What was the first games console to support linking consoles together for local multiplayer?
Most video game consoles allow you to connect multiple controllers to them, for multiplayer gaming. Handheld game consoles, on the other hand, were designed to be used by one person at a time, but many supported the use of a link cable to connect two handhelds together to play. Popular examples include the Tetris and Pokémon games on the Nintendo Game Boy.
At the turn of the century, many "home" (non-portable) game consoles started to support multiplayer gaming over the internet, using a modem or network adapter connected to the console.
On the Nintendo GameCube, games such as Mario Kart: Double Dash supported the use of the network adapter in a local manner, i.e. without requiring an external internet connection. While four people could normally play on one console, connecting two consoles together would allow eight people to play together in the same room. (This would require two televisions, two network adapters, and a network cable to connect them.) One could even have sixteen players on four consoles connected together over a LAN!
Was the GameCube the first non-portable games console to support connecting consoles together in this manner (either directly or in a local area network), or is there an earlier example?
For the purposes of this question, I'm going to exclude home computers, or in other words, devices with a built-in keyboard: many of these had networking support. I'm also excluding games that required connecting to the internet or an external server: just local play examples, please.
game-consoles multiplayer-games
add a comment |
Most video game consoles allow you to connect multiple controllers to them, for multiplayer gaming. Handheld game consoles, on the other hand, were designed to be used by one person at a time, but many supported the use of a link cable to connect two handhelds together to play. Popular examples include the Tetris and Pokémon games on the Nintendo Game Boy.
At the turn of the century, many "home" (non-portable) game consoles started to support multiplayer gaming over the internet, using a modem or network adapter connected to the console.
On the Nintendo GameCube, games such as Mario Kart: Double Dash supported the use of the network adapter in a local manner, i.e. without requiring an external internet connection. While four people could normally play on one console, connecting two consoles together would allow eight people to play together in the same room. (This would require two televisions, two network adapters, and a network cable to connect them.) One could even have sixteen players on four consoles connected together over a LAN!
Was the GameCube the first non-portable games console to support connecting consoles together in this manner (either directly or in a local area network), or is there an earlier example?
For the purposes of this question, I'm going to exclude home computers, or in other words, devices with a built-in keyboard: many of these had networking support. I'm also excluding games that required connecting to the internet or an external server: just local play examples, please.
game-consoles multiplayer-games
For the nitpicking part, there where consoles with keyboads, most notably the Odyssey 2. Also, where does this place the Commodore 64 game system? Or the Max10 :)) SCNR
– Raffzahn
11 hours ago
add a comment |
Most video game consoles allow you to connect multiple controllers to them, for multiplayer gaming. Handheld game consoles, on the other hand, were designed to be used by one person at a time, but many supported the use of a link cable to connect two handhelds together to play. Popular examples include the Tetris and Pokémon games on the Nintendo Game Boy.
At the turn of the century, many "home" (non-portable) game consoles started to support multiplayer gaming over the internet, using a modem or network adapter connected to the console.
On the Nintendo GameCube, games such as Mario Kart: Double Dash supported the use of the network adapter in a local manner, i.e. without requiring an external internet connection. While four people could normally play on one console, connecting two consoles together would allow eight people to play together in the same room. (This would require two televisions, two network adapters, and a network cable to connect them.) One could even have sixteen players on four consoles connected together over a LAN!
Was the GameCube the first non-portable games console to support connecting consoles together in this manner (either directly or in a local area network), or is there an earlier example?
For the purposes of this question, I'm going to exclude home computers, or in other words, devices with a built-in keyboard: many of these had networking support. I'm also excluding games that required connecting to the internet or an external server: just local play examples, please.
game-consoles multiplayer-games
Most video game consoles allow you to connect multiple controllers to them, for multiplayer gaming. Handheld game consoles, on the other hand, were designed to be used by one person at a time, but many supported the use of a link cable to connect two handhelds together to play. Popular examples include the Tetris and Pokémon games on the Nintendo Game Boy.
At the turn of the century, many "home" (non-portable) game consoles started to support multiplayer gaming over the internet, using a modem or network adapter connected to the console.
On the Nintendo GameCube, games such as Mario Kart: Double Dash supported the use of the network adapter in a local manner, i.e. without requiring an external internet connection. While four people could normally play on one console, connecting two consoles together would allow eight people to play together in the same room. (This would require two televisions, two network adapters, and a network cable to connect them.) One could even have sixteen players on four consoles connected together over a LAN!
Was the GameCube the first non-portable games console to support connecting consoles together in this manner (either directly or in a local area network), or is there an earlier example?
For the purposes of this question, I'm going to exclude home computers, or in other words, devices with a built-in keyboard: many of these had networking support. I'm also excluding games that required connecting to the internet or an external server: just local play examples, please.
game-consoles multiplayer-games
game-consoles multiplayer-games
edited 8 hours ago
Kaz
asked 13 hours ago
KazKaz
1,245420
1,245420
For the nitpicking part, there where consoles with keyboads, most notably the Odyssey 2. Also, where does this place the Commodore 64 game system? Or the Max10 :)) SCNR
– Raffzahn
11 hours ago
add a comment |
For the nitpicking part, there where consoles with keyboads, most notably the Odyssey 2. Also, where does this place the Commodore 64 game system? Or the Max10 :)) SCNR
– Raffzahn
11 hours ago
For the nitpicking part, there where consoles with keyboads, most notably the Odyssey 2. Also, where does this place the Commodore 64 game system? Or the Max10 :)) SCNR
– Raffzahn
11 hours ago
For the nitpicking part, there where consoles with keyboads, most notably the Odyssey 2. Also, where does this place the Commodore 64 game system? Or the Max10 :)) SCNR
– Raffzahn
11 hours ago
add a comment |
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
The original PlayStation supported a link cable much like the Gameboy's out of the box via its serial port; e.g. you can see that European launch title, Wipeout, supported it by inspecting the row of features starting near the bottom left of the back of the box:

It is a passive cable, and became available in 1995.
If you'll allow intelligent peripherals then the Atari Jaguar, supported local networking in theory via its JagLink add-on, with the first game to utilise it, in a buggy fashion, being Doom from November 1994.
EDIT: contrary to my statement above, there's no active logic in a JagLink cable — just a single level-converter IC at each end. See Raffzahn's answer for more information on that. But that would give the Jaguar a claim date of November 1993, more than a year before the Playstation's Japanese launch.
Drats, yes. the Jaguar may be the right answer - stupid me, considering I even had one - including the link.
– Raffzahn
9 hours ago
I see no reason to disallow the JakLink add-on, given that the GameCube required a Broadband Adapter to connect to a LAN.
– Kaz
7 hours ago
add a comment |
An early example is the game Zero Tolerance for the SEGA Mega Drive / Genesis, which allowed for local multiplayer with two systems and two TV sets connecting both machines with a link cable.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zero_Tolerance_(video_game)
New contributor
César González Segura is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
I was wondering where the cable would plug into the Mega Drive; the linked article explains it was plugged into the second controller port of each console. It seems to be a rather clever method.
– Kaz
7 hours ago
1
Mega Drive controller ports can act as simple gamepad ports, following a protocol similar to SEGA's previous Master System but with support for more buttons, or as a generic serial or 4 bit parallel port. Probably Zero Tolerance is using one of these two later modes to connect both systems together, but I have never been able to check in code how they did it.
– César González Segura
6 hours ago
add a comment |
The question is a bit unclear on what is considered local.
Edit: Tommy's good answer included the Jaguar and JagLink which may be the right 'first' here. Something I forgot even though I had one back then - including JagLink and DOOM.
Except and unlike implied, the JagLink box doesn't change communication in any way like a LAN adaptor. Any right wired cable works, as the so called 'DSP-Port' is just a high speed (asynchronous) serial port operating at TTL level. This is fine for short distance connections - like a few feet - but will produce high error rates at longer distance.
In real life situations, families owning more than one console will not have them - and two TV sets - siting side by side, but rather in one in a bed room and on in the living room - or both in bed rooms. This will easy result in a distance of 15 m or more. Way too far for TTL signals at high speed. Of course expensive cable could help as well, except that's not exact consumer price level.
As a result Atari engineering came up with the little JagLink adapters. On the inside they feature a MAX232 type level shifter quadrupling voltage from 0V/5V to -10/+10V. This allowed the usage os simple unshielded twisted pair (telephone wire) for longer distance.

(Picture taken from Matthias Domins http://www.mdgames.de/ site)
So with the Jaguar introduced in 1993/94 and Doom delivered in 1994 with JagLink cables the same time, it could as well qualify as first here. So far there were only two other (original) games using thee link: Doom and Air Cars released in 1997. The third, often cited title, Battle Sphere was announced in 1994, but went into development hell until finally (re-)released in 2000.
Depending on how this is iterated, one answer could be the Sega Dreamcast. While games where primarily meant to be connected via online services like Seganet, it could, unlike its predecessor the Sega Saturn, also use a LAN adaptor to play some games locally. Being introduced in 1998, it predates the Game Cube by three years (*1).
Now, if playing via an online service is a valid answer (*2), then already Sega's MegaDrive (Genesis) enabled this in 1990 with the Mega Modem add-on from Sega, as well as with XBAND's system which even allowed gaming across console borders by supporting MegaDrive and NES consoles in 1994.
According to Faddens comment, the gameplay on XBAND did, after establishing a pairing via the online service, move into a direct communication, eliminating the online part. This would make it somewhat eligible regarding the local part.
Out of scope, but maybe interesting here: Delivery of games via online services is almost as old as cartridge based consoles:
In 1980 CVC introduced their Master Module for the Atari VCS 2600, able to connect to the GameLine online service and download games.
A year later, in 1981, Mattel introduced PlayCable, where a modem plugged into the cartridge slot would connect to TV cable and download games that where continuously streamed.
The different approaches are quite interesting. Where GameLine reassembles online services, PlayCable is a strict unidirectional broadcasting technology. All games offered where streamed continuously on separate (mono audio) channels, plus one channel streaming a menu program to allow dynamic selection, basically a dictionary service.
*1 - The Dreamcast also featured a link cable to connect a Neo Geo Pocket Color, so beating the Game Cube here as well.
*2 - The question is somewhat unclear here in bringing this as example, but asking as well about 'local'. Thus two local systems connected via an online service may or may not be valid.
1
The XBAND devices had to contact the service to be matched to each other. The actual gameplay was peer-to-peer over the phone line, not through the service, so once past the setup phase it technically qualifies for this question... assuming a couple miles of POTS wiring is considered "local". The service-side matching precludes the use of a phone line simulator (unless you've got quick hands).
– fadden
8 hours ago
add a comment |
Does MIDI maze, a death match (shooting pac-man like characters in a first-person view maze) released for the Atari ST in 1987 and using the ST's Midi connection for the required networking count? I remember parties of something like 8 players indulging in this thing.
Great one - except the St was a (home) computer - which is excluded as per the last paragraph
– Raffzahn
4 hours ago
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "648"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fretrocomputing.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f9145%2fwhat-was-the-first-games-console-to-support-linking-consoles-together-for-local%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
The original PlayStation supported a link cable much like the Gameboy's out of the box via its serial port; e.g. you can see that European launch title, Wipeout, supported it by inspecting the row of features starting near the bottom left of the back of the box:

It is a passive cable, and became available in 1995.
If you'll allow intelligent peripherals then the Atari Jaguar, supported local networking in theory via its JagLink add-on, with the first game to utilise it, in a buggy fashion, being Doom from November 1994.
EDIT: contrary to my statement above, there's no active logic in a JagLink cable — just a single level-converter IC at each end. See Raffzahn's answer for more information on that. But that would give the Jaguar a claim date of November 1993, more than a year before the Playstation's Japanese launch.
Drats, yes. the Jaguar may be the right answer - stupid me, considering I even had one - including the link.
– Raffzahn
9 hours ago
I see no reason to disallow the JakLink add-on, given that the GameCube required a Broadband Adapter to connect to a LAN.
– Kaz
7 hours ago
add a comment |
The original PlayStation supported a link cable much like the Gameboy's out of the box via its serial port; e.g. you can see that European launch title, Wipeout, supported it by inspecting the row of features starting near the bottom left of the back of the box:

It is a passive cable, and became available in 1995.
If you'll allow intelligent peripherals then the Atari Jaguar, supported local networking in theory via its JagLink add-on, with the first game to utilise it, in a buggy fashion, being Doom from November 1994.
EDIT: contrary to my statement above, there's no active logic in a JagLink cable — just a single level-converter IC at each end. See Raffzahn's answer for more information on that. But that would give the Jaguar a claim date of November 1993, more than a year before the Playstation's Japanese launch.
Drats, yes. the Jaguar may be the right answer - stupid me, considering I even had one - including the link.
– Raffzahn
9 hours ago
I see no reason to disallow the JakLink add-on, given that the GameCube required a Broadband Adapter to connect to a LAN.
– Kaz
7 hours ago
add a comment |
The original PlayStation supported a link cable much like the Gameboy's out of the box via its serial port; e.g. you can see that European launch title, Wipeout, supported it by inspecting the row of features starting near the bottom left of the back of the box:

It is a passive cable, and became available in 1995.
If you'll allow intelligent peripherals then the Atari Jaguar, supported local networking in theory via its JagLink add-on, with the first game to utilise it, in a buggy fashion, being Doom from November 1994.
EDIT: contrary to my statement above, there's no active logic in a JagLink cable — just a single level-converter IC at each end. See Raffzahn's answer for more information on that. But that would give the Jaguar a claim date of November 1993, more than a year before the Playstation's Japanese launch.
The original PlayStation supported a link cable much like the Gameboy's out of the box via its serial port; e.g. you can see that European launch title, Wipeout, supported it by inspecting the row of features starting near the bottom left of the back of the box:

It is a passive cable, and became available in 1995.
If you'll allow intelligent peripherals then the Atari Jaguar, supported local networking in theory via its JagLink add-on, with the first game to utilise it, in a buggy fashion, being Doom from November 1994.
EDIT: contrary to my statement above, there's no active logic in a JagLink cable — just a single level-converter IC at each end. See Raffzahn's answer for more information on that. But that would give the Jaguar a claim date of November 1993, more than a year before the Playstation's Japanese launch.
edited 4 hours ago
answered 9 hours ago
TommyTommy
14.7k14072
14.7k14072
Drats, yes. the Jaguar may be the right answer - stupid me, considering I even had one - including the link.
– Raffzahn
9 hours ago
I see no reason to disallow the JakLink add-on, given that the GameCube required a Broadband Adapter to connect to a LAN.
– Kaz
7 hours ago
add a comment |
Drats, yes. the Jaguar may be the right answer - stupid me, considering I even had one - including the link.
– Raffzahn
9 hours ago
I see no reason to disallow the JakLink add-on, given that the GameCube required a Broadband Adapter to connect to a LAN.
– Kaz
7 hours ago
Drats, yes. the Jaguar may be the right answer - stupid me, considering I even had one - including the link.
– Raffzahn
9 hours ago
Drats, yes. the Jaguar may be the right answer - stupid me, considering I even had one - including the link.
– Raffzahn
9 hours ago
I see no reason to disallow the JakLink add-on, given that the GameCube required a Broadband Adapter to connect to a LAN.
– Kaz
7 hours ago
I see no reason to disallow the JakLink add-on, given that the GameCube required a Broadband Adapter to connect to a LAN.
– Kaz
7 hours ago
add a comment |
An early example is the game Zero Tolerance for the SEGA Mega Drive / Genesis, which allowed for local multiplayer with two systems and two TV sets connecting both machines with a link cable.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zero_Tolerance_(video_game)
New contributor
César González Segura is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
I was wondering where the cable would plug into the Mega Drive; the linked article explains it was plugged into the second controller port of each console. It seems to be a rather clever method.
– Kaz
7 hours ago
1
Mega Drive controller ports can act as simple gamepad ports, following a protocol similar to SEGA's previous Master System but with support for more buttons, or as a generic serial or 4 bit parallel port. Probably Zero Tolerance is using one of these two later modes to connect both systems together, but I have never been able to check in code how they did it.
– César González Segura
6 hours ago
add a comment |
An early example is the game Zero Tolerance for the SEGA Mega Drive / Genesis, which allowed for local multiplayer with two systems and two TV sets connecting both machines with a link cable.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zero_Tolerance_(video_game)
New contributor
César González Segura is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
I was wondering where the cable would plug into the Mega Drive; the linked article explains it was plugged into the second controller port of each console. It seems to be a rather clever method.
– Kaz
7 hours ago
1
Mega Drive controller ports can act as simple gamepad ports, following a protocol similar to SEGA's previous Master System but with support for more buttons, or as a generic serial or 4 bit parallel port. Probably Zero Tolerance is using one of these two later modes to connect both systems together, but I have never been able to check in code how they did it.
– César González Segura
6 hours ago
add a comment |
An early example is the game Zero Tolerance for the SEGA Mega Drive / Genesis, which allowed for local multiplayer with two systems and two TV sets connecting both machines with a link cable.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zero_Tolerance_(video_game)
New contributor
César González Segura is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
An early example is the game Zero Tolerance for the SEGA Mega Drive / Genesis, which allowed for local multiplayer with two systems and two TV sets connecting both machines with a link cable.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zero_Tolerance_(video_game)
New contributor
César González Segura is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
César González Segura is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
answered 8 hours ago
César González SeguraCésar González Segura
311
311
New contributor
César González Segura is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
César González Segura is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
César González Segura is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
I was wondering where the cable would plug into the Mega Drive; the linked article explains it was plugged into the second controller port of each console. It seems to be a rather clever method.
– Kaz
7 hours ago
1
Mega Drive controller ports can act as simple gamepad ports, following a protocol similar to SEGA's previous Master System but with support for more buttons, or as a generic serial or 4 bit parallel port. Probably Zero Tolerance is using one of these two later modes to connect both systems together, but I have never been able to check in code how they did it.
– César González Segura
6 hours ago
add a comment |
I was wondering where the cable would plug into the Mega Drive; the linked article explains it was plugged into the second controller port of each console. It seems to be a rather clever method.
– Kaz
7 hours ago
1
Mega Drive controller ports can act as simple gamepad ports, following a protocol similar to SEGA's previous Master System but with support for more buttons, or as a generic serial or 4 bit parallel port. Probably Zero Tolerance is using one of these two later modes to connect both systems together, but I have never been able to check in code how they did it.
– César González Segura
6 hours ago
I was wondering where the cable would plug into the Mega Drive; the linked article explains it was plugged into the second controller port of each console. It seems to be a rather clever method.
– Kaz
7 hours ago
I was wondering where the cable would plug into the Mega Drive; the linked article explains it was plugged into the second controller port of each console. It seems to be a rather clever method.
– Kaz
7 hours ago
1
1
Mega Drive controller ports can act as simple gamepad ports, following a protocol similar to SEGA's previous Master System but with support for more buttons, or as a generic serial or 4 bit parallel port. Probably Zero Tolerance is using one of these two later modes to connect both systems together, but I have never been able to check in code how they did it.
– César González Segura
6 hours ago
Mega Drive controller ports can act as simple gamepad ports, following a protocol similar to SEGA's previous Master System but with support for more buttons, or as a generic serial or 4 bit parallel port. Probably Zero Tolerance is using one of these two later modes to connect both systems together, but I have never been able to check in code how they did it.
– César González Segura
6 hours ago
add a comment |
The question is a bit unclear on what is considered local.
Edit: Tommy's good answer included the Jaguar and JagLink which may be the right 'first' here. Something I forgot even though I had one back then - including JagLink and DOOM.
Except and unlike implied, the JagLink box doesn't change communication in any way like a LAN adaptor. Any right wired cable works, as the so called 'DSP-Port' is just a high speed (asynchronous) serial port operating at TTL level. This is fine for short distance connections - like a few feet - but will produce high error rates at longer distance.
In real life situations, families owning more than one console will not have them - and two TV sets - siting side by side, but rather in one in a bed room and on in the living room - or both in bed rooms. This will easy result in a distance of 15 m or more. Way too far for TTL signals at high speed. Of course expensive cable could help as well, except that's not exact consumer price level.
As a result Atari engineering came up with the little JagLink adapters. On the inside they feature a MAX232 type level shifter quadrupling voltage from 0V/5V to -10/+10V. This allowed the usage os simple unshielded twisted pair (telephone wire) for longer distance.

(Picture taken from Matthias Domins http://www.mdgames.de/ site)
So with the Jaguar introduced in 1993/94 and Doom delivered in 1994 with JagLink cables the same time, it could as well qualify as first here. So far there were only two other (original) games using thee link: Doom and Air Cars released in 1997. The third, often cited title, Battle Sphere was announced in 1994, but went into development hell until finally (re-)released in 2000.
Depending on how this is iterated, one answer could be the Sega Dreamcast. While games where primarily meant to be connected via online services like Seganet, it could, unlike its predecessor the Sega Saturn, also use a LAN adaptor to play some games locally. Being introduced in 1998, it predates the Game Cube by three years (*1).
Now, if playing via an online service is a valid answer (*2), then already Sega's MegaDrive (Genesis) enabled this in 1990 with the Mega Modem add-on from Sega, as well as with XBAND's system which even allowed gaming across console borders by supporting MegaDrive and NES consoles in 1994.
According to Faddens comment, the gameplay on XBAND did, after establishing a pairing via the online service, move into a direct communication, eliminating the online part. This would make it somewhat eligible regarding the local part.
Out of scope, but maybe interesting here: Delivery of games via online services is almost as old as cartridge based consoles:
In 1980 CVC introduced their Master Module for the Atari VCS 2600, able to connect to the GameLine online service and download games.
A year later, in 1981, Mattel introduced PlayCable, where a modem plugged into the cartridge slot would connect to TV cable and download games that where continuously streamed.
The different approaches are quite interesting. Where GameLine reassembles online services, PlayCable is a strict unidirectional broadcasting technology. All games offered where streamed continuously on separate (mono audio) channels, plus one channel streaming a menu program to allow dynamic selection, basically a dictionary service.
*1 - The Dreamcast also featured a link cable to connect a Neo Geo Pocket Color, so beating the Game Cube here as well.
*2 - The question is somewhat unclear here in bringing this as example, but asking as well about 'local'. Thus two local systems connected via an online service may or may not be valid.
1
The XBAND devices had to contact the service to be matched to each other. The actual gameplay was peer-to-peer over the phone line, not through the service, so once past the setup phase it technically qualifies for this question... assuming a couple miles of POTS wiring is considered "local". The service-side matching precludes the use of a phone line simulator (unless you've got quick hands).
– fadden
8 hours ago
add a comment |
The question is a bit unclear on what is considered local.
Edit: Tommy's good answer included the Jaguar and JagLink which may be the right 'first' here. Something I forgot even though I had one back then - including JagLink and DOOM.
Except and unlike implied, the JagLink box doesn't change communication in any way like a LAN adaptor. Any right wired cable works, as the so called 'DSP-Port' is just a high speed (asynchronous) serial port operating at TTL level. This is fine for short distance connections - like a few feet - but will produce high error rates at longer distance.
In real life situations, families owning more than one console will not have them - and two TV sets - siting side by side, but rather in one in a bed room and on in the living room - or both in bed rooms. This will easy result in a distance of 15 m or more. Way too far for TTL signals at high speed. Of course expensive cable could help as well, except that's not exact consumer price level.
As a result Atari engineering came up with the little JagLink adapters. On the inside they feature a MAX232 type level shifter quadrupling voltage from 0V/5V to -10/+10V. This allowed the usage os simple unshielded twisted pair (telephone wire) for longer distance.

(Picture taken from Matthias Domins http://www.mdgames.de/ site)
So with the Jaguar introduced in 1993/94 and Doom delivered in 1994 with JagLink cables the same time, it could as well qualify as first here. So far there were only two other (original) games using thee link: Doom and Air Cars released in 1997. The third, often cited title, Battle Sphere was announced in 1994, but went into development hell until finally (re-)released in 2000.
Depending on how this is iterated, one answer could be the Sega Dreamcast. While games where primarily meant to be connected via online services like Seganet, it could, unlike its predecessor the Sega Saturn, also use a LAN adaptor to play some games locally. Being introduced in 1998, it predates the Game Cube by three years (*1).
Now, if playing via an online service is a valid answer (*2), then already Sega's MegaDrive (Genesis) enabled this in 1990 with the Mega Modem add-on from Sega, as well as with XBAND's system which even allowed gaming across console borders by supporting MegaDrive and NES consoles in 1994.
According to Faddens comment, the gameplay on XBAND did, after establishing a pairing via the online service, move into a direct communication, eliminating the online part. This would make it somewhat eligible regarding the local part.
Out of scope, but maybe interesting here: Delivery of games via online services is almost as old as cartridge based consoles:
In 1980 CVC introduced their Master Module for the Atari VCS 2600, able to connect to the GameLine online service and download games.
A year later, in 1981, Mattel introduced PlayCable, where a modem plugged into the cartridge slot would connect to TV cable and download games that where continuously streamed.
The different approaches are quite interesting. Where GameLine reassembles online services, PlayCable is a strict unidirectional broadcasting technology. All games offered where streamed continuously on separate (mono audio) channels, plus one channel streaming a menu program to allow dynamic selection, basically a dictionary service.
*1 - The Dreamcast also featured a link cable to connect a Neo Geo Pocket Color, so beating the Game Cube here as well.
*2 - The question is somewhat unclear here in bringing this as example, but asking as well about 'local'. Thus two local systems connected via an online service may or may not be valid.
1
The XBAND devices had to contact the service to be matched to each other. The actual gameplay was peer-to-peer over the phone line, not through the service, so once past the setup phase it technically qualifies for this question... assuming a couple miles of POTS wiring is considered "local". The service-side matching precludes the use of a phone line simulator (unless you've got quick hands).
– fadden
8 hours ago
add a comment |
The question is a bit unclear on what is considered local.
Edit: Tommy's good answer included the Jaguar and JagLink which may be the right 'first' here. Something I forgot even though I had one back then - including JagLink and DOOM.
Except and unlike implied, the JagLink box doesn't change communication in any way like a LAN adaptor. Any right wired cable works, as the so called 'DSP-Port' is just a high speed (asynchronous) serial port operating at TTL level. This is fine for short distance connections - like a few feet - but will produce high error rates at longer distance.
In real life situations, families owning more than one console will not have them - and two TV sets - siting side by side, but rather in one in a bed room and on in the living room - or both in bed rooms. This will easy result in a distance of 15 m or more. Way too far for TTL signals at high speed. Of course expensive cable could help as well, except that's not exact consumer price level.
As a result Atari engineering came up with the little JagLink adapters. On the inside they feature a MAX232 type level shifter quadrupling voltage from 0V/5V to -10/+10V. This allowed the usage os simple unshielded twisted pair (telephone wire) for longer distance.

(Picture taken from Matthias Domins http://www.mdgames.de/ site)
So with the Jaguar introduced in 1993/94 and Doom delivered in 1994 with JagLink cables the same time, it could as well qualify as first here. So far there were only two other (original) games using thee link: Doom and Air Cars released in 1997. The third, often cited title, Battle Sphere was announced in 1994, but went into development hell until finally (re-)released in 2000.
Depending on how this is iterated, one answer could be the Sega Dreamcast. While games where primarily meant to be connected via online services like Seganet, it could, unlike its predecessor the Sega Saturn, also use a LAN adaptor to play some games locally. Being introduced in 1998, it predates the Game Cube by three years (*1).
Now, if playing via an online service is a valid answer (*2), then already Sega's MegaDrive (Genesis) enabled this in 1990 with the Mega Modem add-on from Sega, as well as with XBAND's system which even allowed gaming across console borders by supporting MegaDrive and NES consoles in 1994.
According to Faddens comment, the gameplay on XBAND did, after establishing a pairing via the online service, move into a direct communication, eliminating the online part. This would make it somewhat eligible regarding the local part.
Out of scope, but maybe interesting here: Delivery of games via online services is almost as old as cartridge based consoles:
In 1980 CVC introduced their Master Module for the Atari VCS 2600, able to connect to the GameLine online service and download games.
A year later, in 1981, Mattel introduced PlayCable, where a modem plugged into the cartridge slot would connect to TV cable and download games that where continuously streamed.
The different approaches are quite interesting. Where GameLine reassembles online services, PlayCable is a strict unidirectional broadcasting technology. All games offered where streamed continuously on separate (mono audio) channels, plus one channel streaming a menu program to allow dynamic selection, basically a dictionary service.
*1 - The Dreamcast also featured a link cable to connect a Neo Geo Pocket Color, so beating the Game Cube here as well.
*2 - The question is somewhat unclear here in bringing this as example, but asking as well about 'local'. Thus two local systems connected via an online service may or may not be valid.
The question is a bit unclear on what is considered local.
Edit: Tommy's good answer included the Jaguar and JagLink which may be the right 'first' here. Something I forgot even though I had one back then - including JagLink and DOOM.
Except and unlike implied, the JagLink box doesn't change communication in any way like a LAN adaptor. Any right wired cable works, as the so called 'DSP-Port' is just a high speed (asynchronous) serial port operating at TTL level. This is fine for short distance connections - like a few feet - but will produce high error rates at longer distance.
In real life situations, families owning more than one console will not have them - and two TV sets - siting side by side, but rather in one in a bed room and on in the living room - or both in bed rooms. This will easy result in a distance of 15 m or more. Way too far for TTL signals at high speed. Of course expensive cable could help as well, except that's not exact consumer price level.
As a result Atari engineering came up with the little JagLink adapters. On the inside they feature a MAX232 type level shifter quadrupling voltage from 0V/5V to -10/+10V. This allowed the usage os simple unshielded twisted pair (telephone wire) for longer distance.

(Picture taken from Matthias Domins http://www.mdgames.de/ site)
So with the Jaguar introduced in 1993/94 and Doom delivered in 1994 with JagLink cables the same time, it could as well qualify as first here. So far there were only two other (original) games using thee link: Doom and Air Cars released in 1997. The third, often cited title, Battle Sphere was announced in 1994, but went into development hell until finally (re-)released in 2000.
Depending on how this is iterated, one answer could be the Sega Dreamcast. While games where primarily meant to be connected via online services like Seganet, it could, unlike its predecessor the Sega Saturn, also use a LAN adaptor to play some games locally. Being introduced in 1998, it predates the Game Cube by three years (*1).
Now, if playing via an online service is a valid answer (*2), then already Sega's MegaDrive (Genesis) enabled this in 1990 with the Mega Modem add-on from Sega, as well as with XBAND's system which even allowed gaming across console borders by supporting MegaDrive and NES consoles in 1994.
According to Faddens comment, the gameplay on XBAND did, after establishing a pairing via the online service, move into a direct communication, eliminating the online part. This would make it somewhat eligible regarding the local part.
Out of scope, but maybe interesting here: Delivery of games via online services is almost as old as cartridge based consoles:
In 1980 CVC introduced their Master Module for the Atari VCS 2600, able to connect to the GameLine online service and download games.
A year later, in 1981, Mattel introduced PlayCable, where a modem plugged into the cartridge slot would connect to TV cable and download games that where continuously streamed.
The different approaches are quite interesting. Where GameLine reassembles online services, PlayCable is a strict unidirectional broadcasting technology. All games offered where streamed continuously on separate (mono audio) channels, plus one channel streaming a menu program to allow dynamic selection, basically a dictionary service.
*1 - The Dreamcast also featured a link cable to connect a Neo Geo Pocket Color, so beating the Game Cube here as well.
*2 - The question is somewhat unclear here in bringing this as example, but asking as well about 'local'. Thus two local systems connected via an online service may or may not be valid.
edited 4 hours ago
answered 9 hours ago
RaffzahnRaffzahn
50.5k6119205
50.5k6119205
1
The XBAND devices had to contact the service to be matched to each other. The actual gameplay was peer-to-peer over the phone line, not through the service, so once past the setup phase it technically qualifies for this question... assuming a couple miles of POTS wiring is considered "local". The service-side matching precludes the use of a phone line simulator (unless you've got quick hands).
– fadden
8 hours ago
add a comment |
1
The XBAND devices had to contact the service to be matched to each other. The actual gameplay was peer-to-peer over the phone line, not through the service, so once past the setup phase it technically qualifies for this question... assuming a couple miles of POTS wiring is considered "local". The service-side matching precludes the use of a phone line simulator (unless you've got quick hands).
– fadden
8 hours ago
1
1
The XBAND devices had to contact the service to be matched to each other. The actual gameplay was peer-to-peer over the phone line, not through the service, so once past the setup phase it technically qualifies for this question... assuming a couple miles of POTS wiring is considered "local". The service-side matching precludes the use of a phone line simulator (unless you've got quick hands).
– fadden
8 hours ago
The XBAND devices had to contact the service to be matched to each other. The actual gameplay was peer-to-peer over the phone line, not through the service, so once past the setup phase it technically qualifies for this question... assuming a couple miles of POTS wiring is considered "local". The service-side matching precludes the use of a phone line simulator (unless you've got quick hands).
– fadden
8 hours ago
add a comment |
Does MIDI maze, a death match (shooting pac-man like characters in a first-person view maze) released for the Atari ST in 1987 and using the ST's Midi connection for the required networking count? I remember parties of something like 8 players indulging in this thing.
Great one - except the St was a (home) computer - which is excluded as per the last paragraph
– Raffzahn
4 hours ago
add a comment |
Does MIDI maze, a death match (shooting pac-man like characters in a first-person view maze) released for the Atari ST in 1987 and using the ST's Midi connection for the required networking count? I remember parties of something like 8 players indulging in this thing.
Great one - except the St was a (home) computer - which is excluded as per the last paragraph
– Raffzahn
4 hours ago
add a comment |
Does MIDI maze, a death match (shooting pac-man like characters in a first-person view maze) released for the Atari ST in 1987 and using the ST's Midi connection for the required networking count? I remember parties of something like 8 players indulging in this thing.
Does MIDI maze, a death match (shooting pac-man like characters in a first-person view maze) released for the Atari ST in 1987 and using the ST's Midi connection for the required networking count? I remember parties of something like 8 players indulging in this thing.
answered 4 hours ago
user11928
Great one - except the St was a (home) computer - which is excluded as per the last paragraph
– Raffzahn
4 hours ago
add a comment |
Great one - except the St was a (home) computer - which is excluded as per the last paragraph
– Raffzahn
4 hours ago
Great one - except the St was a (home) computer - which is excluded as per the last paragraph
– Raffzahn
4 hours ago
Great one - except the St was a (home) computer - which is excluded as per the last paragraph
– Raffzahn
4 hours ago
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Retrocomputing Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fretrocomputing.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f9145%2fwhat-was-the-first-games-console-to-support-linking-consoles-together-for-local%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
For the nitpicking part, there where consoles with keyboads, most notably the Odyssey 2. Also, where does this place the Commodore 64 game system? Or the Max10 :)) SCNR
– Raffzahn
11 hours ago