On model categories where every object is bifibrant












8












$begingroup$


Most model structures we use either have that every object is fibrant or that every object is cofibrant, and we have various general constructions that allow (under some assumption) to go from one situation to the other.



But there are very few examples of model categories where every object is both fibrant and cofibrant ("bifibrant").



The only example I know is when one starts with a strict 2-category with strict 2-limits and 2-colimits there are model structures on its underlying 1-category where every object is bifibrant and whose Dwyer-Kan localization is equivalent to the $2$-category itself (where one drop non-invertible 2-cells). So this typically applies to the canonical model category on Cat or on Groupoids. I'm not even sure it can be used to model things like the $2$-category of categories with finite limits.



I don't believe there are that many other examples. But I have never seen any obstruction for this. So:



Is there any example of a model category where every object is bifibrant whose localization is not a $2$-category?



Is every presentable $infty$-category represented by a model category where every object is bifibrant? If (as I expect) this is not the case, can we give an explicit 'obstruction' or an example to show it isn't the case?



Edit : The first question has been completely answered, but I havn't accepted answer so far because I'm still hoping to get an answer (positive or negative) to the second question.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Hi Simon. Just wanted to say, I haven't forgotten your email, and I do plan to reply. I've just been really busy. Sorry!
    $endgroup$
    – David White
    Mar 29 at 11:18










  • $begingroup$
    Trivial examples: any complete and cocomplete category with the isomorphisms as weak equivalences, and all morphisms are both fibrations and cofibrations.
    $endgroup$
    – Daniel Robert-Nicoud
    Mar 29 at 16:36










  • $begingroup$
    @DanielRobert-Nicoud : This one is a special case of the 2-categorical example.
    $endgroup$
    – Simon Henry
    Mar 29 at 17:15










  • $begingroup$
    I think your second question is much harder than your first one, so it might be better to ask them as separate questions.
    $endgroup$
    – Mike Shulman
    Mar 30 at 14:46
















8












$begingroup$


Most model structures we use either have that every object is fibrant or that every object is cofibrant, and we have various general constructions that allow (under some assumption) to go from one situation to the other.



But there are very few examples of model categories where every object is both fibrant and cofibrant ("bifibrant").



The only example I know is when one starts with a strict 2-category with strict 2-limits and 2-colimits there are model structures on its underlying 1-category where every object is bifibrant and whose Dwyer-Kan localization is equivalent to the $2$-category itself (where one drop non-invertible 2-cells). So this typically applies to the canonical model category on Cat or on Groupoids. I'm not even sure it can be used to model things like the $2$-category of categories with finite limits.



I don't believe there are that many other examples. But I have never seen any obstruction for this. So:



Is there any example of a model category where every object is bifibrant whose localization is not a $2$-category?



Is every presentable $infty$-category represented by a model category where every object is bifibrant? If (as I expect) this is not the case, can we give an explicit 'obstruction' or an example to show it isn't the case?



Edit : The first question has been completely answered, but I havn't accepted answer so far because I'm still hoping to get an answer (positive or negative) to the second question.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Hi Simon. Just wanted to say, I haven't forgotten your email, and I do plan to reply. I've just been really busy. Sorry!
    $endgroup$
    – David White
    Mar 29 at 11:18










  • $begingroup$
    Trivial examples: any complete and cocomplete category with the isomorphisms as weak equivalences, and all morphisms are both fibrations and cofibrations.
    $endgroup$
    – Daniel Robert-Nicoud
    Mar 29 at 16:36










  • $begingroup$
    @DanielRobert-Nicoud : This one is a special case of the 2-categorical example.
    $endgroup$
    – Simon Henry
    Mar 29 at 17:15










  • $begingroup$
    I think your second question is much harder than your first one, so it might be better to ask them as separate questions.
    $endgroup$
    – Mike Shulman
    Mar 30 at 14:46














8












8








8





$begingroup$


Most model structures we use either have that every object is fibrant or that every object is cofibrant, and we have various general constructions that allow (under some assumption) to go from one situation to the other.



But there are very few examples of model categories where every object is both fibrant and cofibrant ("bifibrant").



The only example I know is when one starts with a strict 2-category with strict 2-limits and 2-colimits there are model structures on its underlying 1-category where every object is bifibrant and whose Dwyer-Kan localization is equivalent to the $2$-category itself (where one drop non-invertible 2-cells). So this typically applies to the canonical model category on Cat or on Groupoids. I'm not even sure it can be used to model things like the $2$-category of categories with finite limits.



I don't believe there are that many other examples. But I have never seen any obstruction for this. So:



Is there any example of a model category where every object is bifibrant whose localization is not a $2$-category?



Is every presentable $infty$-category represented by a model category where every object is bifibrant? If (as I expect) this is not the case, can we give an explicit 'obstruction' or an example to show it isn't the case?



Edit : The first question has been completely answered, but I havn't accepted answer so far because I'm still hoping to get an answer (positive or negative) to the second question.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




Most model structures we use either have that every object is fibrant or that every object is cofibrant, and we have various general constructions that allow (under some assumption) to go from one situation to the other.



But there are very few examples of model categories where every object is both fibrant and cofibrant ("bifibrant").



The only example I know is when one starts with a strict 2-category with strict 2-limits and 2-colimits there are model structures on its underlying 1-category where every object is bifibrant and whose Dwyer-Kan localization is equivalent to the $2$-category itself (where one drop non-invertible 2-cells). So this typically applies to the canonical model category on Cat or on Groupoids. I'm not even sure it can be used to model things like the $2$-category of categories with finite limits.



I don't believe there are that many other examples. But I have never seen any obstruction for this. So:



Is there any example of a model category where every object is bifibrant whose localization is not a $2$-category?



Is every presentable $infty$-category represented by a model category where every object is bifibrant? If (as I expect) this is not the case, can we give an explicit 'obstruction' or an example to show it isn't the case?



Edit : The first question has been completely answered, but I havn't accepted answer so far because I'm still hoping to get an answer (positive or negative) to the second question.







at.algebraic-topology ct.category-theory homotopy-theory model-categories






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Mar 29 at 17:29







Simon Henry

















asked Mar 29 at 8:53









Simon HenrySimon Henry

15.6k14991




15.6k14991












  • $begingroup$
    Hi Simon. Just wanted to say, I haven't forgotten your email, and I do plan to reply. I've just been really busy. Sorry!
    $endgroup$
    – David White
    Mar 29 at 11:18










  • $begingroup$
    Trivial examples: any complete and cocomplete category with the isomorphisms as weak equivalences, and all morphisms are both fibrations and cofibrations.
    $endgroup$
    – Daniel Robert-Nicoud
    Mar 29 at 16:36










  • $begingroup$
    @DanielRobert-Nicoud : This one is a special case of the 2-categorical example.
    $endgroup$
    – Simon Henry
    Mar 29 at 17:15










  • $begingroup$
    I think your second question is much harder than your first one, so it might be better to ask them as separate questions.
    $endgroup$
    – Mike Shulman
    Mar 30 at 14:46


















  • $begingroup$
    Hi Simon. Just wanted to say, I haven't forgotten your email, and I do plan to reply. I've just been really busy. Sorry!
    $endgroup$
    – David White
    Mar 29 at 11:18










  • $begingroup$
    Trivial examples: any complete and cocomplete category with the isomorphisms as weak equivalences, and all morphisms are both fibrations and cofibrations.
    $endgroup$
    – Daniel Robert-Nicoud
    Mar 29 at 16:36










  • $begingroup$
    @DanielRobert-Nicoud : This one is a special case of the 2-categorical example.
    $endgroup$
    – Simon Henry
    Mar 29 at 17:15










  • $begingroup$
    I think your second question is much harder than your first one, so it might be better to ask them as separate questions.
    $endgroup$
    – Mike Shulman
    Mar 30 at 14:46
















$begingroup$
Hi Simon. Just wanted to say, I haven't forgotten your email, and I do plan to reply. I've just been really busy. Sorry!
$endgroup$
– David White
Mar 29 at 11:18




$begingroup$
Hi Simon. Just wanted to say, I haven't forgotten your email, and I do plan to reply. I've just been really busy. Sorry!
$endgroup$
– David White
Mar 29 at 11:18












$begingroup$
Trivial examples: any complete and cocomplete category with the isomorphisms as weak equivalences, and all morphisms are both fibrations and cofibrations.
$endgroup$
– Daniel Robert-Nicoud
Mar 29 at 16:36




$begingroup$
Trivial examples: any complete and cocomplete category with the isomorphisms as weak equivalences, and all morphisms are both fibrations and cofibrations.
$endgroup$
– Daniel Robert-Nicoud
Mar 29 at 16:36












$begingroup$
@DanielRobert-Nicoud : This one is a special case of the 2-categorical example.
$endgroup$
– Simon Henry
Mar 29 at 17:15




$begingroup$
@DanielRobert-Nicoud : This one is a special case of the 2-categorical example.
$endgroup$
– Simon Henry
Mar 29 at 17:15












$begingroup$
I think your second question is much harder than your first one, so it might be better to ask them as separate questions.
$endgroup$
– Mike Shulman
Mar 30 at 14:46




$begingroup$
I think your second question is much harder than your first one, so it might be better to ask them as separate questions.
$endgroup$
– Mike Shulman
Mar 30 at 14:46










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















11












$begingroup$

Another example is given by Strom's model structure on topological spaces where




  • Fibrations: Hurewicz fibrations,

  • Weak equivalences : (strong) homotopy equivalences.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$





















    10












    $begingroup$

    An example of a different sort is the model structure on $R$-mod, whose homotopy category is the stable module category. A great reference is Theorem 2.2.12 in Hovey's book Model Categories. In this reference, $R$ is taken to be quasi-Frobenius. This model structure is generalized to work for any ring in the thesis of Daniel Bravo, and a resulting paper of Bravo-Gillespie-Hovey. But, you lose the property about all objects being bifibrant.



    Another example is the projective (or injective) model structure on $Ch(R)$ where $R$ is a field, and where we take chain complexes to be bounded (e.g. always non-negative degree, or you could do cochain complexes in non-positive degree). A great reference is Quillen's Rational Homotopy Theory. See also Section 2.3 of Hovey's book, but this is for the situation of unbounded chain complexes. The point is that, for the projective model structure, the fibrations are surjections, and as Lemma 2.3.6 shows, bounded below complexes of projective modules are cofibrant, and if $R$ is a field (or semi-simple ring) then all modules are projective.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$





















      0












      $begingroup$

      Look at this paper for some examples: Strong cofibrations and fibrations in enriched categories by R. Schwänzl and R. M. Vogt.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$














        Your Answer





        StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
        return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
        StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
        StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
        });
        });
        }, "mathjax-editing");

        StackExchange.ready(function() {
        var channelOptions = {
        tags: "".split(" "),
        id: "504"
        };
        initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

        StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
        // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
        if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
        StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
        createEditor();
        });
        }
        else {
        createEditor();
        }
        });

        function createEditor() {
        StackExchange.prepareEditor({
        heartbeatType: 'answer',
        autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
        convertImagesToLinks: true,
        noModals: true,
        showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
        reputationToPostImages: 10,
        bindNavPrevention: true,
        postfix: "",
        imageUploader: {
        brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
        contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
        allowUrls: true
        },
        noCode: true, onDemand: true,
        discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
        ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
        });


        }
        });














        draft saved

        draft discarded


















        StackExchange.ready(
        function () {
        StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathoverflow.net%2fquestions%2f326647%2fon-model-categories-where-every-object-is-bifibrant%23new-answer', 'question_page');
        }
        );

        Post as a guest















        Required, but never shown

























        3 Answers
        3






        active

        oldest

        votes








        3 Answers
        3






        active

        oldest

        votes









        active

        oldest

        votes






        active

        oldest

        votes









        11












        $begingroup$

        Another example is given by Strom's model structure on topological spaces where




        • Fibrations: Hurewicz fibrations,

        • Weak equivalences : (strong) homotopy equivalences.






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$


















          11












          $begingroup$

          Another example is given by Strom's model structure on topological spaces where




          • Fibrations: Hurewicz fibrations,

          • Weak equivalences : (strong) homotopy equivalences.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$
















            11












            11








            11





            $begingroup$

            Another example is given by Strom's model structure on topological spaces where




            • Fibrations: Hurewicz fibrations,

            • Weak equivalences : (strong) homotopy equivalences.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$



            Another example is given by Strom's model structure on topological spaces where




            • Fibrations: Hurewicz fibrations,

            • Weak equivalences : (strong) homotopy equivalences.







            share|cite|improve this answer












            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer










            answered Mar 29 at 11:42









            David CDavid C

            7,42022141




            7,42022141























                10












                $begingroup$

                An example of a different sort is the model structure on $R$-mod, whose homotopy category is the stable module category. A great reference is Theorem 2.2.12 in Hovey's book Model Categories. In this reference, $R$ is taken to be quasi-Frobenius. This model structure is generalized to work for any ring in the thesis of Daniel Bravo, and a resulting paper of Bravo-Gillespie-Hovey. But, you lose the property about all objects being bifibrant.



                Another example is the projective (or injective) model structure on $Ch(R)$ where $R$ is a field, and where we take chain complexes to be bounded (e.g. always non-negative degree, or you could do cochain complexes in non-positive degree). A great reference is Quillen's Rational Homotopy Theory. See also Section 2.3 of Hovey's book, but this is for the situation of unbounded chain complexes. The point is that, for the projective model structure, the fibrations are surjections, and as Lemma 2.3.6 shows, bounded below complexes of projective modules are cofibrant, and if $R$ is a field (or semi-simple ring) then all modules are projective.






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$


















                  10












                  $begingroup$

                  An example of a different sort is the model structure on $R$-mod, whose homotopy category is the stable module category. A great reference is Theorem 2.2.12 in Hovey's book Model Categories. In this reference, $R$ is taken to be quasi-Frobenius. This model structure is generalized to work for any ring in the thesis of Daniel Bravo, and a resulting paper of Bravo-Gillespie-Hovey. But, you lose the property about all objects being bifibrant.



                  Another example is the projective (or injective) model structure on $Ch(R)$ where $R$ is a field, and where we take chain complexes to be bounded (e.g. always non-negative degree, or you could do cochain complexes in non-positive degree). A great reference is Quillen's Rational Homotopy Theory. See also Section 2.3 of Hovey's book, but this is for the situation of unbounded chain complexes. The point is that, for the projective model structure, the fibrations are surjections, and as Lemma 2.3.6 shows, bounded below complexes of projective modules are cofibrant, and if $R$ is a field (or semi-simple ring) then all modules are projective.






                  share|cite|improve this answer









                  $endgroup$
















                    10












                    10








                    10





                    $begingroup$

                    An example of a different sort is the model structure on $R$-mod, whose homotopy category is the stable module category. A great reference is Theorem 2.2.12 in Hovey's book Model Categories. In this reference, $R$ is taken to be quasi-Frobenius. This model structure is generalized to work for any ring in the thesis of Daniel Bravo, and a resulting paper of Bravo-Gillespie-Hovey. But, you lose the property about all objects being bifibrant.



                    Another example is the projective (or injective) model structure on $Ch(R)$ where $R$ is a field, and where we take chain complexes to be bounded (e.g. always non-negative degree, or you could do cochain complexes in non-positive degree). A great reference is Quillen's Rational Homotopy Theory. See also Section 2.3 of Hovey's book, but this is for the situation of unbounded chain complexes. The point is that, for the projective model structure, the fibrations are surjections, and as Lemma 2.3.6 shows, bounded below complexes of projective modules are cofibrant, and if $R$ is a field (or semi-simple ring) then all modules are projective.






                    share|cite|improve this answer









                    $endgroup$



                    An example of a different sort is the model structure on $R$-mod, whose homotopy category is the stable module category. A great reference is Theorem 2.2.12 in Hovey's book Model Categories. In this reference, $R$ is taken to be quasi-Frobenius. This model structure is generalized to work for any ring in the thesis of Daniel Bravo, and a resulting paper of Bravo-Gillespie-Hovey. But, you lose the property about all objects being bifibrant.



                    Another example is the projective (or injective) model structure on $Ch(R)$ where $R$ is a field, and where we take chain complexes to be bounded (e.g. always non-negative degree, or you could do cochain complexes in non-positive degree). A great reference is Quillen's Rational Homotopy Theory. See also Section 2.3 of Hovey's book, but this is for the situation of unbounded chain complexes. The point is that, for the projective model structure, the fibrations are surjections, and as Lemma 2.3.6 shows, bounded below complexes of projective modules are cofibrant, and if $R$ is a field (or semi-simple ring) then all modules are projective.







                    share|cite|improve this answer












                    share|cite|improve this answer



                    share|cite|improve this answer










                    answered Mar 29 at 11:18









                    David WhiteDavid White

                    13.1k462105




                    13.1k462105























                        0












                        $begingroup$

                        Look at this paper for some examples: Strong cofibrations and fibrations in enriched categories by R. Schwänzl and R. M. Vogt.






                        share|cite|improve this answer









                        $endgroup$


















                          0












                          $begingroup$

                          Look at this paper for some examples: Strong cofibrations and fibrations in enriched categories by R. Schwänzl and R. M. Vogt.






                          share|cite|improve this answer









                          $endgroup$
















                            0












                            0








                            0





                            $begingroup$

                            Look at this paper for some examples: Strong cofibrations and fibrations in enriched categories by R. Schwänzl and R. M. Vogt.






                            share|cite|improve this answer









                            $endgroup$



                            Look at this paper for some examples: Strong cofibrations and fibrations in enriched categories by R. Schwänzl and R. M. Vogt.







                            share|cite|improve this answer












                            share|cite|improve this answer



                            share|cite|improve this answer










                            answered Apr 2 at 8:52









                            Philippe GaucherPhilippe Gaucher

                            1,7191020




                            1,7191020






























                                draft saved

                                draft discarded




















































                                Thanks for contributing an answer to MathOverflow!


                                • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                                But avoid



                                • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                                • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                                Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                                To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                                draft saved


                                draft discarded














                                StackExchange.ready(
                                function () {
                                StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathoverflow.net%2fquestions%2f326647%2fon-model-categories-where-every-object-is-bifibrant%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                                }
                                );

                                Post as a guest















                                Required, but never shown





















































                                Required, but never shown














                                Required, but never shown












                                Required, but never shown







                                Required, but never shown

































                                Required, but never shown














                                Required, but never shown












                                Required, but never shown







                                Required, but never shown







                                Popular posts from this blog

                                If I really need a card on my start hand, how many mulligans make sense? [duplicate]

                                Alcedinidae

                                Can an atomic nucleus contain both particles and antiparticles? [duplicate]