Is this a faulty parrallelism or is there an expression like this?
A gardener can't just wish for a beautiful garden and one suddenly appears.
I happened to see this sentence on an article about the importance of making an effort, and i can see that the sentence means you can't get something only by wishing for it.
Is this sentence grammatically wrong? Or it's just a common expression ? Help!
grammar
New contributor
Jiniat is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
A gardener can't just wish for a beautiful garden and one suddenly appears.
I happened to see this sentence on an article about the importance of making an effort, and i can see that the sentence means you can't get something only by wishing for it.
Is this sentence grammatically wrong? Or it's just a common expression ? Help!
grammar
New contributor
Jiniat is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
1
Not every written text requires parallelism. Whether they do or don't depends on many factors.
– Lambie
8 hours ago
The sentence is poorly written, but I'm ok with "A gardener can't just wish for a beautiful garden.and - poof!/voilà!/behold!/Tada!- one ... appears. The extra beat prevents the mind from trying to connect "and" with the second part of a compound verb. (The absence of a comma exacerbates this problem, but inserting a comma alone doesn't save the sentence from sounding awkward.) To my ear, the urgency of the interjections ousts the mental template the audience would otherwise deploy on seeing "and" without a comma. Good style is often just a matter of invoking and filling such templates.
– remarkl
7 hours ago
add a comment |
A gardener can't just wish for a beautiful garden and one suddenly appears.
I happened to see this sentence on an article about the importance of making an effort, and i can see that the sentence means you can't get something only by wishing for it.
Is this sentence grammatically wrong? Or it's just a common expression ? Help!
grammar
New contributor
Jiniat is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
A gardener can't just wish for a beautiful garden and one suddenly appears.
I happened to see this sentence on an article about the importance of making an effort, and i can see that the sentence means you can't get something only by wishing for it.
Is this sentence grammatically wrong? Or it's just a common expression ? Help!
grammar
grammar
New contributor
Jiniat is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
Jiniat is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
edited 7 hours ago
Glorfindel
8,185103741
8,185103741
New contributor
Jiniat is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked 8 hours ago
JiniatJiniat
41
41
New contributor
Jiniat is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
Jiniat is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
Jiniat is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
1
Not every written text requires parallelism. Whether they do or don't depends on many factors.
– Lambie
8 hours ago
The sentence is poorly written, but I'm ok with "A gardener can't just wish for a beautiful garden.and - poof!/voilà!/behold!/Tada!- one ... appears. The extra beat prevents the mind from trying to connect "and" with the second part of a compound verb. (The absence of a comma exacerbates this problem, but inserting a comma alone doesn't save the sentence from sounding awkward.) To my ear, the urgency of the interjections ousts the mental template the audience would otherwise deploy on seeing "and" without a comma. Good style is often just a matter of invoking and filling such templates.
– remarkl
7 hours ago
add a comment |
1
Not every written text requires parallelism. Whether they do or don't depends on many factors.
– Lambie
8 hours ago
The sentence is poorly written, but I'm ok with "A gardener can't just wish for a beautiful garden.and - poof!/voilà!/behold!/Tada!- one ... appears. The extra beat prevents the mind from trying to connect "and" with the second part of a compound verb. (The absence of a comma exacerbates this problem, but inserting a comma alone doesn't save the sentence from sounding awkward.) To my ear, the urgency of the interjections ousts the mental template the audience would otherwise deploy on seeing "and" without a comma. Good style is often just a matter of invoking and filling such templates.
– remarkl
7 hours ago
1
1
Not every written text requires parallelism. Whether they do or don't depends on many factors.
– Lambie
8 hours ago
Not every written text requires parallelism. Whether they do or don't depends on many factors.
– Lambie
8 hours ago
The sentence is poorly written, but I'm ok with "A gardener can't just wish for a beautiful garden.and - poof!/voilà!/behold!/Tada!- one ... appears. The extra beat prevents the mind from trying to connect "and" with the second part of a compound verb. (The absence of a comma exacerbates this problem, but inserting a comma alone doesn't save the sentence from sounding awkward.) To my ear, the urgency of the interjections ousts the mental template the audience would otherwise deploy on seeing "and" without a comma. Good style is often just a matter of invoking and filling such templates.
– remarkl
7 hours ago
The sentence is poorly written, but I'm ok with "A gardener can't just wish for a beautiful garden.and - poof!/voilà!/behold!/Tada!- one ... appears. The extra beat prevents the mind from trying to connect "and" with the second part of a compound verb. (The absence of a comma exacerbates this problem, but inserting a comma alone doesn't save the sentence from sounding awkward.) To my ear, the urgency of the interjections ousts the mental template the audience would otherwise deploy on seeing "and" without a comma. Good style is often just a matter of invoking and filling such templates.
– remarkl
7 hours ago
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
This is a very interesting example of the flexibility of language, most notably of the English language.
'A gardener can't just wish for a beautiful garden and ...
What is expected is that we shall get a second verb dependent on can’t, such as
... expect one suddenly to appear.
Instead, all that gets stripped out and out of no-grammatical-where comes
... one suddenly appears.
So form follows meaning. And we all understand. The grammar is stretched but does not actually break.
Nice observation, but what is you answer to the question?
– Davo
7 hours ago
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "97"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Jiniat is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f488695%2fis-this-a-faulty-parrallelism-or-is-there-an-expression-like-this%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
This is a very interesting example of the flexibility of language, most notably of the English language.
'A gardener can't just wish for a beautiful garden and ...
What is expected is that we shall get a second verb dependent on can’t, such as
... expect one suddenly to appear.
Instead, all that gets stripped out and out of no-grammatical-where comes
... one suddenly appears.
So form follows meaning. And we all understand. The grammar is stretched but does not actually break.
Nice observation, but what is you answer to the question?
– Davo
7 hours ago
add a comment |
This is a very interesting example of the flexibility of language, most notably of the English language.
'A gardener can't just wish for a beautiful garden and ...
What is expected is that we shall get a second verb dependent on can’t, such as
... expect one suddenly to appear.
Instead, all that gets stripped out and out of no-grammatical-where comes
... one suddenly appears.
So form follows meaning. And we all understand. The grammar is stretched but does not actually break.
Nice observation, but what is you answer to the question?
– Davo
7 hours ago
add a comment |
This is a very interesting example of the flexibility of language, most notably of the English language.
'A gardener can't just wish for a beautiful garden and ...
What is expected is that we shall get a second verb dependent on can’t, such as
... expect one suddenly to appear.
Instead, all that gets stripped out and out of no-grammatical-where comes
... one suddenly appears.
So form follows meaning. And we all understand. The grammar is stretched but does not actually break.
This is a very interesting example of the flexibility of language, most notably of the English language.
'A gardener can't just wish for a beautiful garden and ...
What is expected is that we shall get a second verb dependent on can’t, such as
... expect one suddenly to appear.
Instead, all that gets stripped out and out of no-grammatical-where comes
... one suddenly appears.
So form follows meaning. And we all understand. The grammar is stretched but does not actually break.
edited 7 hours ago
answered 7 hours ago
TuffyTuffy
3,9361620
3,9361620
Nice observation, but what is you answer to the question?
– Davo
7 hours ago
add a comment |
Nice observation, but what is you answer to the question?
– Davo
7 hours ago
Nice observation, but what is you answer to the question?
– Davo
7 hours ago
Nice observation, but what is you answer to the question?
– Davo
7 hours ago
add a comment |
Jiniat is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Jiniat is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Jiniat is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Jiniat is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language & Usage Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f488695%2fis-this-a-faulty-parrallelism-or-is-there-an-expression-like-this%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
Not every written text requires parallelism. Whether they do or don't depends on many factors.
– Lambie
8 hours ago
The sentence is poorly written, but I'm ok with "A gardener can't just wish for a beautiful garden.and - poof!/voilà!/behold!/Tada!- one ... appears. The extra beat prevents the mind from trying to connect "and" with the second part of a compound verb. (The absence of a comma exacerbates this problem, but inserting a comma alone doesn't save the sentence from sounding awkward.) To my ear, the urgency of the interjections ousts the mental template the audience would otherwise deploy on seeing "and" without a comma. Good style is often just a matter of invoking and filling such templates.
– remarkl
7 hours ago