Is “et al. [1]” used as a singular or plural subject?
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ margin-bottom:0;
}
I've checked out a similar question, but to the best of my knowledge, it only tells me that "Name et al." is used as a singular subject since it refers to the authors, but what if the “et al..” part is followed by the citation of their article? I found the following sentence in a journal paper:
Gomes et al. [7] also outline a greedy method for finding feasible solutions...
So how should I use something like "et al. [1]" in the end? I'm really confused now.
grammar grammatical-number latin
asked Mar 26 at 2:51
MarkMark
407146
add a comment |
I've checked out a similar question, but to the best of my knowledge, it only tells me that "Name et al." is used as a singular subject since it refers to the authors, but what if the “et al..” part is followed by the citation of their article? I found the following sentence in a journal paper:
Gomes et al. [7] also outline a greedy method for finding feasible solutions...
So how should I use something like "et al. [1]" in the end? I'm really confused now.
grammar grammatical-number latin
asked Mar 26 at 2:51
MarkMark
407146
I think you misunderstood the answer to the question that you cite.
– Damila
Mar 26 at 4:48
add a comment |
I've checked out a similar question, but to the best of my knowledge, it only tells me that "Name et al." is used as a singular subject since it refers to the authors, but what if the “et al..” part is followed by the citation of their article? I found the following sentence in a journal paper:
Gomes et al. [7] also outline a greedy method for finding feasible solutions...
So how should I use something like "et al. [1]" in the end? I'm really confused now.
grammar grammatical-number latin
asked Mar 26 at 2:51
MarkMark
407146
I've checked out a similar question, but to the best of my knowledge, it only tells me that "Name et al." is used as a singular subject since it refers to the authors, but what if the “et al..” part is followed by the citation of their article? I found the following sentence in a journal paper:
Gomes et al. [7] also outline a greedy method for finding feasible solutions...
So how should I use something like "et al. [1]" in the end? I'm really confused now.
grammar grammatical-number latin
grammar grammatical-number latin
asked Mar 26 at 2:51
MarkMark
407146
asked Mar 26 at 2:51
MarkMark
407146
edited Mar 26 at 5:03
Mark
asked Mar 26 at 2:51
MarkMark
407146
asked Mar 26 at 2:51
MarkMark
407146
asked Mar 26 at 2:51
MarkMark
407146
407146
I think you misunderstood the answer to the question that you cite.
– Damila
Mar 26 at 4:48
add a comment |
I think you misunderstood the answer to the question that you cite.
– Damila
Mar 26 at 4:48
I think you misunderstood the answer to the question that you cite.
– Damila
Mar 26 at 4:48
I think you misunderstood the answer to the question that you cite.
– Damila
Mar 26 at 4:48
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
Et alii means "and others", so it would make sense to treat Gomes and others as plural. Note that et al. is not used for et alius ("and another"), since Gomes et alius is barely or not at all shorter than Gomes and Samuel: it is only used when there are three or more authors in total.
On the other hand, Gomes et al. can stand metonymically for the text by Gomes et al., which would be singular; so a case can be made for treating it as singular.
answered Mar 26 at 3:47
CerberusCerberus
54.3k2121208
So both singular and plural usages can be valid depending on context?
– Mark
Mar 26 at 5:06
1
@Mark Singular usage would be rare. It would be for the case where you have a plural subject being treated as a singular, like "Strunk and White says you shouldn't do that", where "Strunk and White" refers to the textbook by that pair of authors rather than to the authors themselves.
– tchrist♦
Mar 26 at 13:51
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "97"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f491352%2fis-et-al-1-used-as-a-singular-or-plural-subject%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Et alii means "and others", so it would make sense to treat Gomes and others as plural. Note that et al. is not used for et alius ("and another"), since Gomes et alius is barely or not at all shorter than Gomes and Samuel: it is only used when there are three or more authors in total.
On the other hand, Gomes et al. can stand metonymically for the text by Gomes et al., which would be singular; so a case can be made for treating it as singular.
answered Mar 26 at 3:47
CerberusCerberus
54.3k2121208
So both singular and plural usages can be valid depending on context?
– Mark
Mar 26 at 5:06
1
@Mark Singular usage would be rare. It would be for the case where you have a plural subject being treated as a singular, like "Strunk and White says you shouldn't do that", where "Strunk and White" refers to the textbook by that pair of authors rather than to the authors themselves.
– tchrist♦
Mar 26 at 13:51
add a comment |
Et alii means "and others", so it would make sense to treat Gomes and others as plural. Note that et al. is not used for et alius ("and another"), since Gomes et alius is barely or not at all shorter than Gomes and Samuel: it is only used when there are three or more authors in total.
On the other hand, Gomes et al. can stand metonymically for the text by Gomes et al., which would be singular; so a case can be made for treating it as singular.
answered Mar 26 at 3:47
CerberusCerberus
54.3k2121208
So both singular and plural usages can be valid depending on context?
– Mark
Mar 26 at 5:06
1
@Mark Singular usage would be rare. It would be for the case where you have a plural subject being treated as a singular, like "Strunk and White says you shouldn't do that", where "Strunk and White" refers to the textbook by that pair of authors rather than to the authors themselves.
– tchrist♦
Mar 26 at 13:51
add a comment |
Et alii means "and others", so it would make sense to treat Gomes and others as plural. Note that et al. is not used for et alius ("and another"), since Gomes et alius is barely or not at all shorter than Gomes and Samuel: it is only used when there are three or more authors in total.
On the other hand, Gomes et al. can stand metonymically for the text by Gomes et al., which would be singular; so a case can be made for treating it as singular.
answered Mar 26 at 3:47
CerberusCerberus
54.3k2121208
Et alii means "and others", so it would make sense to treat Gomes and others as plural. Note that et al. is not used for et alius ("and another"), since Gomes et alius is barely or not at all shorter than Gomes and Samuel: it is only used when there are three or more authors in total.
On the other hand, Gomes et al. can stand metonymically for the text by Gomes et al., which would be singular; so a case can be made for treating it as singular.
answered Mar 26 at 3:47
CerberusCerberus
54.3k2121208
answered Mar 26 at 3:47
CerberusCerberus
54.3k2121208
answered Mar 26 at 3:47
CerberusCerberus
54.3k2121208
answered Mar 26 at 3:47
CerberusCerberus
54.3k2121208
54.3k2121208
So both singular and plural usages can be valid depending on context?
– Mark
Mar 26 at 5:06
1
@Mark Singular usage would be rare. It would be for the case where you have a plural subject being treated as a singular, like "Strunk and White says you shouldn't do that", where "Strunk and White" refers to the textbook by that pair of authors rather than to the authors themselves.
– tchrist♦
Mar 26 at 13:51
add a comment |
So both singular and plural usages can be valid depending on context?
– Mark
Mar 26 at 5:06
1
@Mark Singular usage would be rare. It would be for the case where you have a plural subject being treated as a singular, like "Strunk and White says you shouldn't do that", where "Strunk and White" refers to the textbook by that pair of authors rather than to the authors themselves.
– tchrist♦
Mar 26 at 13:51
So both singular and plural usages can be valid depending on context?
– Mark
Mar 26 at 5:06
So both singular and plural usages can be valid depending on context?
– Mark
Mar 26 at 5:06
1
1
@Mark Singular usage would be rare. It would be for the case where you have a plural subject being treated as a singular, like "Strunk and White says you shouldn't do that", where "Strunk and White" refers to the textbook by that pair of authors rather than to the authors themselves.
– tchrist♦
Mar 26 at 13:51
@Mark Singular usage would be rare. It would be for the case where you have a plural subject being treated as a singular, like "Strunk and White says you shouldn't do that", where "Strunk and White" refers to the textbook by that pair of authors rather than to the authors themselves.
– tchrist♦
Mar 26 at 13:51
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language & Usage Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f491352%2fis-et-al-1-used-as-a-singular-or-plural-subject%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
I think you misunderstood the answer to the question that you cite.
– Damila
Mar 26 at 4:48