term/phrase for words that are traditionally two words, but it has become grammatically acceptable to join...
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ margin-bottom:0;
}
Is there at term/phrase for words that are traditionally two words, but it has become grammatically acceptable to join them? .e.g. firehose
So, not a portmanteau or compound word or blend word, not a creation of a new word. Just a change in what we, societally, consider grammatically correct in writing.
grammar
add a comment |
Is there at term/phrase for words that are traditionally two words, but it has become grammatically acceptable to join them? .e.g. firehose
So, not a portmanteau or compound word or blend word, not a creation of a new word. Just a change in what we, societally, consider grammatically correct in writing.
grammar
2
Actually, we do call them compound words. For example, "school teacher" became "school-teacher" and then just "schoolteacher", both compounds. Similarly "head master" became "head-master" and then "headmaster", again both compounds.
– BillJ
Mar 29 at 15:51
Off line → off-line → offline.
– Jason Bassford
Mar 29 at 16:27
And online (we used to go on-line). Words evolve (as shown in comments above).
– KannE
Mar 30 at 1:57
add a comment |
Is there at term/phrase for words that are traditionally two words, but it has become grammatically acceptable to join them? .e.g. firehose
So, not a portmanteau or compound word or blend word, not a creation of a new word. Just a change in what we, societally, consider grammatically correct in writing.
grammar
Is there at term/phrase for words that are traditionally two words, but it has become grammatically acceptable to join them? .e.g. firehose
So, not a portmanteau or compound word or blend word, not a creation of a new word. Just a change in what we, societally, consider grammatically correct in writing.
grammar
grammar
asked Mar 29 at 15:45
KatyKaty
112
112
2
Actually, we do call them compound words. For example, "school teacher" became "school-teacher" and then just "schoolteacher", both compounds. Similarly "head master" became "head-master" and then "headmaster", again both compounds.
– BillJ
Mar 29 at 15:51
Off line → off-line → offline.
– Jason Bassford
Mar 29 at 16:27
And online (we used to go on-line). Words evolve (as shown in comments above).
– KannE
Mar 30 at 1:57
add a comment |
2
Actually, we do call them compound words. For example, "school teacher" became "school-teacher" and then just "schoolteacher", both compounds. Similarly "head master" became "head-master" and then "headmaster", again both compounds.
– BillJ
Mar 29 at 15:51
Off line → off-line → offline.
– Jason Bassford
Mar 29 at 16:27
And online (we used to go on-line). Words evolve (as shown in comments above).
– KannE
Mar 30 at 1:57
2
2
Actually, we do call them compound words. For example, "school teacher" became "school-teacher" and then just "schoolteacher", both compounds. Similarly "head master" became "head-master" and then "headmaster", again both compounds.
– BillJ
Mar 29 at 15:51
Actually, we do call them compound words. For example, "school teacher" became "school-teacher" and then just "schoolteacher", both compounds. Similarly "head master" became "head-master" and then "headmaster", again both compounds.
– BillJ
Mar 29 at 15:51
Off line → off-line → offline.
– Jason Bassford
Mar 29 at 16:27
Off line → off-line → offline.
– Jason Bassford
Mar 29 at 16:27
And online (we used to go on-line). Words evolve (as shown in comments above).
– KannE
Mar 30 at 1:57
And online (we used to go on-line). Words evolve (as shown in comments above).
– KannE
Mar 30 at 1:57
add a comment |
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "97"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f491863%2fterm-phrase-for-words-that-are-traditionally-two-words-but-it-has-become-gramma%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language & Usage Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f491863%2fterm-phrase-for-words-that-are-traditionally-two-words-but-it-has-become-gramma%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
2
Actually, we do call them compound words. For example, "school teacher" became "school-teacher" and then just "schoolteacher", both compounds. Similarly "head master" became "head-master" and then "headmaster", again both compounds.
– BillJ
Mar 29 at 15:51
Off line → off-line → offline.
– Jason Bassford
Mar 29 at 16:27
And online (we used to go on-line). Words evolve (as shown in comments above).
– KannE
Mar 30 at 1:57