How do apertures which seem too large to physically fit work? [duplicate]
This question already has an answer here:
Is the size of the entrance pupil the same as the size of the effective aperture?
2 answers
A 400mm f4.0 lens is supposed to have a maximum aperture diameter of 10cm. Looking at such a lens they don't seem big enough to fit that kind of aperture including all the mechanics for control inside them. Do modern lenses have a way of focusing light into a smaller aperture to behave like a bigger one or are they really always the size that the formula (fstop = focal length / aperture diameter) suggests?
lens aperture lens-design physics
marked as duplicate by Michael C
StackExchange.ready(function() {
if (StackExchange.options.isMobile) return;
$('.dupe-hammer-message-hover:not(.hover-bound)').each(function() {
var $hover = $(this).addClass('hover-bound'),
$msg = $hover.siblings('.dupe-hammer-message');
$hover.hover(
function() {
$hover.showInfoMessage('', {
messageElement: $msg.clone().show(),
transient: false,
position: { my: 'bottom left', at: 'top center', offsetTop: -7 },
dismissable: false,
relativeToBody: true
});
},
function() {
StackExchange.helpers.removeMessages();
}
);
});
});
Mar 23 at 7:42
This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.
add a comment |
This question already has an answer here:
Is the size of the entrance pupil the same as the size of the effective aperture?
2 answers
A 400mm f4.0 lens is supposed to have a maximum aperture diameter of 10cm. Looking at such a lens they don't seem big enough to fit that kind of aperture including all the mechanics for control inside them. Do modern lenses have a way of focusing light into a smaller aperture to behave like a bigger one or are they really always the size that the formula (fstop = focal length / aperture diameter) suggests?
lens aperture lens-design physics
marked as duplicate by Michael C
StackExchange.ready(function() {
if (StackExchange.options.isMobile) return;
$('.dupe-hammer-message-hover:not(.hover-bound)').each(function() {
var $hover = $(this).addClass('hover-bound'),
$msg = $hover.siblings('.dupe-hammer-message');
$hover.hover(
function() {
$hover.showInfoMessage('', {
messageElement: $msg.clone().show(),
transient: false,
position: { my: 'bottom left', at: 'top center', offsetTop: -7 },
dismissable: false,
relativeToBody: true
});
},
function() {
StackExchange.helpers.removeMessages();
}
);
});
});
Mar 23 at 7:42
This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.
1
Related: How do zoom lenses restrict their widest aperture at the telephoto end? and How wide does the front element of a lens has to be, given the focal length and the aperture? and How is the F stop number derived? and Why doesn't the picture become darker the more you zoom in? and Why do lenses have different diameters?
– Michael C
Mar 23 at 8:25
I'm not sure this is the same question as the dupe. Answers to that question — for that matter, the question itself — assume understanding of effective aperture, which is basically the answer here. That question is more of a follow up detail.
– mattdm
Mar 23 at 14:54
add a comment |
This question already has an answer here:
Is the size of the entrance pupil the same as the size of the effective aperture?
2 answers
A 400mm f4.0 lens is supposed to have a maximum aperture diameter of 10cm. Looking at such a lens they don't seem big enough to fit that kind of aperture including all the mechanics for control inside them. Do modern lenses have a way of focusing light into a smaller aperture to behave like a bigger one or are they really always the size that the formula (fstop = focal length / aperture diameter) suggests?
lens aperture lens-design physics
This question already has an answer here:
Is the size of the entrance pupil the same as the size of the effective aperture?
2 answers
A 400mm f4.0 lens is supposed to have a maximum aperture diameter of 10cm. Looking at such a lens they don't seem big enough to fit that kind of aperture including all the mechanics for control inside them. Do modern lenses have a way of focusing light into a smaller aperture to behave like a bigger one or are they really always the size that the formula (fstop = focal length / aperture diameter) suggests?
This question already has an answer here:
Is the size of the entrance pupil the same as the size of the effective aperture?
2 answers
lens aperture lens-design physics
lens aperture lens-design physics
edited Mar 22 at 17:46
mattdm
122k40357653
122k40357653
asked Mar 22 at 16:13
LuLeBeLuLeBe
683
683
marked as duplicate by Michael C
StackExchange.ready(function() {
if (StackExchange.options.isMobile) return;
$('.dupe-hammer-message-hover:not(.hover-bound)').each(function() {
var $hover = $(this).addClass('hover-bound'),
$msg = $hover.siblings('.dupe-hammer-message');
$hover.hover(
function() {
$hover.showInfoMessage('', {
messageElement: $msg.clone().show(),
transient: false,
position: { my: 'bottom left', at: 'top center', offsetTop: -7 },
dismissable: false,
relativeToBody: true
});
},
function() {
StackExchange.helpers.removeMessages();
}
);
});
});
Mar 23 at 7:42
This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.
marked as duplicate by Michael C
StackExchange.ready(function() {
if (StackExchange.options.isMobile) return;
$('.dupe-hammer-message-hover:not(.hover-bound)').each(function() {
var $hover = $(this).addClass('hover-bound'),
$msg = $hover.siblings('.dupe-hammer-message');
$hover.hover(
function() {
$hover.showInfoMessage('', {
messageElement: $msg.clone().show(),
transient: false,
position: { my: 'bottom left', at: 'top center', offsetTop: -7 },
dismissable: false,
relativeToBody: true
});
},
function() {
StackExchange.helpers.removeMessages();
}
);
});
});
Mar 23 at 7:42
This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.
1
Related: How do zoom lenses restrict their widest aperture at the telephoto end? and How wide does the front element of a lens has to be, given the focal length and the aperture? and How is the F stop number derived? and Why doesn't the picture become darker the more you zoom in? and Why do lenses have different diameters?
– Michael C
Mar 23 at 8:25
I'm not sure this is the same question as the dupe. Answers to that question — for that matter, the question itself — assume understanding of effective aperture, which is basically the answer here. That question is more of a follow up detail.
– mattdm
Mar 23 at 14:54
add a comment |
1
Related: How do zoom lenses restrict their widest aperture at the telephoto end? and How wide does the front element of a lens has to be, given the focal length and the aperture? and How is the F stop number derived? and Why doesn't the picture become darker the more you zoom in? and Why do lenses have different diameters?
– Michael C
Mar 23 at 8:25
I'm not sure this is the same question as the dupe. Answers to that question — for that matter, the question itself — assume understanding of effective aperture, which is basically the answer here. That question is more of a follow up detail.
– mattdm
Mar 23 at 14:54
1
1
Related: How do zoom lenses restrict their widest aperture at the telephoto end? and How wide does the front element of a lens has to be, given the focal length and the aperture? and How is the F stop number derived? and Why doesn't the picture become darker the more you zoom in? and Why do lenses have different diameters?
– Michael C
Mar 23 at 8:25
Related: How do zoom lenses restrict their widest aperture at the telephoto end? and How wide does the front element of a lens has to be, given the focal length and the aperture? and How is the F stop number derived? and Why doesn't the picture become darker the more you zoom in? and Why do lenses have different diameters?
– Michael C
Mar 23 at 8:25
I'm not sure this is the same question as the dupe. Answers to that question — for that matter, the question itself — assume understanding of effective aperture, which is basically the answer here. That question is more of a follow up detail.
– mattdm
Mar 23 at 14:54
I'm not sure this is the same question as the dupe. Answers to that question — for that matter, the question itself — assume understanding of effective aperture, which is basically the answer here. That question is more of a follow up detail.
– mattdm
Mar 23 at 14:54
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
Your observations of the lens leads you to both a correct, and incorrect, conclusion.
Correct: the aperture (i.e., mechanical iris) of the lens is substantially smaller than the 10 cm it supposedly should be. Only the front element is anywhere near 10 cm diameter. Where the iris mechanism is in the lens barrel, the diameter is substantially smaller than 10 cm.
Incorrect: the stated aperture size is not actually 10 cm in diameter. In reality, it is the the apparent size of the wide-open aperture (the iris), when viewed through the front of the lens, that is 10 cm in diameter.
For any lens, the aperture when viewed through the front of the lens is known as the entrance pupil. It is the entrance pupil that is 10 cm in diameter.
See also:
- Size of the entrance pupil vs size of the aperture
1
That made it so clear, even better than the first answer. I think I understood it now, hopefully! Thank you very much!
– LuLeBe
Mar 22 at 18:30
3
Or to flip the description around: the light that gets through the aperture formed a 10 cm disk where it met the objective lens. When you increase the f-stop you start intercepting some of that light.
– dmckee
Mar 22 at 19:14
@dmckee Absolutely, great way of stating it from the iris's viewpoint! =)
– scottbb
Mar 22 at 19:30
So, this is why we almost always see f-numbers used instead of absolute sizes in centimeters! Because f-numbers don't change when zooming while sizes of entrance pupil do.
– Ruslan
Mar 22 at 22:15
@bogl Actually, the opposite is true. Almost all of the light passing through a telephoto lens is nearly perpendicular to the imaging plane, thus the front element needs to be as wide as the ep. With a WA lens the front element can be smaller than the ep, but this leads to darker edges of the frame. Wider angle lenses (particularly retrofocus designs) require a much larger front element than ep in order to allow the ep (or at least most of it) to be seen from the lens' full angle of view. Please see this answer for more.
– Michael C
Mar 23 at 8:31
add a comment |
Lens designers have a few tricks up their sleeves. As an example, zoom lenses change focal lengths but the aperture diameter does not physically change with the zoom. This is an oddity because as the focal length changes, so does image brightness. In fact, if the focal length is doubled, image brightness falls off 4X. Conversely, if the focal length halves, image brightness will increases 4X. How do you think the optician compensated and maintained the exposure? The front group of lens elements acts as a magnifier. In other words, the diameter of the iris as seen by the outside world appears expand and contract with the zoom when in fact it is fixed as to diameter. It is the apparent diameter of the iris and not the actual diameter that determines the light gathering power of the lens. Note: most inexpensive zooms give up the ghost as the user zooms towards max magnification. A more costly zoom will likely maintain a constant exposure throughout the zoom.
1
Right yes I know about constant aperture zoom lenses. I originally thought they'd have a larger aperture and just close it down when zoomed out. But that makes much more sense the way you explained it, thanks!
– LuLeBe
Mar 22 at 17:26
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Your observations of the lens leads you to both a correct, and incorrect, conclusion.
Correct: the aperture (i.e., mechanical iris) of the lens is substantially smaller than the 10 cm it supposedly should be. Only the front element is anywhere near 10 cm diameter. Where the iris mechanism is in the lens barrel, the diameter is substantially smaller than 10 cm.
Incorrect: the stated aperture size is not actually 10 cm in diameter. In reality, it is the the apparent size of the wide-open aperture (the iris), when viewed through the front of the lens, that is 10 cm in diameter.
For any lens, the aperture when viewed through the front of the lens is known as the entrance pupil. It is the entrance pupil that is 10 cm in diameter.
See also:
- Size of the entrance pupil vs size of the aperture
1
That made it so clear, even better than the first answer. I think I understood it now, hopefully! Thank you very much!
– LuLeBe
Mar 22 at 18:30
3
Or to flip the description around: the light that gets through the aperture formed a 10 cm disk where it met the objective lens. When you increase the f-stop you start intercepting some of that light.
– dmckee
Mar 22 at 19:14
@dmckee Absolutely, great way of stating it from the iris's viewpoint! =)
– scottbb
Mar 22 at 19:30
So, this is why we almost always see f-numbers used instead of absolute sizes in centimeters! Because f-numbers don't change when zooming while sizes of entrance pupil do.
– Ruslan
Mar 22 at 22:15
@bogl Actually, the opposite is true. Almost all of the light passing through a telephoto lens is nearly perpendicular to the imaging plane, thus the front element needs to be as wide as the ep. With a WA lens the front element can be smaller than the ep, but this leads to darker edges of the frame. Wider angle lenses (particularly retrofocus designs) require a much larger front element than ep in order to allow the ep (or at least most of it) to be seen from the lens' full angle of view. Please see this answer for more.
– Michael C
Mar 23 at 8:31
add a comment |
Your observations of the lens leads you to both a correct, and incorrect, conclusion.
Correct: the aperture (i.e., mechanical iris) of the lens is substantially smaller than the 10 cm it supposedly should be. Only the front element is anywhere near 10 cm diameter. Where the iris mechanism is in the lens barrel, the diameter is substantially smaller than 10 cm.
Incorrect: the stated aperture size is not actually 10 cm in diameter. In reality, it is the the apparent size of the wide-open aperture (the iris), when viewed through the front of the lens, that is 10 cm in diameter.
For any lens, the aperture when viewed through the front of the lens is known as the entrance pupil. It is the entrance pupil that is 10 cm in diameter.
See also:
- Size of the entrance pupil vs size of the aperture
1
That made it so clear, even better than the first answer. I think I understood it now, hopefully! Thank you very much!
– LuLeBe
Mar 22 at 18:30
3
Or to flip the description around: the light that gets through the aperture formed a 10 cm disk where it met the objective lens. When you increase the f-stop you start intercepting some of that light.
– dmckee
Mar 22 at 19:14
@dmckee Absolutely, great way of stating it from the iris's viewpoint! =)
– scottbb
Mar 22 at 19:30
So, this is why we almost always see f-numbers used instead of absolute sizes in centimeters! Because f-numbers don't change when zooming while sizes of entrance pupil do.
– Ruslan
Mar 22 at 22:15
@bogl Actually, the opposite is true. Almost all of the light passing through a telephoto lens is nearly perpendicular to the imaging plane, thus the front element needs to be as wide as the ep. With a WA lens the front element can be smaller than the ep, but this leads to darker edges of the frame. Wider angle lenses (particularly retrofocus designs) require a much larger front element than ep in order to allow the ep (or at least most of it) to be seen from the lens' full angle of view. Please see this answer for more.
– Michael C
Mar 23 at 8:31
add a comment |
Your observations of the lens leads you to both a correct, and incorrect, conclusion.
Correct: the aperture (i.e., mechanical iris) of the lens is substantially smaller than the 10 cm it supposedly should be. Only the front element is anywhere near 10 cm diameter. Where the iris mechanism is in the lens barrel, the diameter is substantially smaller than 10 cm.
Incorrect: the stated aperture size is not actually 10 cm in diameter. In reality, it is the the apparent size of the wide-open aperture (the iris), when viewed through the front of the lens, that is 10 cm in diameter.
For any lens, the aperture when viewed through the front of the lens is known as the entrance pupil. It is the entrance pupil that is 10 cm in diameter.
See also:
- Size of the entrance pupil vs size of the aperture
Your observations of the lens leads you to both a correct, and incorrect, conclusion.
Correct: the aperture (i.e., mechanical iris) of the lens is substantially smaller than the 10 cm it supposedly should be. Only the front element is anywhere near 10 cm diameter. Where the iris mechanism is in the lens barrel, the diameter is substantially smaller than 10 cm.
Incorrect: the stated aperture size is not actually 10 cm in diameter. In reality, it is the the apparent size of the wide-open aperture (the iris), when viewed through the front of the lens, that is 10 cm in diameter.
For any lens, the aperture when viewed through the front of the lens is known as the entrance pupil. It is the entrance pupil that is 10 cm in diameter.
See also:
- Size of the entrance pupil vs size of the aperture
edited Mar 22 at 18:32
answered Mar 22 at 18:28
scottbbscottbb
20.7k75895
20.7k75895
1
That made it so clear, even better than the first answer. I think I understood it now, hopefully! Thank you very much!
– LuLeBe
Mar 22 at 18:30
3
Or to flip the description around: the light that gets through the aperture formed a 10 cm disk where it met the objective lens. When you increase the f-stop you start intercepting some of that light.
– dmckee
Mar 22 at 19:14
@dmckee Absolutely, great way of stating it from the iris's viewpoint! =)
– scottbb
Mar 22 at 19:30
So, this is why we almost always see f-numbers used instead of absolute sizes in centimeters! Because f-numbers don't change when zooming while sizes of entrance pupil do.
– Ruslan
Mar 22 at 22:15
@bogl Actually, the opposite is true. Almost all of the light passing through a telephoto lens is nearly perpendicular to the imaging plane, thus the front element needs to be as wide as the ep. With a WA lens the front element can be smaller than the ep, but this leads to darker edges of the frame. Wider angle lenses (particularly retrofocus designs) require a much larger front element than ep in order to allow the ep (or at least most of it) to be seen from the lens' full angle of view. Please see this answer for more.
– Michael C
Mar 23 at 8:31
add a comment |
1
That made it so clear, even better than the first answer. I think I understood it now, hopefully! Thank you very much!
– LuLeBe
Mar 22 at 18:30
3
Or to flip the description around: the light that gets through the aperture formed a 10 cm disk where it met the objective lens. When you increase the f-stop you start intercepting some of that light.
– dmckee
Mar 22 at 19:14
@dmckee Absolutely, great way of stating it from the iris's viewpoint! =)
– scottbb
Mar 22 at 19:30
So, this is why we almost always see f-numbers used instead of absolute sizes in centimeters! Because f-numbers don't change when zooming while sizes of entrance pupil do.
– Ruslan
Mar 22 at 22:15
@bogl Actually, the opposite is true. Almost all of the light passing through a telephoto lens is nearly perpendicular to the imaging plane, thus the front element needs to be as wide as the ep. With a WA lens the front element can be smaller than the ep, but this leads to darker edges of the frame. Wider angle lenses (particularly retrofocus designs) require a much larger front element than ep in order to allow the ep (or at least most of it) to be seen from the lens' full angle of view. Please see this answer for more.
– Michael C
Mar 23 at 8:31
1
1
That made it so clear, even better than the first answer. I think I understood it now, hopefully! Thank you very much!
– LuLeBe
Mar 22 at 18:30
That made it so clear, even better than the first answer. I think I understood it now, hopefully! Thank you very much!
– LuLeBe
Mar 22 at 18:30
3
3
Or to flip the description around: the light that gets through the aperture formed a 10 cm disk where it met the objective lens. When you increase the f-stop you start intercepting some of that light.
– dmckee
Mar 22 at 19:14
Or to flip the description around: the light that gets through the aperture formed a 10 cm disk where it met the objective lens. When you increase the f-stop you start intercepting some of that light.
– dmckee
Mar 22 at 19:14
@dmckee Absolutely, great way of stating it from the iris's viewpoint! =)
– scottbb
Mar 22 at 19:30
@dmckee Absolutely, great way of stating it from the iris's viewpoint! =)
– scottbb
Mar 22 at 19:30
So, this is why we almost always see f-numbers used instead of absolute sizes in centimeters! Because f-numbers don't change when zooming while sizes of entrance pupil do.
– Ruslan
Mar 22 at 22:15
So, this is why we almost always see f-numbers used instead of absolute sizes in centimeters! Because f-numbers don't change when zooming while sizes of entrance pupil do.
– Ruslan
Mar 22 at 22:15
@bogl Actually, the opposite is true. Almost all of the light passing through a telephoto lens is nearly perpendicular to the imaging plane, thus the front element needs to be as wide as the ep. With a WA lens the front element can be smaller than the ep, but this leads to darker edges of the frame. Wider angle lenses (particularly retrofocus designs) require a much larger front element than ep in order to allow the ep (or at least most of it) to be seen from the lens' full angle of view. Please see this answer for more.
– Michael C
Mar 23 at 8:31
@bogl Actually, the opposite is true. Almost all of the light passing through a telephoto lens is nearly perpendicular to the imaging plane, thus the front element needs to be as wide as the ep. With a WA lens the front element can be smaller than the ep, but this leads to darker edges of the frame. Wider angle lenses (particularly retrofocus designs) require a much larger front element than ep in order to allow the ep (or at least most of it) to be seen from the lens' full angle of view. Please see this answer for more.
– Michael C
Mar 23 at 8:31
add a comment |
Lens designers have a few tricks up their sleeves. As an example, zoom lenses change focal lengths but the aperture diameter does not physically change with the zoom. This is an oddity because as the focal length changes, so does image brightness. In fact, if the focal length is doubled, image brightness falls off 4X. Conversely, if the focal length halves, image brightness will increases 4X. How do you think the optician compensated and maintained the exposure? The front group of lens elements acts as a magnifier. In other words, the diameter of the iris as seen by the outside world appears expand and contract with the zoom when in fact it is fixed as to diameter. It is the apparent diameter of the iris and not the actual diameter that determines the light gathering power of the lens. Note: most inexpensive zooms give up the ghost as the user zooms towards max magnification. A more costly zoom will likely maintain a constant exposure throughout the zoom.
1
Right yes I know about constant aperture zoom lenses. I originally thought they'd have a larger aperture and just close it down when zoomed out. But that makes much more sense the way you explained it, thanks!
– LuLeBe
Mar 22 at 17:26
add a comment |
Lens designers have a few tricks up their sleeves. As an example, zoom lenses change focal lengths but the aperture diameter does not physically change with the zoom. This is an oddity because as the focal length changes, so does image brightness. In fact, if the focal length is doubled, image brightness falls off 4X. Conversely, if the focal length halves, image brightness will increases 4X. How do you think the optician compensated and maintained the exposure? The front group of lens elements acts as a magnifier. In other words, the diameter of the iris as seen by the outside world appears expand and contract with the zoom when in fact it is fixed as to diameter. It is the apparent diameter of the iris and not the actual diameter that determines the light gathering power of the lens. Note: most inexpensive zooms give up the ghost as the user zooms towards max magnification. A more costly zoom will likely maintain a constant exposure throughout the zoom.
1
Right yes I know about constant aperture zoom lenses. I originally thought they'd have a larger aperture and just close it down when zoomed out. But that makes much more sense the way you explained it, thanks!
– LuLeBe
Mar 22 at 17:26
add a comment |
Lens designers have a few tricks up their sleeves. As an example, zoom lenses change focal lengths but the aperture diameter does not physically change with the zoom. This is an oddity because as the focal length changes, so does image brightness. In fact, if the focal length is doubled, image brightness falls off 4X. Conversely, if the focal length halves, image brightness will increases 4X. How do you think the optician compensated and maintained the exposure? The front group of lens elements acts as a magnifier. In other words, the diameter of the iris as seen by the outside world appears expand and contract with the zoom when in fact it is fixed as to diameter. It is the apparent diameter of the iris and not the actual diameter that determines the light gathering power of the lens. Note: most inexpensive zooms give up the ghost as the user zooms towards max magnification. A more costly zoom will likely maintain a constant exposure throughout the zoom.
Lens designers have a few tricks up their sleeves. As an example, zoom lenses change focal lengths but the aperture diameter does not physically change with the zoom. This is an oddity because as the focal length changes, so does image brightness. In fact, if the focal length is doubled, image brightness falls off 4X. Conversely, if the focal length halves, image brightness will increases 4X. How do you think the optician compensated and maintained the exposure? The front group of lens elements acts as a magnifier. In other words, the diameter of the iris as seen by the outside world appears expand and contract with the zoom when in fact it is fixed as to diameter. It is the apparent diameter of the iris and not the actual diameter that determines the light gathering power of the lens. Note: most inexpensive zooms give up the ghost as the user zooms towards max magnification. A more costly zoom will likely maintain a constant exposure throughout the zoom.
answered Mar 22 at 16:53
Alan MarcusAlan Marcus
25.9k23060
25.9k23060
1
Right yes I know about constant aperture zoom lenses. I originally thought they'd have a larger aperture and just close it down when zoomed out. But that makes much more sense the way you explained it, thanks!
– LuLeBe
Mar 22 at 17:26
add a comment |
1
Right yes I know about constant aperture zoom lenses. I originally thought they'd have a larger aperture and just close it down when zoomed out. But that makes much more sense the way you explained it, thanks!
– LuLeBe
Mar 22 at 17:26
1
1
Right yes I know about constant aperture zoom lenses. I originally thought they'd have a larger aperture and just close it down when zoomed out. But that makes much more sense the way you explained it, thanks!
– LuLeBe
Mar 22 at 17:26
Right yes I know about constant aperture zoom lenses. I originally thought they'd have a larger aperture and just close it down when zoomed out. But that makes much more sense the way you explained it, thanks!
– LuLeBe
Mar 22 at 17:26
add a comment |
1
Related: How do zoom lenses restrict their widest aperture at the telephoto end? and How wide does the front element of a lens has to be, given the focal length and the aperture? and How is the F stop number derived? and Why doesn't the picture become darker the more you zoom in? and Why do lenses have different diameters?
– Michael C
Mar 23 at 8:25
I'm not sure this is the same question as the dupe. Answers to that question — for that matter, the question itself — assume understanding of effective aperture, which is basically the answer here. That question is more of a follow up detail.
– mattdm
Mar 23 at 14:54