which contradicts the rest of the answer. Second, it's not sugar moving from the syrup into the apples, but water moving from the apples into the syrup.
– David Richerby
2 days ago
5
This is the issue with the upvote system and the HNQ. An answer with a fancy word which looks plausible at first glance gets many upvotes, even when it makes no sense
– Tim
2 days ago
3
@Tim On the other hand, HNQ was the only reason I found this.
– David Richerby
2 days ago
2
The part about boiling the apples in the syrup next time is exactly right.
– JPmiaou
2 days ago
1
@DavidRicherby I suggested that edit around the time of your comment. It sat in the edit queue for too long. This is what i thought was the intent of his answer. He, for instance, thought the word for hydrophilic was hydroscopic which is a very common mistake (hygroscopic was a correction by someone else).
– KMB
yesterday
|
show 4 more comments
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "49"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Patricia Hoff is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcooking.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f95172%2fi-poured-simple-syrup-over-cooked-apples-why-did-it-turn-watery%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Some of the water content of the apples has migrated from the apples to the surrounding syrup.
This is due to an effect called osmosis. The apple, like all living things is made out of cells that have (among other things) water inside them. The cell walls are semipermeable, meaning small molecules like water can pass through them, but larger molecules like sugars cannot.
All dissolved substances (sugars, salt, etc.) attract water to themselves, so if you expose the apples to a highly sugary solution (like syrup), the water will be pulled from the apples into the syrup.
New contributor
I think it unlikely that the apple cell walls are intact after boiling. You don't need to invoke osmosis to explain the water migration - simple diffusion is enough.
– user20637
23 hours ago
@user20637 minor nitpick, it's the cellmembranes, not cell walls that prevent diffusion. Nevertheless, those are probably also toast after boiling.
– JAD
23 hours ago
@JAD Hat-tip for the accurate nitpick. I think you agree it's not osmosis. I wouldn't be surprised if syneresis also made a contribution- so water would migrate from boiled apples even in the absence of sugar syrup - but I'm not sure.
– user20637
22 hours ago
add a comment |
Some of the water content of the apples has migrated from the apples to the surrounding syrup.
This is due to an effect called osmosis. The apple, like all living things is made out of cells that have (among other things) water inside them. The cell walls are semipermeable, meaning small molecules like water can pass through them, but larger molecules like sugars cannot.
All dissolved substances (sugars, salt, etc.) attract water to themselves, so if you expose the apples to a highly sugary solution (like syrup), the water will be pulled from the apples into the syrup.
New contributor
I think it unlikely that the apple cell walls are intact after boiling. You don't need to invoke osmosis to explain the water migration - simple diffusion is enough.
– user20637
23 hours ago
@user20637 minor nitpick, it's the cellmembranes, not cell walls that prevent diffusion. Nevertheless, those are probably also toast after boiling.
– JAD
23 hours ago
@JAD Hat-tip for the accurate nitpick. I think you agree it's not osmosis. I wouldn't be surprised if syneresis also made a contribution- so water would migrate from boiled apples even in the absence of sugar syrup - but I'm not sure.
– user20637
22 hours ago
add a comment |
Some of the water content of the apples has migrated from the apples to the surrounding syrup.
This is due to an effect called osmosis. The apple, like all living things is made out of cells that have (among other things) water inside them. The cell walls are semipermeable, meaning small molecules like water can pass through them, but larger molecules like sugars cannot.
All dissolved substances (sugars, salt, etc.) attract water to themselves, so if you expose the apples to a highly sugary solution (like syrup), the water will be pulled from the apples into the syrup.
New contributor
Some of the water content of the apples has migrated from the apples to the surrounding syrup.
This is due to an effect called osmosis. The apple, like all living things is made out of cells that have (among other things) water inside them. The cell walls are semipermeable, meaning small molecules like water can pass through them, but larger molecules like sugars cannot.
All dissolved substances (sugars, salt, etc.) attract water to themselves, so if you expose the apples to a highly sugary solution (like syrup), the water will be pulled from the apples into the syrup.
New contributor
New contributor
answered 2 days ago
uLoop
42114
42114
New contributor
New contributor
I think it unlikely that the apple cell walls are intact after boiling. You don't need to invoke osmosis to explain the water migration - simple diffusion is enough.
– user20637
23 hours ago
@user20637 minor nitpick, it's the cellmembranes, not cell walls that prevent diffusion. Nevertheless, those are probably also toast after boiling.
– JAD
23 hours ago
@JAD Hat-tip for the accurate nitpick. I think you agree it's not osmosis. I wouldn't be surprised if syneresis also made a contribution- so water would migrate from boiled apples even in the absence of sugar syrup - but I'm not sure.
– user20637
22 hours ago
add a comment |
I think it unlikely that the apple cell walls are intact after boiling. You don't need to invoke osmosis to explain the water migration - simple diffusion is enough.
– user20637
23 hours ago
@user20637 minor nitpick, it's the cellmembranes, not cell walls that prevent diffusion. Nevertheless, those are probably also toast after boiling.
– JAD
23 hours ago
@JAD Hat-tip for the accurate nitpick. I think you agree it's not osmosis. I wouldn't be surprised if syneresis also made a contribution- so water would migrate from boiled apples even in the absence of sugar syrup - but I'm not sure.
– user20637
22 hours ago
I think it unlikely that the apple cell walls are intact after boiling. You don't need to invoke osmosis to explain the water migration - simple diffusion is enough.
– user20637
23 hours ago
I think it unlikely that the apple cell walls are intact after boiling. You don't need to invoke osmosis to explain the water migration - simple diffusion is enough.
– user20637
23 hours ago
@user20637 minor nitpick, it's the cellmembranes, not cell walls that prevent diffusion. Nevertheless, those are probably also toast after boiling.
– JAD
23 hours ago
@user20637 minor nitpick, it's the cellmembranes, not cell walls that prevent diffusion. Nevertheless, those are probably also toast after boiling.
– JAD
23 hours ago
@JAD Hat-tip for the accurate nitpick. I think you agree it's not osmosis. I wouldn't be surprised if syneresis also made a contribution- so water would migrate from boiled apples even in the absence of sugar syrup - but I'm not sure.
– user20637
22 hours ago
@JAD Hat-tip for the accurate nitpick. I think you agree it's not osmosis. I wouldn't be surprised if syneresis also made a contribution- so water would migrate from boiled apples even in the absence of sugar syrup - but I'm not sure.
– user20637
22 hours ago
add a comment |
The syrup has very high sugar content and the apples much lower. The syrup pulls water out of the apples by a process known as osmosis, which tries to equalize the sugar concentration on each side of the permeable membranes of the apples' cells.
1
The other answer clearly had the right idea, but is wrong in both the word choice and the way it is described. It is still more descriptive than this answer. If someone knows what osmosis is, they understand that is what he was going for. If they don't, your answer doesn't help them understand what is going on. (Note that I did upvote because you are right.)
– KMB
2 days ago
@KMB I added a bit more detail.
– David Richerby
2 days ago
2
I upvoted because this is clearly the best answer, but "The syrup pulls water out of the apples" is a bit misleading, because the syrup isn't doing anything. As you mention, it's basically just that the system is tending towards uniformity/homogeneity. It's basically statistical mechanics.
– Faheem Mitha
2 days ago
add a comment |
The syrup has very high sugar content and the apples much lower. The syrup pulls water out of the apples by a process known as osmosis, which tries to equalize the sugar concentration on each side of the permeable membranes of the apples' cells.
1
The other answer clearly had the right idea, but is wrong in both the word choice and the way it is described. It is still more descriptive than this answer. If someone knows what osmosis is, they understand that is what he was going for. If they don't, your answer doesn't help them understand what is going on. (Note that I did upvote because you are right.)
– KMB
2 days ago
@KMB I added a bit more detail.
– David Richerby
2 days ago
2
I upvoted because this is clearly the best answer, but "The syrup pulls water out of the apples" is a bit misleading, because the syrup isn't doing anything. As you mention, it's basically just that the system is tending towards uniformity/homogeneity. It's basically statistical mechanics.
– Faheem Mitha
2 days ago
add a comment |
The syrup has very high sugar content and the apples much lower. The syrup pulls water out of the apples by a process known as osmosis, which tries to equalize the sugar concentration on each side of the permeable membranes of the apples' cells.
The syrup has very high sugar content and the apples much lower. The syrup pulls water out of the apples by a process known as osmosis, which tries to equalize the sugar concentration on each side of the permeable membranes of the apples' cells.
edited 2 days ago
answered 2 days ago
David Richerby
2,7271527
2,7271527
1
The other answer clearly had the right idea, but is wrong in both the word choice and the way it is described. It is still more descriptive than this answer. If someone knows what osmosis is, they understand that is what he was going for. If they don't, your answer doesn't help them understand what is going on. (Note that I did upvote because you are right.)
– KMB
2 days ago
@KMB I added a bit more detail.
– David Richerby
2 days ago
2
I upvoted because this is clearly the best answer, but "The syrup pulls water out of the apples" is a bit misleading, because the syrup isn't doing anything. As you mention, it's basically just that the system is tending towards uniformity/homogeneity. It's basically statistical mechanics.
– Faheem Mitha
2 days ago
add a comment |
1
The other answer clearly had the right idea, but is wrong in both the word choice and the way it is described. It is still more descriptive than this answer. If someone knows what osmosis is, they understand that is what he was going for. If they don't, your answer doesn't help them understand what is going on. (Note that I did upvote because you are right.)
– KMB
2 days ago
@KMB I added a bit more detail.
– David Richerby
2 days ago
2
I upvoted because this is clearly the best answer, but "The syrup pulls water out of the apples" is a bit misleading, because the syrup isn't doing anything. As you mention, it's basically just that the system is tending towards uniformity/homogeneity. It's basically statistical mechanics.
– Faheem Mitha
2 days ago
1
1
The other answer clearly had the right idea, but is wrong in both the word choice and the way it is described. It is still more descriptive than this answer. If someone knows what osmosis is, they understand that is what he was going for. If they don't, your answer doesn't help them understand what is going on. (Note that I did upvote because you are right.)
– KMB
2 days ago
The other answer clearly had the right idea, but is wrong in both the word choice and the way it is described. It is still more descriptive than this answer. If someone knows what osmosis is, they understand that is what he was going for. If they don't, your answer doesn't help them understand what is going on. (Note that I did upvote because you are right.)
– KMB
2 days ago
@KMB I added a bit more detail.
– David Richerby
2 days ago
@KMB I added a bit more detail.
– David Richerby
2 days ago
2
2
I upvoted because this is clearly the best answer, but "The syrup pulls water out of the apples" is a bit misleading, because the syrup isn't doing anything. As you mention, it's basically just that the system is tending towards uniformity/homogeneity. It's basically statistical mechanics.
– Faheem Mitha
2 days ago
I upvoted because this is clearly the best answer, but "The syrup pulls water out of the apples" is a bit misleading, because the syrup isn't doing anything. As you mention, it's basically just that the system is tending towards uniformity/homogeneity. It's basically statistical mechanics.
– Faheem Mitha
2 days ago
add a comment |
Sugar is hydrophilic, meaning it's attracted to water. Your water soaked/softened apples likely had a higher moisture content compared to your syrup. The water migrated out of the apples and equalized the sugar concentration. This process is referred to as osmosis.
Next time, try boiling the apples in that sugar syrup instead of just water.
9
@briantist Actually, the explanation is almost entirely wrong. First, "hygroscopic" refers to substances that absorb water vapour from the air, which isn't likely to be what's happening and which contradicts the rest of the answer. Second, it's not sugar moving from the syrup into the apples, but water moving from the apples into the syrup.
– David Richerby
2 days ago
5
This is the issue with the upvote system and the HNQ. An answer with a fancy word which looks plausible at first glance gets many upvotes, even when it makes no sense
– Tim
2 days ago
3
@Tim On the other hand, HNQ was the only reason I found this.
– David Richerby
2 days ago
2
The part about boiling the apples in the syrup next time is exactly right.
– JPmiaou
2 days ago
1
@DavidRicherby I suggested that edit around the time of your comment. It sat in the edit queue for too long. This is what i thought was the intent of his answer. He, for instance, thought the word for hydrophilic was hydroscopic which is a very common mistake (hygroscopic was a correction by someone else).
– KMB
yesterday
|
show 4 more comments
Sugar is hydrophilic, meaning it's attracted to water. Your water soaked/softened apples likely had a higher moisture content compared to your syrup. The water migrated out of the apples and equalized the sugar concentration. This process is referred to as osmosis.
Next time, try boiling the apples in that sugar syrup instead of just water.
9
@briantist Actually, the explanation is almost entirely wrong. First, "hygroscopic" refers to substances that absorb water vapour from the air, which isn't likely to be what's happening and which contradicts the rest of the answer. Second, it's not sugar moving from the syrup into the apples, but water moving from the apples into the syrup.
– David Richerby
2 days ago
5
This is the issue with the upvote system and the HNQ. An answer with a fancy word which looks plausible at first glance gets many upvotes, even when it makes no sense
– Tim
2 days ago
3
@Tim On the other hand, HNQ was the only reason I found this.
– David Richerby
2 days ago
2
The part about boiling the apples in the syrup next time is exactly right.
– JPmiaou
2 days ago
1
@DavidRicherby I suggested that edit around the time of your comment. It sat in the edit queue for too long. This is what i thought was the intent of his answer. He, for instance, thought the word for hydrophilic was hydroscopic which is a very common mistake (hygroscopic was a correction by someone else).
– KMB
yesterday
|
show 4 more comments
Sugar is hydrophilic, meaning it's attracted to water. Your water soaked/softened apples likely had a higher moisture content compared to your syrup. The water migrated out of the apples and equalized the sugar concentration. This process is referred to as osmosis.
Next time, try boiling the apples in that sugar syrup instead of just water.
Sugar is hydrophilic, meaning it's attracted to water. Your water soaked/softened apples likely had a higher moisture content compared to your syrup. The water migrated out of the apples and equalized the sugar concentration. This process is referred to as osmosis.
Next time, try boiling the apples in that sugar syrup instead of just water.
edited yesterday
KMB
20816
20816
answered 2 days ago
StevenXavier
1,176213
1,176213
9
@briantist Actually, the explanation is almost entirely wrong. First, "hygroscopic" refers to substances that absorb water vapour from the air, which isn't likely to be what's happening and which contradicts the rest of the answer. Second, it's not sugar moving from the syrup into the apples, but water moving from the apples into the syrup.
– David Richerby
2 days ago
5
This is the issue with the upvote system and the HNQ. An answer with a fancy word which looks plausible at first glance gets many upvotes, even when it makes no sense
– Tim
2 days ago
3
@Tim On the other hand, HNQ was the only reason I found this.
– David Richerby
2 days ago
2
The part about boiling the apples in the syrup next time is exactly right.
– JPmiaou
2 days ago
1
@DavidRicherby I suggested that edit around the time of your comment. It sat in the edit queue for too long. This is what i thought was the intent of his answer. He, for instance, thought the word for hydrophilic was hydroscopic which is a very common mistake (hygroscopic was a correction by someone else).
– KMB
yesterday
|
show 4 more comments
9
@briantist Actually, the explanation is almost entirely wrong. First, "hygroscopic" refers to substances that absorb water vapour from the air, which isn't likely to be what's happening and which contradicts the rest of the answer. Second, it's not sugar moving from the syrup into the apples, but water moving from the apples into the syrup.
– David Richerby
2 days ago
5
This is the issue with the upvote system and the HNQ. An answer with a fancy word which looks plausible at first glance gets many upvotes, even when it makes no sense
– Tim
2 days ago
3
@Tim On the other hand, HNQ was the only reason I found this.
– David Richerby
2 days ago
2
The part about boiling the apples in the syrup next time is exactly right.
– JPmiaou
2 days ago
1
@DavidRicherby I suggested that edit around the time of your comment. It sat in the edit queue for too long. This is what i thought was the intent of his answer. He, for instance, thought the word for hydrophilic was hydroscopic which is a very common mistake (hygroscopic was a correction by someone else).
– KMB
yesterday
9
9
@briantist Actually, the explanation is almost entirely wrong. First, "hygroscopic" refers to substances that absorb water vapour from the air, which isn't likely to be what's happening and which contradicts the rest of the answer. Second, it's not sugar moving from the syrup into the apples, but water moving from the apples into the syrup.
– David Richerby
2 days ago
@briantist Actually, the explanation is almost entirely wrong. First, "hygroscopic" refers to substances that absorb water vapour from the air, which isn't likely to be what's happening and which contradicts the rest of the answer. Second, it's not sugar moving from the syrup into the apples, but water moving from the apples into the syrup.
– David Richerby
2 days ago
5
5
This is the issue with the upvote system and the HNQ. An answer with a fancy word which looks plausible at first glance gets many upvotes, even when it makes no sense
– Tim
2 days ago
This is the issue with the upvote system and the HNQ. An answer with a fancy word which looks plausible at first glance gets many upvotes, even when it makes no sense
– Tim
2 days ago
3
3
@Tim On the other hand, HNQ was the only reason I found this.
– David Richerby
2 days ago
@Tim On the other hand, HNQ was the only reason I found this.
– David Richerby
2 days ago
2
2
The part about boiling the apples in the syrup next time is exactly right.
– JPmiaou
2 days ago
The part about boiling the apples in the syrup next time is exactly right.
– JPmiaou
2 days ago
1
1
@DavidRicherby I suggested that edit around the time of your comment. It sat in the edit queue for too long. This is what i thought was the intent of his answer. He, for instance, thought the word for hydrophilic was hydroscopic which is a very common mistake (hygroscopic was a correction by someone else).
– KMB
yesterday
@DavidRicherby I suggested that edit around the time of your comment. It sat in the edit queue for too long. This is what i thought was the intent of his answer. He, for instance, thought the word for hydrophilic was hydroscopic which is a very common mistake (hygroscopic was a correction by someone else).
– KMB
yesterday
|
show 4 more comments
Patricia Hoff is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Patricia Hoff is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Patricia Hoff is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Patricia Hoff is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Seasoned Advice!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcooking.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f95172%2fi-poured-simple-syrup-over-cooked-apples-why-did-it-turn-watery%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown